Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Air Niugini's subsidiary - LINK PNG

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air Niugini's subsidiary - LINK PNG

Old 28th Jul 2019, 22:12
  #1441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QLD
Posts: 587
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
E195e2 needs 2km of runway.
Last time I was in PNG there wasn’t to many that long..

Back to Q400s
geeup is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2019, 07:53
  #1442 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,464
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Any truth in the rumour that Q400s are being reconsidered again?
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2019, 00:02
  #1443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aus
Posts: 764
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Duck Pilot
Any truth in the rumour that Q400s are being reconsidered again?
Rumour confirmed Duck.

Excerpt from a recent FSO:

SUBJECT: Dash8-300/-Q400Positions

Applications are invited for Captain and First Officer Dash 8-300 / -Q400 common crew positions.

The Link PNG Board has recently approved the acquisition of two Dash 8-Q400 aircraft. These aircraft will be operated by Link PNG on scheduled and charter services.


olderairhead is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2019, 09:39
  #1444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Applications are invited for Captain and First Officer Dash 8-300 / -Q400 common crew positions."

Isn't it a bit outdated to think that the -300 and -400 aircraft can be operated as a common fleet with common crew positions??

PX didn't when they operated the -400 last time (separate fleet even?)...and QF haven't, despite many continual years of operating the -400 alongside the "classic" versions.
Square Bear is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2019, 00:01
  #1445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QLD
Posts: 587
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Mitsubishi have presented a proposal for the Fokker replacement I’m told.

Must be Airbus turn now.
geeup is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2019, 01:07
  #1446 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In a lot of different Hotels
Posts: 70
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by geeup
Mitsubishi have presented a proposal for the Fokker replacement I’m told.

Must be Airbus turn now.


Fokker doesn’t need replacing, just spend the money on the Engineering Dept so they can be maintained properly and the Fokker will give PNG another 15 years.
To many years of corrupt heads of departments, new planes Won’t fix it, PX will just have broken arse new planes in 5 years!
splat72 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2019, 04:29
  #1447 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Port Moresby - The beer is cold at the Aviat and Car Clubs
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Airbus A220-300 demo today ?

Air Baltic A220-300 in POM today

Demo for Air Niugini? Like the Embraer 195, I think in same league . Can't beat the Fokker airframe.
Mumbai Merlin is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 04:16
  #1448 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aus
Posts: 764
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Here's a great opportunity:

IAC Global have teamed up with LinkPNG to offer DHC-8-Q402 Line Training Captain positions in Papua New Guinea.

LinkPNG, a subsidiary of Air Niugini, offer excellent terms and conditions on a 3-month contract with the possibility to extend.

For more information, please respond to this email as soon as possible with your CV, or call us at IAC Global
olderairhead is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 05:54
  #1449 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,464
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
3 month contract, that sounds very attractive...................
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 06:52
  #1450 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,534
Received 48 Likes on 30 Posts
Link to the job https://www.iacglobal.com/jobs/dhc-8...ining-captains

No maximum age is listed so it might suit someone who's retired and wants a bit of pocket money. Commuting contract from Cairns with excellent (subjective) terms and conditions but $$$ not stated.
krismiler is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 09:18
  #1451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,464
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Allow another 6 months to get through all the immigration aspects and the CASA PNG licencing and approval processes.

Thought PX would already have a couple of ex Q400 check and trainers within their existing pilot group.

How many airframes are they looking at?
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 01:24
  #1452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aus
Posts: 764
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Am I missing something?

Latest FSO

SUBJECT: Carriage of Life Raft POM-HIR-POM sectors

In accordance with rule part 91.525 (c.) Carriage of life raft(s) is not required


91.525 Flights over water to more than 200 nm

(a) An aircraft that is operated on a flight over water must be equipped with one life jacket or equivalent floatation device for each person on board and stowed in a position easily accessible from the seat or berth of the person for whose use it is provided if-

(1) the aircraft is a single-engine aircraft, and the flight distance to shore is more than gliding distance for the aircraft; or

(2) the aircraft is a multi-engine aircraft that is unable to maintain a height of at least 1000 feet AMSL with one engine inoperative, and the flight distance to shore is more than gliding distance for the aircraft; or

(3) the aircraft is a multi-engine aircraft that is capable of maintaining a height of at least 1000 feet AMSL with one engine inoperative and the flight distance to shore is more than 50 nm.

