Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Ch7 reports Jetstar First!

Old 16th Oct 2013, 08:29
  #1 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ch7 reports Jetstar First!

Local Ch 7 FNQ News has just reported on the arrival in CNS today of Jetstar's 787, which according to the news is bigger better, flys higher faster further AND also reduces turbulence!

Can any 787 pilots provide a précis of the TRS (Turbulence Reduction System) please?
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 08:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 257
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
I think it's been covered in one of the other JQ787 bashing threads already Clarrie. It's similar to a load alleviation function I think. PS don't take everything you see/hear/read in the media literally :-)
Boomerang is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 09:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is also 'self maintaining' and even flies itself, so no more pesky pilots and engineers required! Once AJ has worked out how to minimise fuel there won't be a need for a Brisbane or Townsville refueller either! And lastly the new age aircraft doesn't require CASA oversight, surveillance or inspections either so you don't even have to add it to an AOC! Brilliant! Amaaaaazing!

But seriously with all jokes aside I wish them well. At least someone in aviation still has a job for now. Stay safe boys.

Last edited by Cactusjack; 16th Oct 2013 at 09:05.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 09:10
  #4 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,877
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
There seems to be a misconception in the media as to just how big the 787 is. I saw one report claiming that the 787 was a 747 replacement for the BA fleet. A lot of media outlets seem to assume the thing is huge.
SOPS is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 09:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney Harbour
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw one at KLAX recently. Beautiful lines but not a big beastie!
Dangly Bits is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 09:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The media probably picked it up on Jetstar's promo.

Exhibit A: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=3&theater
0tto is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 10:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
787

Its smaller than a 767-300 and from the front ugly looks like a 1950's Comet...
with JQ 335 seating config its sardine time...even Boeing advised them max config would be 260 but AJ wants more Bogons on the Orange Lemon Eight Lemon...
Goddamnslacker is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 10:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's still more plane fodder for the inept media to postulate over as the A350 will be along in the near future & if they are calling the 7ate7 big wait 'till they see the new French pig they'll positively go ape sh1t over it !
Watched an AI 7ate7 depart ML the other day, gee those wings flex upon rotation like they do on my toy planes:-)
Whom ever said the 7ate7 is ugly re the Comet nose I couldn't agree more, dead ringer for the Comet.

It really is the Ford/Holden thingy here with each other trying to out do each other.


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2013, 12:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Exiled in the Ukraine
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it really is the Ford/Holden thingy here with each other trying to out do each other.
And like Ford/Holden also trying to impress the Bogans.
Stalins ugly Brother is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 00:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don't the media get excited, trying to get the big scoop...

There are Cruise Flaps, that reduce drag by automatically & symmetrically moving flap, flaperons, spoilers & ailerons to vary the camber & hence cruise performance (according to Wt, airspeed & Alt).

A Gust Suppression system is also active which smooths out the pax ride/bumps/turbulence but the Autodrag function on approach, if high on the G/S, increases turb (wake) by extending ailerons & outboard spoilers while maintaining airspeed until slope capture...

Their airframes aren't that huge either, alongside a Tripla or 767 as previously mentioned, but never let the truth get in the way of a good story. The wings (esp TKOF) and their sweep back are the most striking aspects too.
Chocks Away is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 00:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
from the front ugly looks like a 1950's Comet.
I rise in defence of the Comet (and therefore the Caravelle). It may have had many faults but ugliness wasn't one of them (IMHO).

Rgds
Fris B. Fairing is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 01:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And judging by the yout@be vid of the first on arriving in MEL, you don't flare it either...
grrowler is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 01:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like the media aren't the only ones who are ignorant as to the where the B787 fits into the Boeing 'size' basket (Goddamslacker);

B763 v B788 = 54.9m v 56.7m (I assume you're referring to length as blind-freddy can tell there's no confusion as to width and wingspan...).

As for those wondering about the relative sizes of the JQ widebody fleet, the A332 is 58.8m in length. Airbus fuselage width is 5.64m and that of the B788 is 5.77m - yet they squeeze 10% more punters into the newbie! Ouch!
RAD_ALT_ALIVE is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 06:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 281
Received 47 Likes on 25 Posts
Airbus have had a load alleviation function for yonks. Boeing is playing catchup again.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 09:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They fit more in simply because they have reduced Business Class from 38 in the A330 to 21. The galley's are also smaller than the aforementioned aircraft.

Quite straight-forward really...
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 10:12
  #16 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,877
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
335 in a 787? Wow, they are really packing them in!
SOPS is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 10:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 28
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Economy seating

I managed to go through the aircraft this afternoon on Cairns. Seating config is 3 x 3 x 3. I'm not big by any stretch, 5'10 and sitting "normally" my knees touch the seat in front. I also pax'd on a Dash 300 today. A lot more leg room on the Dash.

I couldn't imagine a ML/HNL with the kids being much fun at all!!
Omega471 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 12:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Age: 48
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh great.

Can see the day when we'll all have to stand and hold a bar or a strap even long haul.
ruddman is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 14:09
  #19 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,877
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
Well, I hope the great unwashed enjoy the ride.
SOPS is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 15:38
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least the higher, faster part is true.

335? They can't fly fast enough.
ferris is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.