Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Medical Privacy

Old 11th Dec 2012, 07:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Medical Privacy

Seems QF have been trying to compel pilots to disclose their medical diagnosis, prognosis and expected return to work date under threat of disciplinary action.

After some time in FWA QF have gone away to "clarify" their position.

I knew JQ flight attendant managers had been ringing doctors directly for this information, but with the exception of 1 had not heard of this nonsense being applied to the pilots.

Last edited by waren9; 11th Dec 2012 at 20:18.
waren9 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2012, 09:32
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,395
Received 181 Likes on 108 Posts
We are not all Qantas/Jetstar employees or even airline employees.

Would you care to explain in greater detail so we at least have some vague idea what you may be talking about????
tail wheel is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2012, 21:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny QLD
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our loving managers are demanding pilots on sick leave divulge to fleet manager nature of illness.
ejectx3 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 02:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That is outrageous!!!
Tell them any attempt to access your records without your express "voluntary" written permission on an individual case by case basis will be met with legal action.
If you tell the company you expect to be off for "approx XXX number of days" based on the info you have of your condition and expected recovery time, that's it, all they need to know.
Yeah, I bet they went to get legal counsel and "clarify" their position after stepping right into it.

Last edited by aussie027; 12th Dec 2012 at 02:38.
aussie027 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 02:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: australasia
Posts: 430
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Must be a QANTAS thing.

IAC Pacific, company of ex QANTAS employee Moxham, tried to do the same to me. When I refused to comply they docked me about $500 USD per month (for a couple of years) for being uncooperative.

The Vanuatu courts saw it differently. Something about withholding monies without lawful excuse.

Maui

Last edited by maui; 12th Dec 2012 at 03:05.
maui is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 05:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,088
Received 148 Likes on 33 Posts
The timing on this is intriguing.

Sick leave normally ticks up in the lead up to Christmas - especially when morale and engagement are as appallingly low as they are at the moment. Management make nasty noises about sick leave two weeks out from Christmas. Some interesting context for this can be gleaned from one of the manager's blogs (sorry, for those who don't have access to it).

Who says management are purely reactive?
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 05:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,067
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Who says management are purely reactive?
That still doesn't make it legal. A phone call from the fair work ombudsman will stop the line of proactive inquiry fairly promptly I would imagine.

Last edited by neville_nobody; 12th Dec 2012 at 05:39.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 06:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 999
Received 29 Likes on 18 Posts
For a long period of absence I had to have an employer's form completed by the doc. In the space where it said 'Nature of illness", my GP wrote "Illness". This was not queried by the employer.
Hydromet is online now  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 06:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,088
Received 148 Likes on 33 Posts
Neville, I never said it was legal. The mere hint of such action may be enough to force those planning on being sick over Chrissy to reconsider their actions. Objective achieved for management.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 09:43
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
if they ask for yours
ask to see Joyce's medical reports
ozbiggles is online now  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 10:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is highly likely that any Australian doctor being asked by an employer to divulge the nature of an employee's illness would tell that employer, one way or another, to "sod off".

The only exception to this is a Workcover claim. Then the employer has full rights to know the nature of the illness.

In the medical profession, releasing this information to an employer without the permission of the patient is viewed extremely seriously - in fact it is viewed as professional misconduct and can bring very serious repercussions to the doctor.

So it would be very unwise of Qantas to push the issue too far, or they might have a lot of egg land on their face.

What do I know? Not much. But my wife who is a doctor and former DAME does.

Last edited by DutchRoll; 12th Dec 2012 at 10:14.
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 13:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Airborne
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manager: "What is the nature of your illness?"

Employee: "My illness is of a nature that prevents me from coming to work."

End of story.
HF3000 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 20:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
As far as i know ATCs are required to inform ASA about the nature of the illness when they call in sick.

It is so they can judge if they are sick enough- if not you get reprimanded i believe. If you advise them you are sick because you are tired for whatever reason, you will be reprimanded for not preparing for duty. I guess they are looking to down size so any excuse will do. Save $$$$$$
mikk_13 is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 22:47
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 56
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geez you guys get worked up over nothing.
OzSync is online now  
Old 12th Dec 2012, 23:18
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Warm & Sunny
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OzSync; do you work in a back office somewhere, scratching your managers back perhaps, able to get up and go for a stroll when the pressure mounts, no responsibility, perhaps working out how many toothpicks and coasters Qantas will need to buy next year, then after such an arduous day, take it easy and wait for the weekend to roll by??

Role on....
Alien Role is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2012, 04:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,192
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by OzSync
No to all the above.

I do however have significant health issues and have no problem at all discussing them with my manager.

Admittedly, however, I don't consider myself a sky god, hence the slight ripple I have caused in the flow of this thread.
so you don't mind therefore everyone else should be ok with it? if not, sure, let your managers prod around in your own private matters? let the Corporatocracy roll on!

#gottabetrollin
maggot is online now  
Old 17th Dec 2012, 03:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell em you have a "social disease" probably picked up from the flight deck John, AND you are talking to your lawyer, that should do it! Do you know in my time at TAA if you called in crook, they sometimes would send a "company officer" around to cool your boiling brow, and of course half the time the blokes would be mowing the lawn or tinkering with the car. Thank God those days are over, they just send private detectives now.
teresa green is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2012, 09:21
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 86
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Admittedly, however, I don't consider myself a sky god, hence the slight ripple I have caused in the flow of this thread.
Immediate loss of credibility OzSync.

As for the whole "nature of illness thing", it works like this at QF (longhaul): If you go on sick leave for a period of time you are required to produce a certificate (stating the nature of illness) in order to access the sick leave entitlement . If you don't then you don't get paid. There is an exception of a maximum of 4 occasions or 7 days each year but even if availing one's self of that, you will not get paid the full pattern credit for any flying lost, it will be a lesser amount.

If I am sick, then I get a sick certificate - simple, and problem solved. Personal or sensitive matters can be discussed with company doctor who can then advise crewing that the matter is genuine and sick pay is warranted.

Last edited by Conductor; 19th Dec 2012 at 09:26.
Conductor is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2012, 09:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 86
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell em you have a "social disease" probably picked up from the flight deck
Recently heard a funny story from a fellow longhaul pilot who said that he called in sick and when asked about the nature of the illness, he said "I'm not sure what it's called and I hope the doctor can give me some cream for it. I can take a photo and send it in if you like". I think that had the desired effect.
Conductor is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2012, 18:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I was at QF as ground staff, all I put on my ck leave forms for the nature of illness was "as per certificate". As the certificate normally says "he/she was suffering from a medical condition" that is all they need to know.

As a pilot I would imagine the same would work, except for where they may ask if the condition will affect your aviation medical.
rammel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.