Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A380 - VH-OQA Write Off.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2010, 01:37
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure it's got nothing to do with their OHS obligations. Self insured, what rubbish!
Your wrong. I should know, I helped introduce the program....Sorry to dissapoint you all.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2010, 04:27
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a lot of people understand that the premiums involved in many types of insurance are mind-boggling. Many large companies self-insure where they calculate the premium is out of proportion to the risk involved.

As an example (but not specifically aviation-related), a friend owned a large hardware/clothing/mixed goods store in the country. Every once in a while, a gang would come through the small town, and indulge in break-in and theft.
After one such event, when he was cleaning up, I was talking to him and said... "Well, I guess your insurance will cover this, but it will put your premiums up?"

His answer? "I don't carry insurance on the stock. It's not worth it. The insurance company want too much, in relation to the value of the stock, for an annual premium.
I have $200,000 worth of stock here. I get broken into once every 2 or 3 years, and lose maybe $2000-3000 worth of goods. That amount is vastly less than the total of the premiums for the same period. It's a no-brainer".
onetrack is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2010, 04:59
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Until a fire runs through the place and burns every single item! Then that insurance just paid for itself ten fold!
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2010, 07:36
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How often will he have a total loss of all his stock by fire ? If the insurance premiums over a ten year period would pay for the stock and he has a total loss after eleven years then he's ahead, assuming he has invested the money he would have paid the insurer. Note if he's squandered the money instead he can kiss his business goodbye.

I prefer to insure against catastrophic losses and wear the occasional minor one. Eg with travel insurance I will be covered if I am run over by a car and need emergency evacuation totaling thousands. If I cut my hand and have a doctors bill for a couple of hundred dollars I'll pay it myself. Making small claims just isn't worth it as your premium will only go up the following year.
Metro man is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2010, 08:44
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The gent in question had comprehensive insurance against fire... he just didn't have insurance against theft. Lots of people just carry basic 3rd-party insurance on older vehicles, rather than comprehensive insurance, when they calculate their risk of total loss is low.
When a vehicle insurance premium is $700 annually for comprehensive insurance and $200 annually for 3rd party, you are going to be well in front after a few years, with a low value vehicle, that you deem to be at low risk.

I came across an old farmer in the early 1980's, who had had his entire wheat crop devastated by a hailstorm, just as it was ready to harvest. He'd lost about $200,000 worth of crop (in 1980 values).
When I discussed with him, how he'd go with insurance, he just stated blandly... "It wasn't insured, and I haven't insured a crop since 1934! I'm well in front! - rather than giving vast sums of money to rogue insurance companies, that always make more money than I do!!"
onetrack is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2010, 09:29
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I came across an old farmer in the early 1980's, who had had his entire wheat crop devastated by a hailstorm, just as it was ready to harvest. He'd lost about $200,000 worth of crop (in 1980 values).
Was it a 'Nimbin' farmer ???
However, perhaps the story goes more like this -
Maybe it was a little Irish farmer who used to use the term 'crop' in an endearing manner to refer to his crop of underlings and managers who have been harvesting great rewards while bleeding the farm dry and providing sub-standard produce as a result. Eventually the Irish farmer would stand down some of his tractor mechanics who reported faulty equipment to the farmer for safety reasons. Even the new state of the art tractors had serviceability issues. Nonetheless, the Irish farmer arrogantly removed the mechanics which further eroded the farms reputation for providing a safe consumable product which was now becoming even more shunned by the consumer.
The CSIRO's position on the matter is yet to be played out fully and the end of the story is yet to be written....
Back to my Jack Daniels.
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2010, 09:42
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's quite a clever farming/aviation parallel scenario you've drawn up there, Cactusjack. Have you been eavesdropping on certain management meetings? Are you in the employ of one Julian Assange, by any chance?
Let me ask this one last important question. Do you value your job in the aviation industry? You might want to rewrite that scenario, if you do.
onetrack is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2010, 09:57
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's quite a clever farming/aviation parallel scenario you've drawn up there, Cactusjack. Have you been eavesdropping on certain management meetings? Are you in the employ of one Julian Assange, by any chance?
Negative on the eavesdropping. The walls at Mascot are too thick, but I did hear some noises one night that sounded like a cross bewteen an overloaded washing machine and a piglet squeeling, cause undertermined ! Besides they wont let us toilet cleaners in the building until after the top dogs have gone home for the day.
As for poor Jules, that too is a negative and I don't work for that mischievous funster. However you never know if he may have a secret stash of 'intel' obtained from the Mascot archives, time will tell. I do like his taste in Swedes however...
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 01:47
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actually they are self insured in the above areas.
Still wrong!

They self-insure Workers Compensation only.

Just the stamp duty alone on the aviation risk premium was around $5.14 million four or so years ago.
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2011, 10:06
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any update on fate of this A380?
Repair in situ, or repair in France, or what?
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2011, 18:19
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heard about a week ago from a source over there,that Airbus are struggling to come up with repair schemes,17 holes alone in the fuel tanks.$20 k a day alone just to park up the aircraft in the singapore hangar.Looking very close to a write off.looks like i was wrong.
qf 1 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2011, 20:12
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: deutschland
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If this goes on too much longer, I would imagine the insurer will start looking at a commercial write off, if only to limit their liability.

Now, how to get it out of WSSS ?????
Con Catenator is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2011, 23:03
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: I like cheeseburgers
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Push it in the bay - create an artificial reef....

OR

Use it as a static display for the RFFF to us as a training aid...
Scamp Damp is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 12:10
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: sydney
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas does not self-insure its aircraft hulls. For a start it doesn't own all of them. Many are leased and I can assure you that lessors require 'real' insurance.
Lessors even require a right of approval of the insurer - no dodgy insurers allowed. Lease language sometimes allows lessee (airline) a choice, but from only a subset of insurers, and to the satisfaction of lessor.

Self-insurance might be possible for wholly-owned aircraft, but if there is any financing of them I'm sure the financiers would not allow it.
Groaner is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 20:37
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Marion, South Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the name and tail symbol been painted over yet?

Mike
mmciau is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2011, 21:52
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne
Age: 57
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kangaroo Court
Believe it or not..it's probably going to be the best one they own after they're finished with it; can you imagine them doing anything less than a perfect job with the whole world watching?

I wonder if the whole left wing will have to be replaced?
Now there's a job for Mark Arbib!!

Romulus is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2011, 00:29
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
Haha, that's gold Romulus!
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2011, 01:45
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas does not self-insure its aircraft hulls.
Qantas has only ever self-insured the first $100k of damage to anything, after that everything else is "fully insured". If they self-insured the whole lot OJH would not be flying today.

(OJH is the one they "parked" on the golf course in Bangkok)
Millet Fanger is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2011, 02:29
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Millet Fanger is correct. One insurer for $100K to $1 Million (in the case of the A380) and a group of insurers for amounts above that. First $100K is the Qantas excess.

A lot of misinformation on this thread.

MF, I think I went to Tech with you back in the early eighties. A little known aircraft called a "Millet Fangar" that would be periodically discussed?
walschaert valve is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2011, 08:39
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looking for the bridge of trust
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote from Romulus
"Now there's a job for Mark Arbib!!"

Obviously not a job for John Holland.

Well hello Romulus, long time no hear.

Please, pray tell us how would John Holland go about organising the repair job on the big bird had they been successful in getting the 380 maintenance gig.

I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.
The Bungeyed Bandit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.