FJ A330-200 damaged at NAN
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FJ A330-200 damaged at NAN
Travel Alerts - Fiji Airways Official Site
earlier this week one of the 3 FJ 330's was damaged, which messed up their schedule.
Presume anyone flying from OZ or NZL to LAX could have easily been put on a nonstop service to LAX, but the question is, why don't they seem to have a contingency in place for such situations ?
It's seems they are trying to run a 3 aircraft long haul schedule now with 2 long haul aircraft (apparently some of the NAN/OZ services have been downgraded to 737's, so maybe VA & JQ are carrying some of FJ pax.
Surely with QF owning something like 46% of FJ & NZ owning something like 3%, they could find a suitable replacement aircraft from QF or NZ ?
Although with all QF's 763's now gone, no help.
(AFAIK NZ used to fly A 763 nan/lax/nan 10 years ago)
Read somewhere that FJ have or are looking at getting another 330 later this year, this time a 330-300 . Bet they wish they had it now.
earlier this week one of the 3 FJ 330's was damaged, which messed up their schedule.
Presume anyone flying from OZ or NZL to LAX could have easily been put on a nonstop service to LAX, but the question is, why don't they seem to have a contingency in place for such situations ?
It's seems they are trying to run a 3 aircraft long haul schedule now with 2 long haul aircraft (apparently some of the NAN/OZ services have been downgraded to 737's, so maybe VA & JQ are carrying some of FJ pax.
Surely with QF owning something like 46% of FJ & NZ owning something like 3%, they could find a suitable replacement aircraft from QF or NZ ?
Although with all QF's 763's now gone, no help.
(AFAIK NZ used to fly A 763 nan/lax/nan 10 years ago)
Read somewhere that FJ have or are looking at getting another 330 later this year, this time a 330-300 . Bet they wish they had it now.
The 330 was damaged in LA on the ground.
Even with QF ownership QF wouldn't give them an aeroplane to replace the damaged one, they would need to hire it at exorbitant rates.
The FJ crews may or may not be able to operate the VH tailed aeroplane, depends on the licensing issues as well as what their regulator would require with regards differences GE vs RR etc, don't even know if they could operate it EDTO if it was a dry lease.
If QF crewed it it would be even more expensive and I would venture prohibitively so.
So the long and short of it is that Fiji would be forced to make do with the equipment they have in the short term and if the repair takes longer than expected figure it out from there.
Either way it will be costing someone a bucket load of money and insurance won't cover a fair chunk of it
Even with QF ownership QF wouldn't give them an aeroplane to replace the damaged one, they would need to hire it at exorbitant rates.
The FJ crews may or may not be able to operate the VH tailed aeroplane, depends on the licensing issues as well as what their regulator would require with regards differences GE vs RR etc, don't even know if they could operate it EDTO if it was a dry lease.
If QF crewed it it would be even more expensive and I would venture prohibitively so.
So the long and short of it is that Fiji would be forced to make do with the equipment they have in the short term and if the repair takes longer than expected figure it out from there.
Either way it will be costing someone a bucket load of money and insurance won't cover a fair chunk of it
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no it was damaged at NAN. Flight was due to go NAN/LAX.
Fiji Airways A330 plane damaged | FijiMala
FJ could charter in anyone(it's Fiji traffic rights you're talking about)
It would make sense for QF to do it if they have the aircraft available.
RATES ?
When you won 1/2 of the airline, charging high rates, means charging yourself.
It doesn't sound like a 3 day fix.
Imagine there would be plenty of 767's sitting around in USA eg. who's owners would be glad to get some work for it for a week or 2.
Airlines chartering from other airlines don't pay silly adhoc rates.
Fiji Airways A330 plane damaged | FijiMala
FJ could charter in anyone(it's Fiji traffic rights you're talking about)
It would make sense for QF to do it if they have the aircraft available.
RATES ?
When you won 1/2 of the airline, charging high rates, means charging yourself.
It doesn't sound like a 3 day fix.
Imagine there would be plenty of 767's sitting around in USA eg. who's owners would be glad to get some work for it for a week or 2.
Airlines chartering from other airlines don't pay silly adhoc rates.
Airlines short leasing off other airlines do pay silly ad-hoc rates! Longer term leases are still expensive but are negotiable.
Most american B767/A330 operators do not have 180 EDTO approvals, they can get away for the majority of their operations at 120 EDTO to get to Europe.
EDTO is quite conservative and tied to tail specific airframes, airline operations procedures and crew training so it is not easy to move a tail into an operation quickly.
