Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

F100's to Emerald for Qantas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2012, 21:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As to your dismissive, condescending, smug post about my inability to find a comfortable spot on the ATR I say Virgin should be worried.

They are the people offering a commercial package against the incumbents and if Virgin look at the size of passengers embarking on the frames you will no doubt note that quite a few are a bit outside the ICAO 77KG 4 FOOT tall cookie cutter pop out that the ATR72 - 500 seems designed for.

Last Thursday I travelled the SYD - CBR route I caught the Dash 8 to SYD then caught the Coach back, whilst twice as long time wise it had more room and cost my employer 15% of a turboprop ticket.

Cant get comfortable in Business you silly Billy? two weeks ago I flew back from Indonesia in Business and the space, comfort level was incredible.

Now where's that high speed rail everyone keeps talking about?
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 01:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wherever seniority dictates
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the difference between the ATR and Q400, I don't find much comfort difference as pax. The 400 feels like a much bigger aeroplane than the ATR for some reason, which is nice. No economy class seat is going to be super comfortable for long so the speed of the Q400 helps out with that.

I think the operator sees even more benefit from the higher speed than the punters. Shaving 10-20 min off every sector compared to the ATR adds up to a lot of extra utilisation per airframe day. The APU on the Dash seems to help with quicker turn around times too.
muffman is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 01:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WA
Age: 71
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As SLF, jumped for joy when Q entered the WA market, I am a twice -fortnightly flyer Per-GET. Couldn't get off the Skywest F50 quick enough. Cut at least 15 minutes off a short sector, new aircraft, comfort levels quite acceptable, and, of course, murdered the old F50 in all aspects .Then put up with 5 months of absolutely appalling on-time performance. Initial thoughts were----new operation, give it some time to bed in. But it went on and on; I can dismiss the "Perth Airport factors" as not their fault, but, when you only have two of type in the state, both flying, and one goes down, you are in the s**t.
So I am back on Skywest, and guess what? I can do the same route, for the same price on an F100, even quicker, and more comfortably. So, curently, all my airmiles are on F100's--apart from the one airframe with rock-hard seats(can never remeber the rego) , comfortable flying with plenty of legroom. Do the Alliance F100's have the same seat pitch as Skywest's ?
ranmar850 is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 03:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10'S 100'E
Age: 47
Posts: 148
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Virgin should be cleaning up!?
Ticket prices outbound from Brisbane
$210 with bags, or you can save a whole $2, and pay $198 without checked bags on the ATR
or
$340 "flexi saver" or you could choose to pay $717 for a fully flexible fare on the dash.
I was able to find a "red e deal" on the dash of $102 but that is for Emerald to Brisbane at 3pm on Sunday the 13th May.
(for the nit pickers-prices were listed on webjet Saturday the 5th, for travel Sunday 6th/13th May)


The rumour I've heard is that Virgin isn't able/willing to send the E-jet to Emerald-somthing to do with the bump/slope of the runway?.. any one know the facts there??..

On a side note, does anyone know if Virgin are considering operations to Moranbah?? A big new terminal is due to open there June/July, currently dash 8 fares are consistent around $700 one way...

Last edited by noclue; 5th May 2012 at 03:33. Reason: additional comment
noclue is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 05:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The crew room
Posts: 54
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the 72-600s online yet? Anyone been for a fly on one? I understand that there is a significant effort to improve feel and comfort.

Interesting comment about APUs, I thought the hotel mode setup would be faster?
FlareHighLandLong is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 05:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Straya
Posts: 157
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
There's a bump/slope at Emerald?
Aimpoint is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 05:42
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The bump/slope at Hervey Bay hasn't stopped the Ejet and the 737 from operating there.
GAFA is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 07:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10'S 100'E
Age: 47
Posts: 148
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Runway 06 slopes down hill to the 24 threshold from about halfway along the runway. In fact sitting on the 06 threshold, you can't see much past the windsock-let alone the opposite ends' threshold.

