Ground collision YMML - Virgin/Jetstar
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Inside their OODA loop
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
framer, correct. Trading redundancy for efficiency is simply moving money from one managers pile to another, it doesn't necessarily change the profitability one iota. However, it is possible to get a short term profit bump until the inevitable costly incident occurs.
Insurance may well payout in this case. However, repeated claims would see the premium the insurers change increase. My understanding is insurance companies drove enormous change at Korean Air Lines after the large number of accidents and the Delta audit.
Insurance may well payout in this case. However, repeated claims would see the premium the insurers change increase. My understanding is insurance companies drove enormous change at Korean Air Lines after the large number of accidents and the Delta audit.
Nunc est bibendum
There could be multiple issues here.
1. Was it a domestic VOZ or international? Domestic we pass on instructions to the driver. Internationally it's direct to the driver.
2. How congested was the SMC frequency for the JQ crew to call 'holding short' of the bay? I've had numerous occasions in MEL where I can't get a word in to request taxi (or advise holding short) due to SMC also reading our an airways clearance and so on. It would indeed be a tragedy if this prang was contributed to by lack of ATCOs.
3.Agree with EWL about having your own staff with a perception of having their own 'skin' in the game (or at least the metal owned by 'their' employer). I'd be very interested to see how the training of the pushbackers at VOZ and other sub contracting companies compares with legacy training. Same? Different? Longer? Shorter? HF issues covered? etc.
1. Was it a domestic VOZ or international? Domestic we pass on instructions to the driver. Internationally it's direct to the driver.
2. How congested was the SMC frequency for the JQ crew to call 'holding short' of the bay? I've had numerous occasions in MEL where I can't get a word in to request taxi (or advise holding short) due to SMC also reading our an airways clearance and so on. It would indeed be a tragedy if this prang was contributed to by lack of ATCOs.
3.Agree with EWL about having your own staff with a perception of having their own 'skin' in the game (or at least the metal owned by 'their' employer). I'd be very interested to see how the training of the pushbackers at VOZ and other sub contracting companies compares with legacy training. Same? Different? Longer? Shorter? HF issues covered? etc.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just glad no one got hurt.
take care of yourselves and your colleagues out there fellas, because all the casa box ticking and company policy and safety manuals that these clowns dream up aren't going to.
let mgmnt worry about the $
take care of yourselves and your colleagues out there fellas, because all the casa box ticking and company policy and safety manuals that these clowns dream up aren't going to.
let mgmnt worry about the $
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From an email earlier today
"TheJetstar aircraft was holding about 10 metres short of the gate becauseeither there was no marshaller present or the aero bridge wasn't positioned.
Directlyopposite (behind it) was the Virgin 737. It's gate is a little difficult topush from because the aircraft is up against the wall.
Virginhaven't used Engineers to push out their aircraft using Power Push Units for awhile. They use TA's now. I can't understand how the person operating the PPUon the Virgin aircraft wouldn't have sited the Jetstar aircraft behind him.
Evenso with Jetstar having it's red beacons on the push shouldn't have commencedfor the Virgin aircraft until Jetstar has extinguished his beacons which wouldhave meant he was at the gate and not holding short.
Oneof our other push out drivers was in the tug waiting to push one of ourcustomer's aircraft at the time. He told me that he didn't hear the Virginaircraft call up for his push clearance when the incident happened."
Regarding insurance, the airports insurance cover will also be involved but judging by the amount of damage caused it could well come within the respective airlines excess/deductible.
I recall a small Apron tower at Tulla years ago atop one of the fingers.
Must have been a good reason for it when they built Tulla & back then it was a country Airport compared to today's disorganized mess.
The new taxiway works for the new pending terminal to the Sth will create chaos so perhaps this little current Mr Meaner is a sign!
Wmk2
Must have been a good reason for it when they built Tulla & back then it was a country Airport compared to today's disorganized mess.
The new taxiway works for the new pending terminal to the Sth will create chaos so perhaps this little current Mr Meaner is a sign!
Wmk2
Keg;
2. How congested was the SMC frequency for the JQ crew to call 'holding short' of the bay? I've had numerous occasions in MEL where I can't get a word in to request taxi (or advise holding short) due to SMC also reading our an airways clearance and so on. It would indeed be a tragedy if this prang was contributed to by lack of ATCOs.
I arrived at MEL shortly before this happened. Despite rwys 34 and 27 being duty rays, 27 was doing it all. There was huge congestion physically and on SMC. Garuda was doing it's own thing, and taxying wherever they wanted, AirAsia forgot to park, and needed to be pushed 3m back, JitConnect didn't know where they were parked and China Eastern were just happy to be here.
We spent over 20 minutes getting from clear or 27 and onto the bay... It was busy.
2. How congested was the SMC frequency for the JQ crew to call 'holding short' of the bay? I've had numerous occasions in MEL where I can't get a word in to request taxi (or advise holding short) due to SMC also reading our an airways clearance and so on. It would indeed be a tragedy if this prang was contributed to by lack of ATCOs.
I arrived at MEL shortly before this happened. Despite rwys 34 and 27 being duty rays, 27 was doing it all. There was huge congestion physically and on SMC. Garuda was doing it's own thing, and taxying wherever they wanted, AirAsia forgot to park, and needed to be pushed 3m back, JitConnect didn't know where they were parked and China Eastern were just happy to be here.
