Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

www.kiwiregionalairlines.co.nz

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

www.kiwiregionalairlines.co.nz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2016, 00:22
  #101 (permalink)  
Water Wings
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Freedom Air totally illegal but NZ got away with it.
And yet they were never deemed to have breached the Commerce Act.

Protecting market share versus predatory pricing......hell of a grey area and there's a reason case law is so limited on it. What limited case law does exist, the Privy Council were quite clear that an established player is within their rights to compete aggressively against new entrants to a market - even selling below cost is not necessarily viewed as being illegal.
 
Old 19th Jun 2016, 00:35
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
repeating yourself is not elaborating bnea320.

sounds to me like you've been saying it to yourself for long enough now you cant see any other way.

anyway, sorry kra has run out of cash. atleast they're making the changes in good time, and great news most everyone is keeping their job.
waren9 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2016, 07:27
  #103 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you cannot use your market power to run others out of business. Catch 22, is the others need to take the legal action 1st in most juristictions & lawyers cost money, big money in most cases. They always want to milk a case for as long as they can, so unless "others" have deep pockets, very hard to take on an "elephant" who also has govt support. Dodgy as hell.
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2016, 09:44
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so, you disagree with the privy council?
waren9 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2016, 13:07
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 37
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Freedom Air totally illegal
And also totally unrelated to the current failed business. "At least he had a go" doesn't mean much when everyone could see it was doomed to begin with. DN-QN as a flagship route with one non-RNP aircraft was a pretty big warning sign.


Edit: With that said, agree very much with waren9 that it's really good that it wasn't sudden, and that there's some options for continued work. So good on whoever managed to avoid a disaster.

Last edited by Aerozepplin; 19th Jun 2016 at 13:20.
Aerozepplin is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.