Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

300 Qantas pilots to get the chop ???

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

300 Qantas pilots to get the chop ???

Old 21st Jun 2014, 05:33
  #821 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,623
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
AIPA is in my opinion in deep poo. When approx. 60 % ( a guess) of Qantas long haul members are likely to lose 30% of their take home pay due to the RIN then IMO one of the first places that they will tighten their belts is with AIPA membership.
dragon man is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 05:48
  #822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Exiled in the Ukraine
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On another forum you will see some distinct cracks forming in the QF pilot solidarity front.

Looks like AIPA might be spending more and more time holding their own line together. Just what the Company wants!
We have to be careful not to take our eye off the ball with individual grievances, I know the current situation is a bitter pill to swallow and there is going to be a lot of us disadvantaged through this RIN process, some definitely more than others, but we have to stay united and support AIPA, they are our elected representative members and although individually we might not agree with them on certain perspectives and interpretations now is not the time to become fragmented, we must stay united.

The company are painting us in a corner with vague interpretations and misleading information (think Q14 Q&A RIN, it's purely a loaded and antagonistic Q&A to get a response) to force us to run off to FWA and do their dirty work for them (the company don't want to be seen as the ones to lodge the grievance to FWA, they want to be seen as the victim). The more individual grievances presented on a fractured front to FWA will just highlight the companies position that the current WD is unworkable and how costly this RIN process will be. Ultimately FWA will consider the viability and the financial strain placed upon the employer so there will be more chance that the pendulum will swing well and truly to the companies favour and then we can kiss goodbye any opportunity to negotiate from our current base (present WD) for efficiencies for offsets in the future.
Don't forget the company already have a blueprint of an award that they would like us to adopt, and the front cover is coloured Orange and Silver, we have been seeing it coming for a while but I think it's now at our door.

Lets not jump the gun and remove our elected representatives from the table, lets not rush off to FWA, let's stay in the game.

Don't play into the companies hands.

Last edited by Stalins ugly Brother; 21st Jun 2014 at 10:02.
Stalins ugly Brother is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 08:10
  #823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CS
expressions of interest closed this arvo at 5pm. latest I heard was in the low twenties
Angryrat
Thanks CS. Was hoping for more like 30-40. Looks like 15 years will get me a back seat
Good news, Angryrat. As of last Monday the count was definitely 30. It is entirely probable that by 1700 Friday the count would be 40+.

I'm surprised that some office wallah wasn't detailed to broadcast the final numbers at 1701 Friday by one of the many available channels. While it matters not at all to those taking the VR, the headcount sure matters to those worrying about their longhaul future, such as yourself. Another unnecessary weekend of worry. Just because some nine to fiver thinks that Monday morning is a continuation of Friday afternoon. Unacceptable in today's 24/7 world.
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 08:17
  #824 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne,Vic. Australia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At the AIPA meeting in Melbourne the number talked about was no more than 30 with an expectation that some may withdraw before 5pm. Or not.
Cunning_Stunt is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 08:39
  #825 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My info is from a closer source than AIPA and I'm satisfied it was correct at that time. I know of one withdrawal during the week. I also know of more than one addition.
The point is - why are we all still guessing and why were approximate 'yet to be finally confirmed' numbers not released Friday? Not names and not final dates, which still need some fine tuning next week.
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 09:53
  #826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
To the protagonists who are in raptures with the thought of AIPA's possible demise.....you haven't worked it out yet have you.
If and possibly when and or AIPA is defeated to the levels you want, QF IR will reload the gun and take on the next in the queue. There is no end game.

So to the AFAP members, JPC members, members of the essendon footy club, members of the royal family, members of whatever organisation you think or want to have represent you....please consider!
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 09:57
  #827 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Queensland
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....................
pa28capt is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 11:02
  #828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The bush
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Tuner 2, you say,
If the AFAP is so great then why was VIPA formed and and why did it take hundreds and hundreds of VA members? If AIPA is so anti Jetstar pilots why does it still have hundreds of JQ members? Yeah, so the AFAP advertises the MBF as a big reason to join, we don't hear so much about the amazing industrial results like losing legal challenges to destroy MOU agreements made well before self-interested pilots even joined JQ, do we?

One would have thought that as AFAP is representing JETSTAR PILOTS then there is no other interest than self interest in Jetstar. They cannot save the world from climate change nor is it their brief to wipe your backside
The Banjo is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 11:14
  #829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Banjo, yes, indeed, I couldn't agree more. My post was really a response to those saying "there already is one pilot union in Australia - the AFAP" - yet the AFAP with reference to JQ really just set out to 'tear up' (or at least, seriously water-down) an MOU signed by themselves back in 2004. Thus my point was that perhaps there really isn't "one pilot union for all" so long as we have the supposed 'original and one union for all' acting that way.
Tuner 2 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 11:16
  #830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A house
Posts: 645
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
They love sticking their nose in where it isnt wanted too. How are the AFAP meant to represent VARA and VAA, particularly if it came to integration (and conflicting interests) down the track. VARA have a perfectly good Association structure as it is.