(b) A single engine aircraft, or multi-engine aircraft that is unable to maintain a height of at least 1000 feet AMSL with one engine inoperative, that is operated on a flight over water that extends to more than 100 nm from shore must be equipped with-

(1) enough life-rafts with buoyancy and rated capacity to accommodate all the occupants of the aircraft;and

(2) a survival locater light on each life-raft; and

(3) a survival kit, appropriately equipped for the route to be flown, attached to each required life-raft; and

(4) at least one pyrotechnic signalling device on each life-raft; and

(5) one ELT(S) or one EPIRB.

(c) A multi-engine aircraft that is capable of continuing flight with one or more engines inoperative, that is operated on a flight over water that extends to more than 200 nm from shore must be equipped with the equipment specified in paragraph (b).

olderairhead is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 02:22
  #1453 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The 245 bulkhead
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just this bit......

121.361 Flights over-water

A holder of an air operator certificate must ensure that each of the certificate holder’s aeroplanes configured for more than 30 passenger seats and operated over-water on flights where life rafts are required by rule 91.525 to be carried, is equipped with sufficient life rafts with buoyancy and overload capacity to accommodate every occupant of the aeroplane in the event of a loss of one raft of the largest rated capacity.
LPS500 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 09:24
  #1454 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,464
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Part 91 requirements are also required as they are the foundation flight operations rules, unless Part 121 has a cutout specifically referring to the Part 91 reg. Only other way around it is for the operator to have a CASA PNG approval to operate outside the requirements of the regulations - exemption.

Trust me as I once wrote this stuff after I left PX🤡🤡🤡
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 09:43
  #1455 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting.
Needs clarification but I was under the impression no life rafts on Dash 8-400 between Cairns - Port Moresby - Cairns?
I'll admit I am way out of my depth but I was under the impression a certain operator does not carry life rafts between SYD and Lord Howe Island and possibly BNE to Norfolk in a Dash 8 ?
Office Update is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 10:27
  #1456 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,464
Received 55 Likes on 38 Posts
Read the regs, and read them again and again and again and again and more. Very hard to digest exactly what the requirements are. All written by lawyers, not pilots....
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2019, 21:04
  #1457 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Office Update
Interesting.
Needs clarification but I was under the impression no life rafts on Dash 8-400 between Cairns - Port Moresby - Cairns?
I'll admit I am way out of my depth but I was under the impression a certain operator does not carry life rafts between SYD and Lord Howe Island and possibly BNE to Norfolk in a Dash 8 ?
Correct. No life rafts on QLink Dash 8's.
Going Nowhere is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2019, 04:12
  #1458 (permalink)  
NCD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seth Afrika
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GURNEY (AYGN) to HENDERSON (AGGH) is 580 nm, GURNEY to BUKA (AYBK) is 390 nm, and HENDERSON to BUKA is 400nm. Would have thought that if tracking DCT GURNEY HENDERSON on route B598 that the closest point to an airfield (BUKA - for the Fokker at least) would be at the halfway point, and then it would still be outside of 200 nm, - about 250 nm or so. Old guy, think we both missing something here.

POM to CNS no issue, quite a few airports between.

RE no life rafts on the QLink Dash 8 flight to Lord Howe, this link will take you to a pretty good Ben Sandilands 2011 Crickey.com article. https://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetal...in-a-ditching/
NCD is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2019, 05:50
  #1459 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
NCD,
I think at the time the Dash8-400 came under Dickie Smith affordable safety/statistics ramblings
A concession was granted ?? on the basis that the Dash was capable of flying BNE to Norfolk, missed approach followed by engine failure and depress and then carry on to the approved alternate aerodrome
Airframe was a proven quantity, engine ticked all the boxes so to speak
Regardless of the comfort factor of flight crew, the bean counters love it when more paying pax sit on bums!
Office Update is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2019, 06:17
  #1460 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Aus
Posts: 764
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NCD
Old guy, think we both missing something here.
No, don't think so.
Methinks lawyers would have fun with this if there was a ditching.

Also hearing of a new rostering policy of office duty instead of being on reserve. Clever... ....... Not.


olderairhead is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.