Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

300 Qantas pilots to get the chop ???

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

300 Qantas pilots to get the chop ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jul 2014, 09:27
  #901 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
A380 boss says on his blog that there is no plan for a second round of RINs. Surpluses will be managed by min divisors and assignment of leave.
The question is begged... Why?? Why keep a surplus? There is no cost benefit if the surplus is to remain, so why do it? In a couple of years we will be going down this path again when the final 744 goes.

I do not understand this under the current paradigm. Is there a chance that some 787-9s may still come and hence Flight ops are hedging their bets until that possibility is known?

If so good. If not...
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 10:08
  #902 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Particularly enjoyed the self-serving, self-congratulatory blog by the HOFO. What a FANTASTIC job the base and fleet captains have done EDUCATING us, the poor uneducated, unwashed pilot body. Thank goodness we have such a selfless group of people looking after our interests.

Where would we be without them.

(Any of them affected by the RIN?)
Full Flapper is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 11:34
  #903 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Flapper, the flight ops staff that are managing the process are not the same people who are making the policies driving the airline into the ground. To give credit where it is due, there has been a great deal of consultation between AIPA and flight ops. This, and the amount and quality of the information and advice coming from flight ops and AIPA has made the management of this ****ty situation much better than it could have been with a confrontational approach.

Last edited by theheadmaster; 15th Jul 2014 at 12:39.
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 11:46
  #904 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
The question is begged... Why?? Why keep a surplus? There is no cost benefit if the surplus is to remain, so why do it? In a couple of years we will be going down this path again when the final 744 goes.
I expect the word to Flt Ops from the top would have been - "for this year, you have to reduce your effective headcount by X and reduce your budget by Y". Simple as that, and that's exactly what they have done. Remaining surplus or no surplus is irrelevant, they met the target.

Next year expect the same - headcount by X, budget by Y, nothing more, nothing less.

No point in exceeding the target, it would just make it harder the next year.

Management 101 - the Qantas way!
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 12:51
  #905 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

I do not understand this under the current paradigm. Is there a chance that some 787-9s may still come and hence Flight ops are hedging their bets until that possibility is known?
I've always maintained that there is a narrative at play here. Watch for the miraculous turn around of QF in 6 months time.

A few execs (well higher than FLT OPS) are on record as saying that QF can't afford to NOT take on the 787-9. They just needed an excuse to whittle away the engineering system (achieved that by reducing 744 irframes beyond what is economically viable to maintain in house and dispose of all 767s even if we do end up short of capacity because the orange cancer can make up difference even if our pax hate it and avoid it where possible), and keep the pressure on to achieve better (for them)T&Cs on the long haul fleets. They'll achieve that before mid next year and THAT is when the 787s will be announced.

They'll be geniuses. Bonuses all round.
Keg is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 13:32
  #906 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
I am with you Keg, except I can feel in my waters that change is coming for them sooner than later. Change that maybe we can believe in for a change.

I am by nature a cynical pessimist, able to find twenty dark linings in every ten silver clouds, but now I am getting the sense that the grand plan is about to be abandoned by a new cadre of managers over the next year or so.

An informant reported approaching a solitary Joyce who was eating a sandwich in the QCC lobby last week, unattended and unshielded. That his electron cloud of sycophants was elsewhere cheers me, and is in keeping with the vibe coming from two friends in senior corporate roles with our two best customers. That by itself is a slim body of evidence upon which to build an expectation set, but we are also hearing of a board spill coming soon to a campus near you.

The unhappy accident of Clifford and Joyce appears to have passed its use-by-date, and like last year's Limburger is too foul to salvage. Along with it the soon to be discredited policies, fantasies and ideologies of the current crop of idiotti.

I hope that your rank slip is short lived but rewarding. And I hope that the 787 orders are actioned soon and well. I won't be around to see them, but I am looking forward to hearing tales of my compadres in the midst of a training surge to finally right old wrongs.

(Mindful of the adage that there is no fool like an old fool, goodnight)
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 13:41
  #907 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
I also wanted to comment on the observation that we cannot afford to not take up the 787 orders: that is true on two levels. We allegedly have a trigger price that is so low that we would make money through arbitrage in even the most dire circumstances. So even if we ordered them for someone else, to their spec, we would make welcome profits.

The other, oddly orthodox observation is: we have no other viable option. We cannot get 777 aircraft soon enough to make a difference, nor in large enough numbers. That is a game for 2021 at the earliest...two generations of MBA grads in the future. The same is true for the viable versions of the A350.

Despite its smallish payload, the 787-9 could be a bridge to the future...our option book is big enough to sell a few slots and still take enough hulls to actually expand the airline while our 2022 aeroplanes are being built.

On the other hand my wife may be slipping Prozac into my tea. Reckon?
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 20:57
  #908 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Commiserations to those demoted. That many will never be Captains again in Australia is a very sobering thought.

In my case I have had to uproot my family and move interstate, but at least I kept my LHS.

Still it appears many are actually happy at this despicable turn of events. Last night I was at the Coogee Bay having a couple of quiet schooies. Sitting in the booth next to me was group of loud and very pissed blokes who, based on the conversations I couldn't but help hear, were Jetstar Captains and F/O's.

At one point in proceedings, the demotions of QF Capts and F/Os was mentioned. One individuals offered that "its about time those guys got what they deserved"

To my amazement, I saw all others at the table express verbal or physical agreement.

I dont know why I am surprised, but it saddens me that Australian pilots take so much joy in the demise of others.

On other matters, I found the HOFOs comments on his blog highly offensive also. It shows how utterly out of touch with reality the current crop of mahogany row dwellers are.

