New 'Aviation Minister' after Monday?
Thread Starter
New 'Aviation Minister' after Monday?
Heard on the local news this morn. (Sat) that Minister Albanese has thrown his support behind K Rudd for the Labor Caucus vote on Mon. morn.........
Could this mean a new Aviation Minister by Mon. Arvo..??
Will there be any changes..??
Could this mean a new Aviation Minister by Mon. Arvo..??
Will there be any changes..??
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bradd
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We can only hope
If Julia wins, he's on the back benches by Tues morning. If Kevvie wins he'll be after a promotion. Shortly after he gets his promotion Tony Windsor will tell them all bets are off and we'll go to the polls. Win, win and win I think
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking a little further down the track, I think it is a lose - lose situation.
Labour have a poor record and won't win the next election, the Libs will take industrial relations back to the 1920s!
Labour have a poor record and won't win the next election, the Libs will take industrial relations back to the 1920s!
.
Oh, i dunno. Under the Lib's at least we will still have an industry to have 'relations' with. Under Labore and their carbon trading scam we wont have any industrial relations to worry about at all...
.
...the Libs will take industrial relations back to the 1920s!
Oh, i dunno. Under the Lib's at least we will still have an industry to have 'relations' with. Under Labore and their carbon trading scam we wont have any industrial relations to worry about at all...
.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And was'nt it the 'Libs' that sold off all our major airports?
I look forward to what the mad monk will do with aviation after he gets his orders from howard.
With Labour it seems GA gets a thousands cuts by neglect, with the Libs it seems GA gets a thousand cuts to help out their mates in big business.
I look forward to what the mad monk will do with aviation after he gets his orders from howard.
With Labour it seems GA gets a thousands cuts by neglect, with the Libs it seems GA gets a thousand cuts to help out their mates in big business.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bradd
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can you polish a turd twice?
You sure can. And at the end you have a shiny turd. Anyone who wants this self serving, delusional **** back in the top job has a very short memory.
When I said win - win earlier I was referring to the fact that whatever the outcome we are a 99% chance of getting another Transport Minister. And that's a win because this bloke is very, very ordinary.
When I said win - win earlier I was referring to the fact that whatever the outcome we are a 99% chance of getting another Transport Minister. And that's a win because this bloke is very, very ordinary.
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Looking for the deputy leadership, and/or the treasury I reckon. The Prime Minister has already said that there will be no repurcussions for Minister Albanese and for once she actually looked like she wasn't lying.
And was'nt it the 'Libs' that sold off all our major airports?
I don't think so.
EDIT to ADD: Decision made by government in April 1994. Announced decision to "sell" FAC controlled Brisbane, Melbourne and Perth in April 1995.EOI called October 1996.
Sydney Airport sale announced on 29 March 2001.
Howard 11 March 1996 to 2 Dec 2007.
Last edited by Icarus2001; 25th Feb 2012 at 05:14.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bradd
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Code:
I don't think so.
Fieldmouse,
Airport privatization was a Labor initiative, the Lib/NAT government agreed, and followed through.
Neither colour of Government has enforced the intent of the Airport Act 1996, and associated legislation, but have let developers loose --- disastrously.
As a matter of interest, the FAC airports (with the exception of Camden) were all profitable, before they were loaded up with debt by new owners.
Tootle pip!!
Airport privatization was a Labor initiative, the Lib/NAT government agreed, and followed through.
Neither colour of Government has enforced the intent of the Airport Act 1996, and associated legislation, but have let developers loose --- disastrously.
As a matter of interest, the FAC airports (with the exception of Camden) were all profitable, before they were loaded up with debt by new owners.
Tootle pip!!
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bradd
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leadsled
Little Johnny had ample time to rescind the privatization.
I remember the argument at the time that the Labour created FAC airports were returning a dividend and there was no need for a sell off.
Icarus' original post inferred that Labour sold the airports off. They didn't.
Johnny saw the dollars on offer and sat pat. Dirty hands all round.
I remember the argument at the time that the Labour created FAC airports were returning a dividend and there was no need for a sell off.
Icarus' original post inferred that Labour sold the airports off. They didn't.
Johnny saw the dollars on offer and sat pat. Dirty hands all round.
Fieldmouse, you are conveniently forgetting to mention the massive debt that the Howard government inherited from Hawke/Keating. The excessive price that the airports were sold for paid off a significant amount of that debt and assisted in Australia subsequently becoming "debt free" - until Kevin 07 got his hands on the keys to the vault.
Personally, I wish the airports hadn't been sold as they were administered better (with a lower cost to the travelling public) by the FAC.
