Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin Australia's plans for 2012

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Australia's plans for 2012

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2012, 08:06
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: nz
Posts: 25
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Casa Atpl still required..
zkcub is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2012, 22:19
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long do we think it will be before Virgin Australia becomes the flag ship carrier for the nation (Atleast Domestically)
syd16R is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2012, 22:31
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Universe
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
How long do we think it will be before Virgin Australia becomes the flag ship carrier for the nation (Atleast Domestically)
Inside of five years if Qantas "management" get their way.
standard unit is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 01:28
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,274
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Virgin Australia has announced plans to restructure its business to attract more foreign investment.

Australia's second largest airline will create a separate unlisted international holdings company, Virgin Australia International Holdings, that will hold the company's international airlines and allow it to attract more offshore capital.

So DJ is Australian !!!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 03:34
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More Australian than Qantas.
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 06:25
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,140
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Looks like Qantas is on their case

Meanwhile Qantas today effectively objected to Virgin Australia's restructuring ambitions by calling on the International Air Services Commission to conduct an inquiry into its plans, Crikey reports. The objection could ruin plans for Virgin Australia to gain more foreign investment capital from carriers such as Etihad.

Read more: Qantas A380 oil leaks blamed on manufacturer 'oversight' | News.com.au
Methinks they would be better off attending to their own back yard ... before attempting to spoil the neighbor's BBQ ! !
peuce is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 06:44
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: goulburn
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They have shown NO capacity to look after their own backyard, in fact don't they want to burn it to the ground?

You know they are getting desperate when they whinge to the referee because there was one time when they were so strong it didn't matter but now...... they are getting what they deserve with the way they treat staff, customers and the investing public.
ohallen is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 11:12
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 255
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is slightly off topic. But is it true that Virgin Australia operates a 777 from Abu Dhabi to Kuala Lumpur daily on behalf of Etihad?
pull-up-terrain is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 12:16
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the rate Virgin are procuring aircraft, they'll never match Qantas domestically.

Just compare the fleet sizes and order books...

Seriously guys...
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 13:05
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T VASI I believe Virgin were trying not to be the biggest airline in Oz but the airline of choice in Australia. But with some foreign capital it could easily be both!
Seriously is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 20:17
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope you're not including the 110 odd A320's in your 'order book', T Vasis......
porch monkey is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 22:38
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 110 A320s never were in addition to the status quo. Jetstar is a LCC and recycles their fleet before the costs of maintaining it catch up with them.

The A320s are replacements with a marginal capacity growth.

I don't think there ever was a redq.

Divide, confuse and conquer.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2012, 23:36
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turn up your sarcasm detector a smidgen GG
porch monkey is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2012, 09:39
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 255
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i also heard a rumour that Virgin Australia is planning to fly to Singapore and Taiwan by the end of this year.
pull-up-terrain is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2012, 10:38
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cairns Australia
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That will be a code share flight operated by SIA aircraft not VA metal.
jarden is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2012, 23:56
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 41,000'
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems the restructure has got the go-ahead. Shares up in early trading...

Virgin restructure to go ahead | News.com.au
piston broke again is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 02:41
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
peuce said
Looks like Qantas is on their case
Looks like QF have no case


Qantas fails in bid to clip Virgin's wings



Matt O’Sullivan


March 21, 2012 - 12:49PM



The federal government has rebuffed Qantas’s demands for a ‘‘comprehensive public review’’ of Virgin Australia’s sweeping plans to lift the shackles off a foreign ownership cap on its domestic operations.



Qantas last week called on federal aviation authorities to scrutinise Virgin’s corporate split because it believed its rival’s international operations might end up running foul of the Air Navigation Act, which requires foreign ownership to be capped at 49 per cent.



But in a submission released today, the Department of Infrastructure and Transport has bluntly rejected Qantas’s demands and made clear it believes Virgin’s plans comply with the rules needed for it to retain rights to fly overseas routes as a designated Australian airline.



‘‘We do not believe Qantas’s suggestion of the need for a public inquiry is either necessary or appropriate in the context of this application [by Virgin],’’ the department said.






Pehaps the Qantas’s general counsel, is not as smart as the Virgin general counsel



73to91 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 04:10
  #58 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So when can we expect Etihad to inject a bunch of cash to stem the emirates tidel wave?
bangbounceboeing is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 05:09
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 255
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So when can we expect Etihad to inject a bunch of cash to stem the emirates tidel wave?
A few more 777's flying to some new destinations would be nice.
pull-up-terrain is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2012, 06:24
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Downunder
Age: 74
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pull-up-terrain
A few more 777's flying to some new destinations would be nice.
With red tails and white roos on them ?

ST
SpannerTwister is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.