Full body scanners approved
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaia
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full body scanners approved
Now this should promote some discussion!! 
FULL-BODY scanners will be introduced at Australia's eight major gateway airports after receiving the green light from the federal government.
The decision comes after trials of the scanners in Melbourne and Sydney and has a target date of July 1.
From todays Australian
FULL-BODY scanners will be introduced at Australia's eight major gateway airports after receiving the green light from the federal government.
The decision comes after trials of the scanners in Melbourne and Sydney and has a target date of July 1.
From todays Australian
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This discussion has been up before, but don't forget the proposed scanners for Australia are the millimetre-wave scanners, not the backscatter xray scanners used in some other countries. There's a significant difference in the technology from a health perspective. Millimetre waves do not initiate cancer, for example (unlike xrays).
But privacy concerns are serious. These devices can present a reasonably clear image through clothing. Software is available which converts this to a generic human outline, but this software isn't widely used and abuses at the TSA have already demonstrated that privacy concerns are quite valid.
Even worse still, and bound to be completely ignored by the Government, is the fact that their effectiveness is under a cloud. Earlier this year, an undercover TSA agent was repeatedly able to get past these scanners carrying a concealed handgun in covert testing at Dallas-Fort Worth! The TSA and Governments maintain that these scanners are effective, even though not a solitary terrorist has ever been detected by one. So what they base their data on is somewhat of a mystery to us all.
But privacy concerns are serious. These devices can present a reasonably clear image through clothing. Software is available which converts this to a generic human outline, but this software isn't widely used and abuses at the TSA have already demonstrated that privacy concerns are quite valid.
Even worse still, and bound to be completely ignored by the Government, is the fact that their effectiveness is under a cloud. Earlier this year, an undercover TSA agent was repeatedly able to get past these scanners carrying a concealed handgun in covert testing at Dallas-Fort Worth! The TSA and Governments maintain that these scanners are effective, even though not a solitary terrorist has ever been detected by one. So what they base their data on is somewhat of a mystery to us all.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Coast
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dutch, the basis is the controlled testing done in a laboratory environment. The difficulty with any data based on how many terrorists you catch is you do not know how many have tried to get through. My experience is that no single technology has proven to be the panacea. Millimetric wave is good and far better than metal detection.
There are systems that do not show an image at all unless the system detects 'foreign objects' and many countries have protections in place against abuses. The interesting thing is what if a passenger refuses? does this make them a suspect?
In the UK there is no power of forced search for airport security so a passenger can refused to be searched. However, it is a condition of entry so the airport will stop you flying but will that refusal make you a target of police suspicion?
I understand that feedback from trials carried out at airports was generally well received and no big issues from the frequent fliers but i suspect questions will keep cropping up on this one. i would be interested to know how it has been received publicly in Australia
There are systems that do not show an image at all unless the system detects 'foreign objects' and many countries have protections in place against abuses. The interesting thing is what if a passenger refuses? does this make them a suspect?
In the UK there is no power of forced search for airport security so a passenger can refused to be searched. However, it is a condition of entry so the airport will stop you flying but will that refusal make you a target of police suspicion?
I understand that feedback from trials carried out at airports was generally well received and no big issues from the frequent fliers but i suspect questions will keep cropping up on this one. i would be interested to know how it has been received publicly in Australia
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
What a cracker!!!! I loved this bit 
TSA employees fry their own genitals with radiation
Now, even though the NIST did not test the safety of these machines, it did warn airport screeners to avoid standing next to them because the machines clearly emitted doses of radiation that could mutate DNA and cause cancer.
The bulk of TSA employees, who we've already established are among the most intellectually-challenged individuals which are still somehow employable, don't seem to care that they're getting fried with radiation every day on the job. In fact, many TSA employees don't even understand the laws of physics, as has been demonstrated over and over when they tell travelers truly idiotic things like, "There's no radiation from these machines." (True story. This is what one of our contributing writers was told by a TSA agent in Denver.)
Gee, how do they think the machines work? Do they think they're magic? Who needs radiation when you can just use magic to see through people!
The one notable upshot from all this is the realization that TSA agents might experience so much DNA damage from standing next to those machines that they will be rendered completely infertile and therefore have no ability to reproduce. This, the scientists say, is called "natural selection." Those best adapted to surviving will pass on their genes to the next generation, while those who fail to protect the integrity of their own DNA get removed from the human gene pool. I can't think of a more appropriate example of natural selection in action. Darwin eats TSA agents as a mid-morning snack, it seems. So maybe those radiation machines do have a purpose after all...
Now, even though the NIST did not test the safety of these machines, it did warn airport screeners to avoid standing next to them because the machines clearly emitted doses of radiation that could mutate DNA and cause cancer.
The bulk of TSA employees, who we've already established are among the most intellectually-challenged individuals which are still somehow employable, don't seem to care that they're getting fried with radiation every day on the job. In fact, many TSA employees don't even understand the laws of physics, as has been demonstrated over and over when they tell travelers truly idiotic things like, "There's no radiation from these machines." (True story. This is what one of our contributing writers was told by a TSA agent in Denver.)
Gee, how do they think the machines work? Do they think they're magic? Who needs radiation when you can just use magic to see through people!
