Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

An opportunity not to be missed!

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

An opportunity not to be missed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Feb 2011, 03:41
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 73
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes: Keep your eyes on the ball

DON'T CONFUSE INDUSTRIAL ISSUES WITH SAFETY. IT MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE A FOOL.
As a former Journo, I do have some experience in these matters. A golden opportunity was missed in the Senate Enquiry. At the first mention of wages, the committee, and the public, stopped reading.

"Minimum rest breaks" is a safety issue. "Pilots whose wages are so low they can't afford to live properly" is an industrial issue. Of course it may lead to a safety issue, but that's a level of indirect relationship that simply does not survive in the public's mind.

The politicians get ruthless coaching in "Staying on message". The public thinks all pilots are heroes and they would love to support you: but you guys must learn to stay on message! Study Tony Abbot and Julia Gillard. You don't have to vote for them, but learn the technique :-)

If you have a safety issue, don't talk about wages or conditions. That's what the wharfies did, and that did not end well.

Cheers
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 04:03
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
I dunno John, you're probably right and maybe I'm not as cynical as I thought. One thing's for certain though, the families of the victims of the Colgan crash (many well heeled) were absolutely flabagasted when made aware of the T&C's of the pilots who were entrusted with their loved ones lives on that dark snowy night.

It may not be on message, or fashionable to mention pilots being exploited, but it'll sure as hell feature right in the public's face if we see a similar accident here!
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 05:33
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 73
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You may not be cynical, but I am :-)

I dunno John, you're probably right and maybe I'm not as cynical as I thought. One thing's for certain though, the families of the victims of the Colgan crash (many well heeled) were absolutely flabagasted when made aware of the T&C's of the pilots who were entrusted with their loved ones lives on that dark snowy night.
Well, as a former journo, few would be more cynical than I.

Let me clarify: I am not suggesting not talking about Industrial Issues: I am simply suggesting that you will achieve your desired results much more reliably if you do not join them with other issues.

Among the many reasons for the Colgan crash it is reported that these pilots were too tired to fly. That's a safety issue.

Obviously, the did not have the power to call in and say "Sorry, I haven't had enough sleep, I am not fit to fly." That's a safety issue.

And their boss knew, or should have known, that they were under-trained. That's a safety issue.

There are ALSO Industrial issues. I am sure Colgan has some. I am sure every airline has some.

Industrial issues deserve and require plenty of media space. As much as you can get That's the job of your union. When I was in a union, I was very vigorous in demanding that it represented my interests with any resources at its disposal.

My point is simply that when you mix "Safety Issues" and "Industrial Issues" in the same story, you lose your public, you lose your regulators, and you lose your battle.

Of course you should raise Industrial Issues. That's what unions are for. And of course you should raise safety issues: you are the only ones who can.

But never, ever, risk presenting an Industrial Issue as, or intermingled with, a safety issue. Because the moment you do that, you lose your credibility. Your "brand image", of you like. And that's your only weapon, so try NOT to misplace it!
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 05:51
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saftey Issues (not industrial)

JQ must be one of the only airlines in the world where captains are asked to consitantly fly 1000hrs a year, and to supervise inexperienced cadet FO's while doing four sector days into CTAF's with 30m wide runways.

Something is going to give...
Long John Silver is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 06:38
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
I do see where you're coming from John.

It'll be interesting however if (God forbid) one goes in, and the Families exclaim, "They were paid what!" But as always the self interested Psychopaths running the show will continue to hide behind a self promoted air of respectability in their quest to save the travelling public from those greedy pilots.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 08:03
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts
What 30m Rwys do JQ operate into?
Capt_SNAFU is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 08:06
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,871
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Krusty, I'm sure that they'd use the term "World's best practice" in their defence.
Going Boeing is online now  
Old 24th Feb 2011, 08:20
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Ballina, Sunshine Coast
Going Nowhere is online now  
Old 27th Feb 2011, 10:16
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does 2.5% become 26%?