Personally, I wish the airports hadn't been sold as they were administered better (with a lower cost to the travelling public) by the FAC.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bradd
Age: 61
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G Boeing
Hey, you are absolutely correct, but I don't have a political bias at all.
The saddest thing about the sell off was that a hell of a lot of expertise in the aviation industry took the redundancy packages and went fishing. That left a huge hole in the knowledge base for airports and aviation management in this country.
I do know that this Albanese declaration is an opportunity for us to get rid of a minister for transport who is more motivated by his re election chances in his little electorate under the flight paths, than in doing anything to fix the problems with aviation in the Sydney basin.
That is my only interest in the issue. Cheers
The saddest thing about the sell off was that a hell of a lot of expertise in the aviation industry took the redundancy packages and went fishing. That left a huge hole in the knowledge base for airports and aviation management in this country.
I do know that this Albanese declaration is an opportunity for us to get rid of a minister for transport who is more motivated by his re election chances in his little electorate under the flight paths, than in doing anything to fix the problems with aviation in the Sydney basin.
That is my only interest in the issue. Cheers
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They can install Mickey Mouse does not matter they are finished. The only good to come out of it is entertainment between the cricket and the start of the footy season. Somebody should declare open season on the Independents, what a useless, conniving, self serving bunch.
short flights long nights
Could not agree more TG. My money is on an election within 3 weeks from Monday.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My prediction is that Kevin will defeat Jules by a slim margin.
A change in leader will see the customary spike in party popularity and during this "honeymoon period" the "new" "restyled" government will call a snap election and be reinstated by the slimmest margin.
Meaning another three years of Kevin Rudd.
Maybe "old mate Albo" can play treasurer this time.
A change in leader will see the customary spike in party popularity and during this "honeymoon period" the "new" "restyled" government will call a snap election and be reinstated by the slimmest margin.
Meaning another three years of Kevin Rudd.
Maybe "old mate Albo" can play treasurer this time.
What a testament to the Laissez faire attitude of the average Australian.
Less stable/more engaged countries would have rioting in the streets/Civil war.
Seemingly most Australians don't care who runs the country, just as long as our lives stroll along with minimal change it matters not who steers the ship.
I'm not for a minute suggesting this is a bad thing.
It does make you wonder , that whilst all of this infighting is taking place....... who is governing the country.....................??
Strange days indeed.
Less stable/more engaged countries would have rioting in the streets/Civil war.
Seemingly most Australians don't care who runs the country, just as long as our lives stroll along with minimal change it matters not who steers the ship.
I'm not for a minute suggesting this is a bad thing.
It does make you wonder , that whilst all of this infighting is taking place....... who is governing the country.....................??
Strange days indeed.
Pair of muppets...(literally)!
The smug know-it-all (Dr Honeydew) vs. The nervous ranga (Beaker)
Would love to see the hypocritical south end of a north-bound orangutan (JooLIAR) get booted by the party and see them lose anyway, but then again, would also love to see the ship go down with her at the helm (in the interests of accountability).
Fcuking hilarious!
Didn't and still wouldn't vote for either of them...don't blame me.
The smug know-it-all (Dr Honeydew) vs. The nervous ranga (Beaker)
Would love to see the hypocritical south end of a north-bound orangutan (JooLIAR) get booted by the party and see them lose anyway, but then again, would also love to see the ship go down with her at the helm (in the interests of accountability).
Fcuking hilarious!
Didn't and still wouldn't vote for either of them...don't blame me.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: lapbandland
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wake up australia.The real problem is the GREENS, they created this
minority non-sense and will probably end up controlling whoever
governs in the future. Labor never wanted a carbon tax, on shore processing
or half the other crap.Tt was all inflicted by Bob bloody Brown.
The truly disgusting thing is Bob Brown would have destroyed our
industries had he sided with a Liberal minority government as well.
The danger to us all is GREENS controlling our government.
Bob brown is quietly sitting under the radar, he will gain more power
at the next election by stealth, neither party will have the guts
to roll back anything he has inflicted.
It's about power at any cost, the GREENS are the problem,
not the major parties, Labor know the carbon tax is unpopular but
Bob rules.
. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
minority non-sense and will probably end up controlling whoever
governs in the future. Labor never wanted a carbon tax, on shore processing
or half the other crap.Tt was all inflicted by Bob bloody Brown.
The truly disgusting thing is Bob Brown would have destroyed our
industries had he sided with a Liberal minority government as well.
The danger to us all is GREENS controlling our government.
Bob brown is quietly sitting under the radar, he will gain more power
at the next election by stealth, neither party will have the guts
to roll back anything he has inflicted.
It's about power at any cost, the GREENS are the problem,
not the major parties, Labor know the carbon tax is unpopular but
Bob rules.
. WAKE UP PEOPLE!