Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Cebu Pacific to have massive impact on Tasman

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Cebu Pacific to have massive impact on Tasman

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jun 2014, 00:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cebu Pacific to have massive impact on Tasman

if they indeed do an Emirates & extend their flights into Australia to New Zealand as rumoured.


Unlike EK, they are very low cost & with 436 seats on their A333's, their cost per seat will be very low.


Good for New Zealand tourism, but maybe bad for NZ, VA etc.


Fares to ZQN have got very expensive this year. Unfortunately an A333 can't get into ZQN.
jet1st is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 10:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,551
Received 51 Likes on 19 Posts
Do they have 5th freedom rights on the Tasman? Unlikely.
chimbu warrior is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 10:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: nz
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fresh air talks in Wellington between the Philippines and New Zealand on March 6 have paved the way for expanding traffic rights and increasing the number of seats between the two countries.

According to Carmelo Arcilla, Executive Director of the Civil Aeronautics Board, the two countries agreed to increase traffic rights for each country from the current 3 flights per week up to 21 flights each per week.

The new agreement also includes fifth freedom rights, which is permission to fly passengers to a third country from the country in which the air agreement exists. Now airlines from New Zealand may fly to the Philippines, pick up passengers and continue on to China. And for the first time Philippine carriers can land in New Zealand, pick up passengers and carry them on to Australia.
cnsnz is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 11:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
WHAT???

Isn't there already enough pressure on Qantas?

Maybe CX could start flying across as well, that would certainly keep those Kiwi commuters happy...
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 11:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Short final 05
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cebu Pacific to have massive impact on Tasman

436 in an A330-300?
Do you have to pay for the shoe-horn that wedges you into your seat?
TwoFiftyBelowTen is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 12:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mmmmmmm, better widen the runways and taxyways as well as they have a habit of leaving the hard surface....
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 12:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: some dive
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Probably as slick as this one!
ratpoison is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 12:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Ratpoison, that is a complete and utter furphy. I'm surprised you fell for it.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 22:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WA
Age: 71
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see there is a boomgate in the background, must be standard procedure to close the road during ops. Meaning they are possibly very constrained for rwy length on that field, could actually be very good flying into a difficult strip. Do ATR 72's have the same short field capabilities, of , say, a Dash 8-200? Not that any of this bears any relevance to trans-Tasman ops, of course.
ranmar850 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2014, 23:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
think u can get 440Y in a 333. wonder what happened to extra 4 seats ?

if they are $2 cheaper people Will fly them. with so many seats they could give away 100 per flight and still make money
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 00:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Normally around 50' over the threshold if you are legally landing on a destination Airport.......that's not even 15' and he's no where near the threshold yet!!

Cowboy, one day he will misjudge and drag all the fence along the runway with him!! Serve him right too.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 02:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You would have to pay me to travel with that seating density. 180 in an A320 for a couple of hours is just about doable, pay extra for an exit or front row seat and three or four hours is tolerable.

Eight hours of being crammed in like sardines would be a nightmare for an average sized Aussie, never mind some of the XXXL shirt buyers. That seating configuration is meant for Philippine workers traveling to and from the Middle East who weigh 60kgs, are very price sensitive and don't mind being packed in.

I'm sure the backpackers won't mind if it's cheap but unless they offer some form of premium class I doubt there'd be many repeat customers.
Metro man is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 03:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plenty will do it for 3 hours to nz + kiwis r tighter than australians
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 04:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how many filipino migrant workers live in nz?
waren9 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 04:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't Cebu Pacific been banned in the EU?

BNE320
From what I understand Jetstar have been struggling in NZ because kiwis have been willing to part with more cash for the better service they receive on Air NZ
kev2002 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 04:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no everyone wants cheap which is why qf in so.much trouble
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 11:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: some dive
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geeez Bloggs, you go and spoil all my fun. I bet you were always the naughty little boy that pulled down the pants of someone blowing out the candles on the birthday cake!
ratpoison is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 12:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 145
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Kev2002 spot on,

BNE A320, pop over to AKL some time, pass through security on a monday morning, and spend 15 minutes observing were all the suits go!!
95% up the stairs to Air New Zealand!!
Most of the suits wont touch the Jetstar product, and they WILL pay more to fly Air New Zealand!!
Boe787 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 19:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
according to google the eu ban was lifted in april
waren9 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 22:17
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WA
Age: 71
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normally around 50' over the threshold if you are legally landing on a destination Airport.......that's not even 15' and he's no where near the threshold yet!!

Cowboy, one day he will misjudge and drag all the fence along the runway with him!! Serve him right too
.

You are correct, of course, but I'm wondering if that photo doesn't show the whole story, as eye-catching as it is. And yes, doesn't that fence look rather freshly painted
ranmar850 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.