Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas back to SFO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2015, 03:02
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
CT: Yes. He is after the next sugar hit to increase his bonus or he leaps madly from one idea to the next in the HOPE (as you said) one works. He has been running around like a headless chook when the airline needs an AIRLINE CEO. And as we all know there is no one with any experience in airlines running the place. I think initially they wanted to spin off vast chunks for huge personal gain but that failed, so now they are progressing down any little blind alley that takes their fancy. Which is exactly what any company doesn't want. I hope our product isn't swamped by AA's, but if I was AA I would be all over the little Irish nurk's latest thought bubble. And I would be laughing about it all the way to my next board room meeting and beyond. Qantas won't be able to survive many more of Elaine's triumphantly negotiated deals.
V-Jet is online now  
Old 11th Jun 2015, 23:17
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just read that with new & revived QF/AA services OZ/USA there will be a 9% increase in capacity from 20DEC, but that there will be no decrease in fares.


So how are they going to sell an extra 9% without dropping fares, even a little ?


Get more yanks to fly here ? More ff seats ?
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2015, 23:18
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas back to SFO

Just a thought...A redeployment of the JQ 788's to QF could free up some 744's for the Pacific
correcting is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2015, 01:59
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeh AC seem to be on the money doing BNE/YVR nonstop with 787. Would only have to be twice a week to start with.
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2015, 07:27
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney
Age: 70
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CT

The "Home Run" in his mind is Jetstar Japan, alleging the current stake is worth double what QF have tipped in

This is how the "home run" looks on the scoreboard:

Started flying on 3 July 2012.

FY ended June 2013: Revenue Y12.8bn Operating Income -Y8.8bn
FY ended June 2014: Revenue Y29.1bn Operating Income -Y11.1bn
FY ending June 2015: Revenue ESt Y 32-33bn Operating Income Est -Y8-9bn

Initial capitalisation Y12bn
Ist recap Nov 2013 Y 11bn
2nd recap Nov 2014 Y11bn

Current Cash Situation approx Y5bn

Business has transitioned from startup and now running at a stable but negative earnings rate of approx 25% of revenue based on a 20XA320 fleet.

There will be a requirement for an additional capital injection before Xmas but JAL is disinclined to participate.

QF is locked into a 33.3% voting shareholding even though it's economic shareholding is now 47.1%.

Elaine claims the stake is worth twice what they have injected = A$ 300m

Now that is interesting math.
Meet the Fokker is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2015, 22:41
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, Fokker, no, your calculator isn't faulty. However, someone familiar with the situation suggests there have been informal offers of around $2 billion for the enterprise, hence, exactly as you say, the QF stake would be valued at $600+. That is the logic behind the valuation.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2015, 00:25
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Any chance you could introduce me to them? I've got an opera house and harbour bridge I'd like to sell!!!'
dragon man is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2015, 01:15
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take the 2 billion for Jetstar Japan, buy us some new aircraft and everyone is happy!
Tankengine is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2015, 07:45
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
33.3% is all Qantas can own under Japanese legislation. If they put another $50 million they will never see it again! A business that is stable but has negative earnings is heading for bankruptcy! Jetstar Asia lost $33 million, what an amazing business!
busdriver007 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2015, 06:56
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney
Age: 70
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curtains

Excuse me if I was not clear enough. QF Group has poured in a total of Yen 15bn to date. This equates to about AUD160m.

Net cash is approx Yen 5 billion with a cash burn rate of Yen 0.7 billion per month. Thus, the Mexican stand-off will reach a climax later this year.

11 of the a/c are owned by Mitsubishi Corporation (5) and Century Tokyo Leasing (6). They each have a 16.7% shareholding (voting) but a diluted economic interest given the two recaps undertaken to date. Neither of these two shareholders wishes to inject additional capital into the business. Likewise Japan Airlines.

The only way the model in Japan can be made to look like it is working is to take the a/c leasing costs and bury them somewhere else in the group via some opaque financial engineering that will be yet another prickly porcupine for QF shareholders to endure.

Not sure why Elaine is dog-whistling a figure of $2 bn but must assume he or "someone who is familiar" means the total Jetstar group. Let's see how that figure is arrived at...

QF ASK's + JQ ASK's = TTL ASK's

(JQ ASK's/TTL ASK's)XQF Market Cap = $2bn

Well the above calculation is as plausible as any other explanation the Coward St abacus clackers might come up with.

As they say, if it walks like a duck...
Meet the Fokker is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2015, 07:25
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fokker, wasn't having a go at you, I simply couldn't resist the obvious gag! I wish there was an auto /Sarc tag.

In all seriousness, the $2 billion valuation has nothing to do with your valid metrics, rather, its what someone else is willing to pay for the entire enterprise. The claimed "fly away" price is in the vicinity of $2 billion. We are talking different things, you are talking logic, reason & accounting valuation. Those familiar with the situation are talking about the valuation of entire entity as a trading asset, not conventional business metrics. We are comparing Fuji's with Cherries.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2015, 07:53
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney
Age: 70
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curtains

No problem. Never thought you were having a go.

Guessing the $2bn would be the only thing to fly away. Definitely some roos loose in the top paddock.

As a sidebar, no Oz mainland cherries allowed in to Japan due to some infestation issue. Prophetic perhaps.

Cheers
Meet the Fokker is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2015, 08:41
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Probably best not to comment when you are not in possession of factual information. You look very, very silly.

Cant seem to delete this. It was meant to be a response to the delightful FlyboatNorth on another thread. Sorry if anyone read this the way it was written rather than the way I intended it.

Last edited by V-Jet; 15th Jun 2015 at 10:36.
V-Jet is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2015, 11:37
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney
Age: 70
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V

ECAMS issue.
You press edit then it gives you a delete prompt.
If all else fails ...reboot.
Helps to have Bus time.

Always enjoy your posts.

Speaking of "what's it doing now?"..more factual information available soon from the Land of the Fuji apple.
Meet the Fokker is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.