Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar 787's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2013, 02:15
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YMML
Age: 32
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ASY68 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 02:39
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brisbane
Posts: 407
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
New Mod

Heard Boeing is offering a mod to best deal with all the fires.....

A Chimney....
greenslopes is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 05:40
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coming out of the paintshop.
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 14:29
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just curious as to what would be the normal pathway for Jetstar pilots to get on the 787 fleet? Will it be purely based on seniority? And if so, would this mean no chance for new recruits to start on the 787?
training wheels is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 18:53
  #65 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,879
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
Pity it's not in Qantas colours.
SOPS is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 20:09
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed - Qantas obviously should have first had the 777 years ago and now should be the first to fly the OZ flag on the 787. Sadly not to be due to years and years of mismanagement and myopia in a fast-changing airline landscape...

Love the Jetstar paintscheme on the 787. Very well done. The 787 pilots will be justifiably proud of that bird. Is there any initial destination list for the 787 (first few destinations replacing the A330s)? Singapore, Bali and Honolulu?

Last edited by Iver; 10th Aug 2013 at 20:11.
Iver is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 23:03
  #67 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Whats the bet that J* market heavily the 787 going to HNL. Of course on the same day you'll have QF passengers going there on the 767. Whilst the product isn't too different it speaks volumes that QF can continue to turn a profit with a 767. Imagine how much better we could be doing with the new metal and an upgraded product.
Keg is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2013, 23:37
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks Good.

I bet there are plenty of Jetstar guys at full mast at the moment.

Meanwhile at the QF camp its viagra all around.

tenretni is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 01:02
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Last edited by 2Plus; 11th Aug 2013 at 01:03. Reason: 'Cos one wasn't enough.
2Plus is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 01:35
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
But look, are they white engine nacelles? Still hope yet that sense will prevail.
The The is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 02:27
  #71 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Is there any initial destination list for the 787
probably back to the hangar......

looks good, still jetstar product inside though.
goodonyamate is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 03:56
  #72 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,175
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by The The
But look, are they white engine nacelles? Still hope yet that sense will prevail.
Boeing said engine nacelles are only available in white to maintain laminar flow, then BA got blue.

Last edited by swh; 11th Aug 2013 at 03:57.
swh is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 04:10
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg

I actually applaud the arrival of JQ's 787's.

This will trigger the return of ex JQ A330's back to the Qantas mainline operation.

I'm sure your no doubt aware that internal QF group agreements disallow the same aircraft type to operate on the same city pair.

That's the reason why Qantas can't put an A330 on the HNL route until JQ are exclusively 787's on that route.

Have you ever wondered why an A330 hasnt been scheduled on the HNL route even with very high load factors.

I am of the opinion that the 787's to JQ first is nothing more than a marketing ploy and the byproduct also being reduced fuel costs.

If anything, sending the 787's to JQ first shows the resilience of the Qantas brand. Mainline B767's continue to fly to HNL full. If the QF International business truly was in terminal decline & with fuel it's major costs. The 787's would have gone to mainline first if it really needed turning around ASAP.

In the July edition of the JQ in flight magazine Jane Hrdlicka promotes the arrival of the JQ 787's as the beginning of a new era in inflight comfort.

Does anyone honestly believe being shoehorned into a JQ 787 as a comfortable experience.

I can assure you six months after the arrival of the 787 and the associated issues of introducing a new aircraft type. There will still be delays, no change to load factors and mainline charters to cover JQ unserviceabilities or cancelations to HNL. But QF will be able to send an A330.

MC
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 11:09
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
787 wont be going to HNL. Jetstar will be hanging onto 4 A330's to cover that flying.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 12:36
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As of July 2013 Jane Hrdlicka was stating JQ 787's to AKL, SIN, NRT & HNL.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 18:25
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 133
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
]I'm sure your no doubt aware that internal QF group agreements disallow the same aircraft type to operate on the same city pair.

Really? Seems that someone hasn't got that memo. I have often operated SIN-MEL in a QF330 some 5 mins behind JQ8 - another A330
OhSpareMe is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2013, 23:14
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh spare me.

I concede you are correct.

Perhaps the internal agreements are being unwound since Hickeys arrival at international or have expired.

Hopefully sanity it's starting to prevail.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 07:19
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
From what I've heard from various sources MC the first 787's don't have the legs to go to HNL with the same load and freight capacity as the 330. Maybe JH made her announcement before commercial understood that just because the nice aeroplane salesman says it will take so many people so many miles with so much freight they forgot to mention that it can't do it all at the same time!
Lookleft is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 09:16
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lookleft.

Maybe someone should tell Hrdlicka & marketing.

I just went back over the online version of the Jetstar inflight mag (July & August)

It definitely states the 787 to HNL and ALL JQ Longhaul destinations served by the 787 by 2015.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2013, 09:28
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 57
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lookleft
From what I've heard from various sources MC the first 787's don't have the legs to go to HNL with the same load and freight capacity as the 330. Maybe JH made her announcement before commercial understood that just because the nice aeroplane salesman says it will take so many people so many miles with so much freight they forgot to mention that it can't do it all at the same time!
Maybe by announcing it, trying it. having it fall short they maximise their legal compensation?
Romulus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.