Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Gregg, Dixon, Carnegie, Singo make a play on QF

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Gregg, Dixon, Carnegie, Singo make a play on QF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Nov 2012, 02:27
  #21 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
And if you want to maintain the illusion of having a low cost carrier, you keep a few rows down the back as your 'Jetstar class' whereby they get nothing in terms of service unless they pay.
Keg is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 09:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Is there a connection between the Qantas chairman and the "investors"?

its most recent action against Newcrest, GCR has challenged the validity of the grant of ML1472, which covers a third of the giant Cadia East deposit. Behind GCR is a cabal of influential mining identities including the former Rio Tinto chief Leigh Clifford, founder of Barlow Jonker Jeremy Barlow, former Glencore and Xstrata chairman Willy Strothotte, and venture capitalist Mark Carnegie.

Read more: ]Newcrest gold mine licence challenged
Sunfish is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 11:15
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The rumour, if true, would herald a huge con by this group.

To be seen like white knights riding in to the rescue and buy up shares is just too bizarre.
To take a significant shareholding position in order to change the direction in which Qantas is going is strange.
These guys don't usually invest a lot of money in a high risk strategy like this, and the only reason I can see that they would do this on this occasion is to sell down these shares at later date to take profits.
Of course this not illegal, but certainly unethical if you have conned people into thinking that the company is now on track for better times and future dividends.
Good news no doubt for long suffering shareholders.
The tricky part might be in acquiring shares at a nice low price as a package, but wait... Qantas has been buying back a tidy $100 million of shares and I wonder if there would be an off market transaction.

Hmmmmm.....
AEROMEDIC is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 20:29
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Execute
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everybody wants something for nothing.....
Direct to is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 21:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
And if you want to maintain the illusion of having a low cost carrier, you keep a few rows down the back as your 'Jetstar class' whereby they get nothing in terms of service unless they pay.
This seems to work on the ANZ flights I've been on trans tasman. There are a range of economy fares, some that include meals some that don't. I believe Virgin Australia is doing something similar now as well.
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 22:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's a rumour floating around in some circles that Joyce is either about to jump or has been pushed...
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 22:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the staff are hanging on to any rumour like this and running with it.

I think there will be tears of joy if true, but the company may be so far up **** creek that even if true it will be a small moment of joy on the inevitable train smash set in motion a long time ago.

....anyway as much as I'd love it to be true, somehow I doubt it is.
blueloo is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 22:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Selling frequent flyers is not good for our business, just a quick way of pocketing some cash.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 23:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: closer to hell
Age: 52
Posts: 914
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Partial float of Jetstar...roll up roll up..5 QF shares for 1 JQ share makes it a cheap buy back
troppo is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2012, 23:15
  #30 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

Selling frequent flyers is not good for our business, just a quick way of pocketing some cash.
That would depend on whether we start to charge them a proper rate of return for the seats they 'buy' off us.
Keg is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 00:39
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
This is starting to sound like the movie 'Wall Street'. Except in this case it isn't pension funds but the cash that QF has on hand. Can't remember the figure but QF has tonnes of cash just lying around for a rainy day. That plus a few spin-offs are probably where Dixon et al are looking whilst playing the white knight card to the staff.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 01:35
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the purpose of the Board and CEO to serve each and every shareholder equally?
They are responsible to the shareholders' interests as a group, not individually (rather clear in case law). However under management ethics they are also responsible to stakeholders at different levels depending on their interests and effects on the interests (with the purpose in the long term still being the shareholders' interests).

It gets much more tricky with different shareholder classes and changes that may alter their effectiveness but that is not so much a day to day issue.
Phalanger is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 01:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydernee
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The things I remember most clearly about Gregg's tenure as CFO was how he got his ugly mug on the Teevee on a daily basis during the 2008 stoush with the LAME's. He was at pains to let the travelling public know that LAME's "weren't exactly the working poor" - when, clearly, we should be - and that we were making "a grab for cash" - all the while, pulling a massive salary out of the place himself... I can't wait to see him back in the joint

And Dicko, well, we remember this little stunt...
Qantas cops pay backlash


Oops, I tell a lie... It was Brown, the HR boss, that made the 'working poor' crack, not Gregg.

Last edited by Dunnocks; 20th Nov 2012 at 02:10.
Dunnocks is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 02:46
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Back to the Future

Crikey things must be grim if the prospect of Dixon making a return is seen as an improvement.

Quote from Singo:

Mr Singleton told Fairfax Media that, due to an overseas trip, he was unaware of takeover talk.

However, he stood by claims the airline has made recent management errors, including retaining Alan Joyce as chief executive.

''Who wouldn't be interested [in Qantas]?'' he told Fairfax. ''There is $3 billion in cash sitting in the bloody thing.''

Last edited by Taildragger67; 20th Nov 2012 at 03:26.
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 03:13
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
To be fair to Dixon... and this is through gritted teeth.... I don't think he ever envisaged the the situation we have today where QF International is being starved of investment to pay for Jetstar Asia and Jetstar International.

I think he may get some influence again, and this will be solely to line his own pockets, but if as a consequence Qantas gets back to being Qantas again, I won't whinge too much.
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 03:46
  #36 (permalink)  

Don Quixote Impersonator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink Sometimes D&G is pure gold

If I had the money, I would be buying QF like there was no tomorrow.

A management clean out is inevitable with a return to focus on looking after the staff and passengers.

There is, for the moment, maybe, just enough left of what made it a great Australian carrier.

But not for long.

BTW posters congratulations on keeping this thread a and gratuitous reviler free zone.
gaunty is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 04:52
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gregg, Dixon, Carnegie, Singo make a play on QF

Considering two of the alleged participants have no knowledge of it and the rest haven't said a word, I smell a big stinking red rat behind this story...
Hempy is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 05:41
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Kapt Kremin

To be fair to Dixon... and this is through gritted teeth.... I don't think he ever envisaged the the situation we have today where QF International is being starved of investment to pay for Jetstar Asia and Jetstar International.
It was Dixon that formed Jetstar through Orange Star Holdings in Asia. He together with Jackson. It was also he that said Jetstar won't cannibalise QANTAS routes and it was under him that Jetstar commenced cannibalising QANTAS routes.

Dixon almost climaxed with Jackson when they announced the sale of QANTAS back in '06 and gave that all so famous hug to each other. Why wouldn't they? They stood to gain almost $200million between the board, and retain their positions in the private company who then had no one to answer to, and gut the company the way they wanted. Dixon is likely to come back only to finish what he started.
QF94 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 06:13
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Universe
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
Dixon is likely to come back only to finish what he started.
Like dogs to their vomit.

Disgusting, but they just can't help it.
standard unit is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 07:32
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And...we're back!
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.