Complete thread drift I know. I can say though that as long as there are multiple Union structures across the Qantas Group then self interest will always win out. Managements wet dream.
Chadzat is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 12:19
  #831 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a pipe in the upstairs water closet
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Surely with the industry completely FD in this country at present, perhaps each union could lay down arms and find a common good to fight for? I'm sure the members of each want that, perhaps it's the upper echelon of each union that have self serving interests...

Just sayin...

Fuel-Off
Fuel-Off is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 12:24
  #832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a great idea, fuel off...

It would require some pretty massive leadership from a few people...as well some serious compromises on a couple of issues. Possible? Yes. Likely? Probably not. Hope I'm proved wrong by someone.
Tuner 2 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 12:51
  #833 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
The point is - why are we all still guessing and why were approximate 'yet to be finally confirmed' numbers not released Friday? Not names and not final dates, which still need some fine tuning next week.
Don't expect it next week either. The wallah I spoke of refused to even give an indication of how many captains had put in an EOI. Apparently knowing that info (or not knowing) should have no affect on your decision making process. An assertion to which I expressed both my disbelief and disagreement.
Keg is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 13:35
  #834 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hicks House
Age: 77
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would everyone just settle down.

Having read some qrewroom posts of late, especially some complaining anout their loss of displacement rights etc.. People need to chill out.

All this "Reduction In Numbers " exercise is: Alan's creative way to go to fair work and say.. We as a company are losing millions. As a result of Qf practices, this is the RIN process, and this is the 100 million dollar pricetag.

Fair Work will say; "We'll, that is insane! How do you think you should let pilots go..

How that is done, is everyones guess.

As for QF pilots being made CR and moving to JQ on QF pay and conditions : You will find JQ's doors will be closed the same week you are made CR.
Wedcue is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 21:16
  #835 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair Work will say; "We'll, that is insane! How do you think you should let pilots go.
Feelin' lucky, Al?
Fair Work are much more likely to say 'this process was part of your log of claims, remember? The one that smacked down on to our doormat that we had to arbitrate. Get your own house in order. Suck it up'.

Don't expect it next week either. The wallah I spoke of refused to even give an indication of how many captains had put in an EOI.
You're probably right about that expectation Keg. I was puzzled that at least two of our hard working Fleet Captains have updated their blogs over the weekend [thanks RM and GS] without mentioning the critical number. But now I've figured out that the VR/RIN/CR process is being driven by Other People, and their consultants, who perhaps do not have their focus in quite the same place as Flt Ops. I'm sure that Flt Ops would very much like to get that info out there, but are being constrained by Other People.

Last edited by Captain Gidday; 21st Jun 2014 at 23:10.
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2014, 22:08
  #836 (permalink)  
bdcer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey gone fishin,

Can you please expand on your comment about JQ pilots leaving? How many have gone & over what time frame?

Cheers
 
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 01:18
  #837 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
9 FOs just resigned to go to the desert.

Not floodgates, but movement is always good regardless.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 02:06
  #838 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

I agree with Captain Gidday. FWA handed down this WD less than 2 years ago. I can't see them likely to trash their own handiwork so quickly.
Keg is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 02:29
  #839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Budapest
Posts: 77
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

I wouldn't be to quick to assume they won't throw out the baby with the bath water....with reference the WD....Remember the outcome of the Jetconnect inquiry!!!
cynphil is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2014, 03:04
  #840 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Inside their OODA loop
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by keg
I agree with Captain Gidday. FWA handed down this WD less than 2 years ago. I can't see them likely to trash their own handiwork so quickly.
That's why it is called extortion. Extraordinary outcomes require extraordinary circumstances, extraordinary circumstances require extraordinary engineering.

"Never let a [self generated] crisis go to waste"! Expect the "we would follow the rules, but it will bankrupt us" argument to be the sole "extraordinary circumstances".
Entirely engineered to fail, which leads to cynphil:
Originally Posted by cynphil
I wouldn't be to quick to assume they won't throw out the baby with the bath water....with reference the WD....Remember the outcome of the Jetconnect inquiry!!!
Yep, they are jammed up in the corner, all of their own making. They didn't quite realize how Mr Paul Daff's frank & truthfull admissions could be used to open up a whole Senate inquiry to further probe the financial workings of "The Group". However, this plan was put in place a long time ago & couldn't be undone. This will be causing lots sleepless nights.

The trick will be to create a very time sensitive imperative in an attempt to rush the inquiry through with unseamly haste. Slowing the process & concentrating on how we got here is the best strategy for pilots affected. This is not a lay down Misère for Alan.
FYSTI is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.