The main issue would be to find a tail that has similar weight specification to be able to operate the sector. The Air NZ B767-300 has a much higher TOW than the QF B767-300 which can be a huge limitation on available range. While I am not familiar with the A330 I am sure that the TOW would be the same differences between tails/fleets. No point paying for a TOW weight you don't need.
Another issue could be catering set up, if your operation uses non-standard equipment set up or the leased aircraft is non standard then up then you also have to arrange lease of special catering gear.
Most american B767/A330 operators do not have 180 EDTO approvals, they can get away for the majority of their operations at 120 EDTO to get to Europe.
EDTO is quite conservative and tied to tail specific airframes, airline operations procedures and crew training so it is not easy to move a tail into an operation quickly.
The main issue would be to find a tail that has similar weight specification to be able to operate the sector. The Air NZ B767-300 has a much higher TOW than the QF B767-300 which can be a huge limitation on available range. While I am not familiar with the A330 I am sure that the TOW would be the same differences between tails/fleets. No point paying for a TOW weight you don't need.
Another issue could be catering set up, if your operation uses non-standard equipment set up or the leased aircraft is non standard then up then you also have to arrange lease of special catering gear.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what about LAX/HNL/NAN then ?
What we were really getting at is, you'd think they have contingency plans when an aircraft goes U/S somewhere.
+ just remembered FJ 737's did used to fly NAN/HNL/YVR, so they could fly NAN/HNL/LAX.
What we were really getting at is, you'd think they have contingency plans when an aircraft goes U/S somewhere.
+ just remembered FJ 737's did used to fly NAN/HNL/YVR, so they could fly NAN/HNL/LAX.
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main issue would be to find a tail that has similar weight specification to be able to operate the sector. The Air NZ B767-300 has a much higher TOW than the QF B767-300 which can be a huge limitation on available range. While I am not familiar with the A330 I am sure that the TOW would be the same differences between tails/fleets. No point paying for a TOW weight you don't need.
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
"Contingency plans"...
You're kidding aren't you?
In the past maybe but have a look at the Top brass there and why they have been rolling over so many management positions
It's a very hard sector to find replacement airframes for, as eluded to above.
Seat purchases on competitors flights on a similar route are really the only get out of jail card otherwise. Is that what they have done now BNEA320?
QF aren't active board members and have tried to be kicked off.
Fierce jingoism rules there now while they tolerate expats who fill the shortfall for now.
Profits? Yeh sure.
Contingency? Our new planes won't break down/ go u/s...
You're kidding aren't you?
In the past maybe but have a look at the Top brass there and why they have been rolling over so many management positions
It's a very hard sector to find replacement airframes for, as eluded to above.
Seat purchases on competitors flights on a similar route are really the only get out of jail card otherwise. Is that what they have done now BNEA320?
QF aren't active board members and have tried to be kicked off.
Fierce jingoism rules there now while they tolerate expats who fill the shortfall for now.
Profits? Yeh sure.
Contingency? Our new planes won't break down/ go u/s...
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all airlines that we know have contingency plans in case of aircraft going U/S.
Eg. An airlines used to work for had contracts at right prices, in place in case of such thing happening.
eg.
1) contact airline A
2) contact airline B
etc.
For example, Nauru Airlines have an old NZ 733, sitting at BNE most/all of week.
So FJ could move one or more of their 738's or 737-700 onto NAN/SYD/NAN instead of A330-200 & they could bring in Nauru Airlines 733 to replace 738 or 737-700.
What would you rather, be delayed a lot of hours or be put on an older aircraft ?
Eg. An airlines used to work for had contracts at right prices, in place in case of such thing happening.
eg.
1) contact airline A
2) contact airline B
etc.
For example, Nauru Airlines have an old NZ 733, sitting at BNE most/all of week.
So FJ could move one or more of their 738's or 737-700 onto NAN/SYD/NAN instead of A330-200 & they could bring in Nauru Airlines 733 to replace 738 or 737-700.
What would you rather, be delayed a lot of hours or be put on an older aircraft ?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FJ do NAN/HNL/NAN nonstop in both directions once a week. They go via CXI & APW for other 2 services a week now. Not a big deal.
What would you rather do ?
Be delayed 10 hours or more or fly on a 738 instead ? Most people would say the latter.
What would you rather do ?
Be delayed 10 hours or more or fly on a 738 instead ? Most people would say the latter.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FJ still showing delays over over 5 hours on NAN/AKL/NAN today + a charter flight NAN/AKL/NAN.
Maybe they've found a aircraft for one rotation ?
NF, PX, ???
Maybe an F100 of PX ?
Maybe they've found a aircraft for one rotation ?
NF, PX, ???
Maybe an F100 of PX ?