The politicians get ruthless coaching in "Staying on message". The public thinks all pilots are heroes and they would love to support you: but you guys must learn to stay on message!
I agree, after the recent events at QF the pilots have come over as the very people who saved the airlines brand damage, AJ got a free ride, it could have been worse.

I believe this video pretty much sums up the spin at Qantas, when it suits the management the pilots are fantastic, the hypocrisy of it all, it makes no sense to stretch the truth as AJ did on national TV.

If the pilots stay on a simple message the public/punters will see through it all, a bit like the Sol Trujillo days at Telstra, take the money and run. This style of airline management is beginning to tire, and I feel AJ shot himself in the foot with his answers to the last two questions, he answered poorly.


Last edited by TIMA9X; 27th Feb 2011 at 21:09.
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 04:10
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Krusty, I'm sure that they'd use the term "World's best practice" in their defence.

Krusty, I'm sure that they'd use the term "World's best practice" in their defence.
Is this the ultimate AJ cost efficient pilot training scheme?
Video - Chocks away! Learn to fly a 737 in 30 mins - The Sydney Morning Herald

Efficient | Define Efficient at Dictionary.com
satisfactory and economical to use: Our new air conditioner is more efficient than our old one.
or
utilizing a particular commodity or product with maximum efficiency (usually used in combination): a fuel-efficient engine.
other words, bonus driven value for money training.....
Chocks away! Learn to fly a 737 in 30 mins (04:04)
With the happening of late from the Q group management, makes you begin to wonder.....
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 06:40
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Things have certainly become more efficient, I distinctly remember bob saying that it took 7 hours to learn to fly.
fl610 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2011, 03:01
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The public thinks all pilots are heroes and they would love to support you
Gimme a break - that would have to be the silliest statement I've ever read on DG. No they don't!

a) The Oz public doesn't give a **** about pilots. It has its own problems to deal with, like trying to keep its financial head above water.

b) The "cutting down of tall poppies" cultural syndrome is alive and well. The hope was Gen Y would bury this defect but that hasn't happened. At the end of the day pilots are still perceived as overpaid glorified bus drivers as it ever was, despite the reality of the opposite. Forget those unreliable idiotic tabloid polls and get out more - mix with the Unwashed and get the true picture.

There are other reasons but why waste time stating the obvious?

If Mr McGhie really is 60yo then he of all people should be familiar with Australian industrial history and public manipulation.
Slasher is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2011, 19:14
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Za farzer land
Age: 53
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a yarn to a jetstar Capt in MEL finishing his Singapore return the other day, he was working with another capt. When I asked if he was on a check, he replied jetstar were short of FO's primarily because no one is being upgraded to FO on the Aus EBA. This is why they asking for FO's based in NZ on 65k so they can avoid the Aus EBA just like they are currently doing with every new recruit on the 320. What are you guys at Jetstar doing about this? How the hell are you letting these guys break the law and have all new hires be put on the NZ contract to be "domiciled" in Australia? Surely you have a big case if not one person has been hired on the Aussie EBA for I don't know how long!!?? Doesn't this make a mokery of a collective agreement signed in good faith by the company and it's employees? Pitch in and hire an employment lawyer for Christ sake!

The 330 capt also mentioned that Jetstar were about to get a rude awakening with captains leaving to work for air china based in SYD. But I guess Jetstar will just hire new captains on a NZ 320 capt salary to replace them.

Grow some nuts boys and girls in Jetstar. It seems the only nuts are in management and they're having a right ol time.
Fruet Mich is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 00:47
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
FO's based in NZ on 65k
65k AUD or NZD ?
John Citizen is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 01:00
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pitch in and hire an employment lawyer for Christ sake!
I would have hoped that avenue was being pursued by AIPA given that two-thirds of the pilot body are now represented.

Where is AIPA on this?
Popgun is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2011, 04:51
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TIBA
Posts: 461
Received 129 Likes on 37 Posts
Where is AIPA on this?
AIPA is tackling this issue via the Jetconnect FWA case.

If you were a member of AIPA you would be aware of this.
CaptCloudbuster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.