I wouldn't have thought it would be a problem either, just asking as I was told it was a reason the E-jet wasn't there (yet)?
noclue is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 09:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moranbah is a closed shop, BMA own and operate it. They contractually only allow QFLINK to operate......
stgeorge2035 is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 09:34
  #30 (permalink)  
b55
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Far Side
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
noclue
Moranbah runway is apparently owned by the mining company. Yes, bigger ramp and bigger terminal but, NO talk as yet to make it open to anyone else or bigger for jets. It's making so much BIG MONEY for Qantas I could only imagine that over that business lunch at that 5 star restaurant Qantas has given enough "incentives" to keep the runway for themselves.
b55 is offline  
Old 6th May 2012, 10:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The World
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DC9, F100......it is probably time you tried something from the current millennium...
Tangan is offline  
Old 6th May 2012, 23:02
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
F100......it is probably time you tried something from the current millennium...
I suspect that they are trying to stretch the life of the F100's until the "C" series become available. The "C" series looks the most obvious aircraft to fill this role with significantly lower DOCs than current technology aircraft. The biggest "unknown" is how they will handle some of the more austere strips that the Fokkers have always excelled at.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 6th May 2012, 23:15
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arsetrailer
Posts: 287
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C series being sold at 58 to 70 million each better have very good performance. The difference in acquisition cost buys a hell of a lot of fuel.
Fred Gassit is offline  
Old 6th May 2012, 23:15
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Difference between ATR and a Dash 8? For me,as a passenger in NZ - I fly a route from Dunedin via CHC to Nelson that sees me changing from an ATR to a Dash 8 Q300. So I do see the difference. The seats feel about the same - it is the ankle room. The Dash 8 fuselage curves in at ankle level, so the person in the window seat will notice that. The ATR sidewall goes straight down. (This would be whether you are in a Q300 or Q400.)

On NZ routes, the Q300 and the ATR have the same time shown in the timetable. Some routes north of CHC to Hamilton or Tauranga, or Dunedin to Wellington would have a small advantage if Q400s were used.

Would be nice to have some Alliance Fokker 100s in NZ.
alangirvan is offline  
Old 6th May 2012, 23:19
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are going to have low utilisation planes, surely Fokker 100s are ideal. How many hours a month would you use a C series, to get your money back.

If the people in Europe who want to do a NG Fokker 100 with new engines - that might be an interesting plane. Or just stick the new engines on existing frames.
alangirvan is offline  
Old 7th May 2012, 04:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cairns Australia
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those poor Alliance pilots are going to have to double check who they are flying for before making any PAs
YES....Good morning ladies and gentlemen this is your captain speaking.
Thankyou for flying with us on this Alliance F100 jet operated for Qantas woops I mean Virgin Australia flight....He He
jarden is offline  
Old 7th May 2012, 09:55
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
C series being sold at 58 to 70 million each better have very good performance. The difference in acquisition cost buys a hell of a lot of fuel.
I totally agree, Fred, but fuel isn't the only cost . As aircraft age, each successive Heavy maintenance check gets more expensive until eventually it's cheaper to purchase new aircraft.

The Fokker is such a perfect niche aircraft that is very hard to replace with newer fuel efficient aircraft.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 7th May 2012, 10:16
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Imagine 3 F100's sitting on the tarmac in Emerald one being a FIFO charter of alliances own and the other two being RPT for virgin and qantas.

Last edited by falconx; 7th May 2012 at 20:57.
falconx is offline  
Old 7th May 2012, 23:07
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10'S 100'E
Age: 47
Posts: 148
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
You mean 2 parked on the Tarmac, the third holding on the runway waiting for a parking spot, meanwhile toll express is inbound from thangool
noclue is offline  
Old 8th May 2012, 00:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Will the F100 fit on both bays at the same time with enough room to taxi behind?
Going Nowhere is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.