We spent over 20 minutes getting from clear or 27 and onto the bay... It was busy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oddly it was last Wed that the ALAEA received a letter from Virgin declaring their intent to reduce the number of Engineers in Mel to make way for more tarmac responsibility to be passed to Ramp staff.
Yes anyone can make a mistake but there are some key differences. No Engineer will push a plane back for at least 4 years and the average one will have over 20 years experience. Rampies can be pushing aircraft out after 6 weeks, for most it is just a job until they find something better or their backs are shot.
This would not have happened if they used Wing Walkers. The requirement for Wing Walkers on congested aprons is outlined in the respective aircraft Maintenance Manuals. Rampies cannot access Maintenance Manuals.
I'm looking forward to my Tues meeting with them.
Yes anyone can make a mistake but there are some key differences. No Engineer will push a plane back for at least 4 years and the average one will have over 20 years experience. Rampies can be pushing aircraft out after 6 weeks, for most it is just a job until they find something better or their backs are shot.
This would not have happened if they used Wing Walkers. The requirement for Wing Walkers on congested aprons is outlined in the respective aircraft Maintenance Manuals. Rampies cannot access Maintenance Manuals.
I'm looking forward to my Tues meeting with them.
Make sure you mention that they were only a meter or so away from an APU disintegrating and APU fuel lines unloading onto 500degree metal. Maybe remind them of the BA A320 cowl latch cock up a few months back as well. The next thing you know we will have supermarket trolley collectors being head hunted for the job.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eagles Nest
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You seem those trolley collectors at work , 200 trolleys together being pushed by one person operating an electric motorized pusher . Usually at speed through automatic doors and between people .
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: OS
Age: 65
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Swiss Cheese - yet again,
Cost cutting to reduce manpower,
Low cost airline turn around times,
ATC congestion on frequencies,
JQ crew unannounced holding short,
SMC not aware to caution VOZ,
PB driver in a hurry to go to the next A/C.
It's the day all the holes line up...
Low cost airline turn around times,
ATC congestion on frequencies,
JQ crew unannounced holding short,
SMC not aware to caution VOZ,
PB driver in a hurry to go to the next A/C.
It's the day all the holes line up...
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engineers" will not guarantee that this type of incident will not happen again as they are as fallible as the next human being....
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look I've been a LAME for 20+ years and involved in 1000's of pushbacks. I really think it is down to common sense, if it looks too close - check. I've got nothing against to ground handlers carrying out pushback. I would rather be well paid for my core work...
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Antipodes
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ALAEA Sec. Yes I did read and did understand and also take your point on experience. Experience has to start somewhere though and requires a platform of good training. However my point is also correct, human beings are fallible and the industry has a history of where even the best training (perhaps what was missing in this incident?) and experience does not prevent accidents or people not adhering to SOP's, irrespective of how qualified they are in their field.
I recall a case where a LAME in MEL took out the stanchions of what is now the Virgin Domestic Concourse whilst driving a PBT. The building suffered severe structural damage and fortunately no one was physically hurt, some shocked staff and passengers though.The LAME was licensed to drive the equipment, was very experienced in PBT operations, yet ignored SOP's on two counts, the speed limit and the environment of where the machinery was being operated.
Tragically and sometimes fatally, some issues arise where training or precautions are not taken into account or even considered necessary in an airport environment with people assuming that others will not endanger their own lives or of others, as "common sense" will prevail. It doesn't. Common sense is not common with some humans, a human fallibility.
From a staff utilisation perspective, it is rational not to use Engineers, they are simply too expensive for such tasks and I agree with Whitebait. Use them on core functions of their valuable knowledge and qualifications.
I recall a case where a LAME in MEL took out the stanchions of what is now the Virgin Domestic Concourse whilst driving a PBT. The building suffered severe structural damage and fortunately no one was physically hurt, some shocked staff and passengers though.The LAME was licensed to drive the equipment, was very experienced in PBT operations, yet ignored SOP's on two counts, the speed limit and the environment of where the machinery was being operated.
Tragically and sometimes fatally, some issues arise where training or precautions are not taken into account or even considered necessary in an airport environment with people assuming that others will not endanger their own lives or of others, as "common sense" will prevail. It doesn't. Common sense is not common with some humans, a human fallibility.
From a staff utilisation perspective, it is rational not to use Engineers, they are simply too expensive for such tasks and I agree with Whitebait. Use them on core functions of their valuable knowledge and qualifications.
You don't have to be a LAME to be a good pushback operator, and I have seen some real pros in action.. But you DO need to have a professional attitude. There are, or used to be at least, some real pros. It's is a skill in its own right to be a good rampie and its a bloody hard job. A10 min a/c walkaround doesn't give you the full experience of being on the ramp for hrs. Its either hot or cold, dry or wet, allways noisy and allways dangerous and on top of that it's physically demanding. Nowdays you have the pressure of the boss wanting things done double quick because you are doing double the flights with half the staff of even a few years ago.
But the one worrying thing is, staff turnover. Its not unusual to talk to a rampie who has 4 months experience and he or she is the most experianced person on the crew.
But the one worrying thing is, staff turnover. Its not unusual to talk to a rampie who has 4 months experience and he or she is the most experianced person on the crew.