The one notable upshot from all this is the realization that TSA agents might experience so much DNA damage from standing next to those machines that they will be rendered completely infertile and therefore have no ability to reproduce. This, the scientists say, is called "natural selection." Those best adapted to surviving will pass on their genes to the next generation, while those who fail to protect the integrity of their own DNA get removed from the human gene pool. I can't think of a more appropriate example of natural selection in action. Darwin eats TSA agents as a mid-morning snack, it seems. So maybe those radiation machines do have a purpose after all...
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Coast
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excellent Jaberwocky
I also enjoyed some of the claims in the ads on that site, becoming a muscle bound hunk is easy with a few drops of potion and some herb tablets!!!
seriously, I am surprised that you do not see the screeners wearing those radiation badges that xray operators where in hospitals!!
I also enjoyed some of the claims in the ads on that site, becoming a muscle bound hunk is easy with a few drops of potion and some herb tablets!!!
seriously, I am surprised that you do not see the screeners wearing those radiation badges that xray operators where in hospitals!!
My only experience with a body scanner was in Melbourne 4 weeks ago. Stood in line to be scanned for 30 min only to have the thing crash shortly before I got to it. Based on the reaction from the staff, software crashes are common.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cue the predictable wailing and hand-wringing from the civil liberties galahs.
How about we ditch the expensive and questinably effective machines and go for good old racial profiling instead?
No, wait - that would be telling it like it is.
How about we ditch the expensive and questinably effective machines and go for good old racial profiling instead?
No, wait - that would be telling it like it is.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Otautahi (awright, NZCH)
Age: 74
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...and all the while those who would attempt to harm us (not fond of the word "terrorist" - too narrow a meaning) are rolling around, laughing.
"Them" - 1; Us - 0 (and it was an "own" goal)
Next please...
Le Vieux
"Them" - 1; Us - 0 (and it was an "own" goal)
Next please...
Le Vieux
"Old'un" that's exactly how I think, they (the 'tourists') the ones that we are being protected from are chalking up anther win whilst we run around like chooks with our heads cut off!!!!
It's called intimidation, they have perfected the art of that theses days & they don't have to lift a finger to achieve it!
Like all forms of security if someone wants to really get in so to speak then they will find a way.
I shake my head every time I go thru a scanner when on the way to the cockpit
Locks...........they are for the honest thieves out there!
Wmk2
It's called intimidation, they have perfected the art of that theses days & they don't have to lift a finger to achieve it!Like all forms of security if someone wants to really get in so to speak then they will find a way.
I shake my head every time I go thru a scanner when on the way to the cockpit
Locks...........they are for the honest thieves out there!
Wmk2
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: a nica place
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Scanners were one big corrupt deal from the Ex-head of homeland security M.Chertoff. Who suddenly found himself ordering hundreds of scanners for the U.S.A, and suddenly now the CEO of that same scanner company!......... Uh-Hem.....dare no one scream corruption and terrorist fear mongering or be labelled a "conspiracy guy"..... load of ****, if only people were less apathetic and demand their personal freedoms instead of letting them be taken away under fear!
Europe Bans X-Ray Body Scanners Used at U.S. Airports
Call the AFAP or any union representing you stating you refuse to go through these machines. Also write/email/talk to your MP and state the same.
time to stop this farce....... next thing you know we will have a carbon tax....opps!
Europe Bans X-Ray Body Scanners Used at U.S. Airports
Call the AFAP or any union representing you stating you refuse to go through these machines. Also write/email/talk to your MP and state the same.
time to stop this farce....... next thing you know we will have a carbon tax....opps!
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brisbane
Age: 60
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CFICARE now there's a thought put Juliar in a full body scanner and post the pics on the 6 oclock news and that'll get the scanners banned for sure!!!!!!!!!
Bright
Bright
FAA Scan Ban
X-ray scanners to be pulled from US airports
January 19, 2013 - 12:01PM
America's Transportation Security Administration says controversial X-ray security scanners that caused an uproar for showing revealing images of passengers are going to be retired from all US airports.
The decision came after manufacturer Rapiscan failed to develop less invasive imaging software on time.
It will remove all 174 full-body scanners from airports by the end of May.
The scanners aimed to screen passengers for concealed weapons and other prohibited items but created a stir for showing the contour of the body with too much detail.
AAP
X-ray scanners to be pulled from US airports
January 19, 2013 - 12:01PM
America's Transportation Security Administration says controversial X-ray security scanners that caused an uproar for showing revealing images of passengers are going to be retired from all US airports.
The decision came after manufacturer Rapiscan failed to develop less invasive imaging software on time.
It will remove all 174 full-body scanners from airports by the end of May.
The scanners aimed to screen passengers for concealed weapons and other prohibited items but created a stir for showing the contour of the body with too much detail.
AAP
X-ray scanners to be pulled from US airports
Last edited by Roller Merlin; 19th Jan 2013 at 05:45.
It will be interesting to see if they do away with the body scanning capacity completely or just change over to the machines that Australia is using that only project a stick image.
Millimetre waves do not initiate cancer, for example
that this is the case. And I dont want if or buts, I want you to put your life on the line about this.