Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

next virgin blue ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Mar 2014, 05:55
  #41 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
YMEN could take a 737 or 320 could it?
Seeing as it used to take 727-200 it's hard to consider that it couldn't take 737/A320.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2014, 07:40
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm talking about the 1970's facilities not the runways, been there lately?
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2014, 09:16
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does it currently operate RPT flights? Do they have the necessary security and passenger handling facilities? I'm not familiar with the airport, but their website suggests that they don't.

If not, would they want to go there? Has anyone asked them? They may be happy doing their thing wrt corporate jets and GA . Moving to RPT jet ops opens up a huge, expensive can of legislative worms, not to mention requirements for automated baggage handling systems, GHS contractors/equipment, check in and parking.

If an established operator like Virgin or Qantas turned up with a plan then maybe they would, but otherwise they'd have to invest a large amount of money on infrastructure upgrades (and a masssive amount of time complying with the legislative requirements) on a promise from an untested new airline.

Many people and organizations who spent money on stuff based on promises from untested new RPT airlines are still paying off the bills , so I wouldn't blame Essendon for being a bit cautious.

Last edited by Worrals in the wilds; 13th Mar 2014 at 09:51.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2014, 21:13
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't that like Darwin?

JQ planned to use Darwin as the launching pad for services to Asia.

Opened a base only to close it down.

Wanted all the infrastructure in place but didn't want to pay for it.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 03:23
  #45 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
doesn't have to mean 737 or 320. Could use smaller jets.
XPT is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 03:25
  #46 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
think Alliance currently operate F70's & F100's in & out of MEB.

Why would they need automated baggage systems ?

Most business types have no checked baggage & that's where the $$$ are.

There's no money in leisure pax. Leisure pax just fill up the aircraft.
XPT is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 04:26
  #47 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
under 20,000 kgs MTOW don't need to worry about security.

That covers plenty of aircraft types, inc 36 seater jets.

Also very quick to get on & off a 36 seater & at MEB no queues for everything.
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 07:49
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You do if it's an RPT operation. The 20,000 kg waiver only applies to charter operations.
From the regulations;

4.02 Meaning of screened air service
(1) An aircraft must be a cleared aircraft before departure if it is operating a regular public transport operation or an open charter operation with a maximum weight of at least 20 000 kg.
Aviation Transport Security Regulations 2005
Most business types have no checked baggage & that's where the $$$ are.
In my experience they like to have the option available, even if they don't always use it.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 08:49
  #49 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so under 20k no security .

so u can carry luggage . pax can carry it to aircraft
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:15
  #50 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeh Worrals in the wilds did you fail english comprehension at school ?

4.02 1) ....... maximum weight of at least 20 000 kg.

So under 20k no b/s security required - one massive saving
XPT is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:37
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The AUK
Age: 80
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates business plan is not about buying old Airlines or starting new Airlines.
Why buy a dead horse, when you have the 'where with all' to simply move in and do it your own way, with a fleet of your own choice. No brainer really.

Last edited by The Big E; 14th Mar 2014 at 10:01. Reason: Missed out the Quote.
The Big E is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:44
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The AUK
Age: 80
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't that like Darwin?
Just ask Alan, as he thought that he had figured it all out. Just like the mess
he has been making of QF since he has had his current job.
The Big E is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:53
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The AUK
Age: 80
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did that have an impact on their profit?
In a word YES. Someone has to pay the bill, and generally they who place the Technical Directive also place an obligation on their employer or owner to pay.
The Big E is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:57
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The AUK
Age: 80
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That covers plenty of aircraft types, inc 36 seater jets.
If you do the math for short haul stuff, there is no way that 36 seater Jets can compete with turboprops. Just look at why ATRs are creaming the rest.
The Big E is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 09:58
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeh Worrals in the wilds did you fail english comprehension at school ?
(1) An aircraft must be a cleared aircraft before departure if it is operating a regular public transport operation or an open charter operation with a maximum weight of at least 20 000 kg.
The OR is the key. If it is an RPT OR over 20 000kg it requires screening.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 10:52
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Queensland
Age: 40
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Worrals,
I think the backlash against you is a bit harsh as I can understand your interpretation of the rules due to its often poor wording. However there are several unscreened RPT flights operated everyday across the country in aircraft ranging from C208s to Dash 8s and the like.
Check_Thrust is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:02
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why bother with forming an airline ? Just sell the muffins instead.
Metro man is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:23
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check Thrust; thanks and interesting. Do you refer to regional/remote services?

My understanding was that all RPT flights now required screening and that several regional ports had to spend considerable money to comply, even though their RPT service was only a twice weekly Metro or Dash 8.
Maybe there is room to move if the Minister gives his authority? Or maybe (and more likely ) the regulation is not fully enforced, particularly in regional areas?

I'm assuming they fit the definition below and openly sell tickets to the public for a fixed schedule, not just a few covert tickets for the spare seats on what's officially a FIFO charter . I'm sure you're aware of the definition but I'm not so sure about some of our fellow contributors.

regular public transport operation means an operation of an aircraft for the purposes of the carriage of people, or both people and goods, of an air service that:
(a) is provided for a fee payable by persons using the service; and
(b) is available to the general public on a regular basis; and
(c) is conducted in accordance with fixed schedules to or from fixed terminals over specific routes.
ATSR 1.03
Why bother with forming an airline ? Just sell the muffins instead.
Agreed.


Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 11:46
  #59 (permalink)  
DTS
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear NADeals!

Timing is not perfect for a low cost player to enter the Aus Market
JQd is losing money
VAd is losing money
Tiger is losing money

The only domestic airline making money is QF and that's a full service airline that is now slowly starting to take back a few JQ routes

I am still waiting for your previous prediction of VA to "go broke"

Funnily enough the real pros SQ, EY, NZ see VA good enough to chuck significant amounts of cash in.
DTS is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2014, 12:52
  #60 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ever heard of Rex ?


They're making money.


Most of their ports except SYD, MEL, ADL & DBO - no security(fight at Dubbo, due to QF introducing bigger aircraft)


Someone like them could get a new aircraft type perhaps & aim at the business market from alternative airports like MEB.
BNEA320 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.