If him and his cronies had any cojones at all they would have stood up and properly represented the pilot group to senior management.
mohikan is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 21:08
  #909 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: brisbane
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Qantas group will get 787-900. There is no chance a Qantas mainline pilot will be flying them.
qfpaypacket is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 21:15
  #910 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mo, if the current crop of mahogany row dwellers had any cojones they wouldn't have 'stood up and represented' the pilots, they would have stood up and walked!
Full Flapper is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 21:27
  #911 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
mohikan, the same Jetstar people you speak of at the Coogee Bay have been gifted everything on a platter, and have been around 5 minutes to achieve it. They'll be the ones complaining soon when Cobham and Network start undercutting them. It sickens me that people who work for the same mob joke about other peoples issues, in this case over seventy people being demoted. At the same time they get all the new 787 equipment and scores more 320s to cannibalise alot of former mainline routes. Sickening.
Autobrakes4 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 21:46
  #912 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The Qantas group will get 787-900. There is no chance a Qantas mainline pilot will be flying them
Mainline pilots will fly them, just not on the LH WD. Conditions will still be better than jetstar though....


I couldn't but help hear, were Jetstar Captains and F/O's.

At one point in proceedings, the demotions of QF Capts and F/Os was mentioned. One individuals offered that "its about time those guys got what they deserved"
if they were smart (clear not) they'd be discussing how they could avoid being in the same position (their time is coming.......)

Knowing quite a few JQ Capts and FO's, I haven't yet had one say they are comfortable about their positions, in fact, quite the opposite. They are petrified because they know as soon as this mob of idiots leaves the building, the next ones will be growing the profitable part of the business...ie mainline (I'm talking domestic here..) They are well aware that JQ will be a short lived exercise at its current size. Probably worth remembering that although there are some absolute morons (like the CBH crew sounded) at JQ (and QF etc etc) they don't represent the majority of crew.

IMO, the biggest threat to QF/JQ/QL pilots are Cobham. As per the FSO...im sure they'll be welcomed to the jumpseat of a QF/JQ/QL aircraft on staff travel...

Last edited by goodonyamate; 15th Jul 2014 at 21:50. Reason: slip of the tongue......
goodonyamate is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 22:36
  #913 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TIBA
Posts: 461
Received 129 Likes on 37 Posts
This whole debacle makes a mockery of the Company tenet

wisdom of experience
At least they can claim to be adhering to another

Contempory Australia
CaptCloudbuster is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2014, 22:47
  #914 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, for the record, I have a great deal of sympathy for my Qantas counterparts, I have never heard anyone in Jetstar rubbish a Qantas pilot. I have heard plenty of people talk with green envy about their pay though.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 01:06
  #915 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
At one point in proceedings, the demotions of QF Capts and F/Os was mentioned. One individuals offered that "its about time those guys got what they deserved"
I didn't know RK frequented the CBH! Thought he was too busy hanging out at fictional coffee shops
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 01:32
  #916 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Qantas Sale Act amendments about to be passed this week. Simon Hickey arrived back from China today.

Coincidence?
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 05:04
  #917 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
It's a windup. Jetstar pilots can't afford to drink at the CBH. They'd be down on the beach sharing a cask.
The The is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 05:34
  #918 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What a load of crap.

No one in Jetstar that I know is happy to see what is happening at QF. Don't forget many of us are QF pilots on LWOP, MOU pilots or on letters of intent. Probably half the pilot group being conservative. Most of us grew up wanting to work for Qantas. The simple truth is a whole generation of pilots won't get that chance, as Qantas haven't hired since early 2008. It's not the Qantas pilots fault. It's executive management plain and simple. It doesn't often help though with many Qantas pilots having a high sense of self entitlement and acting like they, and only they can fly jets safely in Australia.

We all know a change of management will have a change of strategy. I said it when Jetstar first started. They will be wearing a Qantas hat in 5 years. It's taken a little longer but it will either happen. Maybe Jetstar will be sold to a cashed up buyer and probably destroy Qantas anyway. I don't think Qantas can afford to sell Jetstar Australia, but they also can't afford to keep it. The horse has bolted and Jetstar is here to stay. At least in Australia.

I'd expect to see 789s flown by Jetstar crew in Qantas colours probably based offshore to circumvent the industrial agreements. They may even be based onshore. It could be why management are very keen for a second officer rate in the new EBA for heavy crewed flights. Seems like a lot of trouble to go to for the current medium haul......It could also be why training slots in Singapore for the Qantas group are already booked to 2019 for 787s. Well in excess of a dozen airframes.

Oh and contrary to popular Qantas belief, the 788s are absolutely chockers on every flight.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 05:43
  #919 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: toontown
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blueskymine,
BS. JQ staff will never successfully work in a QF uniform. The culture and mentality is LCC and simply wearing a QF hat will not change that. There is no way the staff I have seen at Jetstar will ever move away from LCC mentality and if QF do decide to go down that path QF is more screwed than it is today. Extremely unlikely to happen and management realise the limitations of the JQ culture.
Your also wrong about the SO rate for JQ. That's to stop the movement of current 320 F/O's to the wide body to facilitate 3 crew to HNL. Just hire an SO rather than upgrade a current FO.
Your talking crap also about the 788's being full. My contacts with people that actually fly them is that the loads are poor. Stop dreaming.
outside limits is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2014, 05:54
  #920 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Outside limits what's a LCC mentality? The aeroplane must fly differently at Qantas because it has business class.

I mean come on, you're clutching at straws. I suppose Virgin Blue must have used voodoo or something.

Your contacts say they're empty hey? Well how about speaking to the actual guys that fly them! (sic)

I'm assuming you have staff travel? Try and get a seat. The loads are there for you to see. It's not a great mystery.
Blueskymine is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.