Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: Senate Inquiry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2011, 02:42
  #761 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silly me,
I always thought that what happened after management incompetence in JetStar was caught out, the responsible incompetent was parachuted into a nice cushy job in Qantas.
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 02:47
  #762 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any truth to the rumour that a certain HR manager at Jetstar has been fired over the botched cadet scheme
Yes, and quite right too!!!

Remember, if the boss gets a beating - Sh1t falls down the way!!!!

What happenned to KA, the exec HR manager in Jetstar??

More to Follow

The Kelpie
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 02:58
  #763 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any truth to the rumour that a certain HR manager at Jetstar has been fired over the botched cadet scheme??
Why would Jetstar fire the individual while the spotlight is still focussed on the cadet scheme at the Senate Inquiry?

Would the Senators see this as evidence the scheme was botched?

Surely the decision to start the scheme goes to a higher level of management than HR.

MC
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 03:07
  #764 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mstr Caution

Surely the decision to start the scheme goes to a higher level of management than HR
Yes it does!! But here are the 5 stages of a project from my own management by experience manual:

1. Euphoria and Excitement [Cadet program Launch]
2. Disenchantment [Bruce gets busted by the X man]
3. Search for the Guilty [Internal search for who to blame]
4. Punishment of the Innocent [TN Gets the bullet]
5. Reward for the Uninvolved [Brucey Bonus issued for damage limitation]
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 03:33
  #765 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mstr Caution

Quote:
Surely the decision to start the scheme goes to a higher level of management than HR
Yes it does!! But here are the 5 stages of a project from my own management by experience manual:

Quote:
1. Euphoria and Excitement [Cadet program Launch]
2. Disenchantment [Bruce gets busted by the X man]
3. Search for the Guilty [Internal search for who to blame]
4. Punishment of the Innocent [TN Gets the bullet]
5. Reward for the Uninvolved [Brucey Bonus issued for damage limitation]
And now BB and AJ can float into the enquiry, say that they have assessed the business, were given flawed advice and have fixed the problem.

Problem is, you are still trying to undermine an industrial instrument AKA the EBA! There will be egg on Gillards face if this is not dealt with promptly.

Why is it not in the news headlines? "Qantas undermines Australian workers conditions, by employing staff via shelf company"

It's enough to make you sick.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 03:34
  #766 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kelpie,

Spot on.

There are many precedents of such events where those truly responsible and faced with an overwhelming force are heard to mumble as they enter the chamber....I am truly sorry for the acts of a relatively junior and inexperienced manager who was acting without authority and I have now rectified the situation.

Senators don't fall for it, there is no way that these events were not orchestrated by the highest levels of management and the Rat sanction.

For those who witness the events tomorrow and hear these words keep mumbling to yourself ...bull****.......
rodchucker is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 04:00
  #767 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would hope all pilots supporting Ben Sandilands by subscribing to Crikey - worth every penny.
Good point – I just subscribed.

Great work, Ben.
FlareArmed is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 04:21
  #768 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Is anyone able to record the hearing tomorrow? At least the Qantas bit would be good.
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 05:29
  #769 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keg, I'm jealous. Senator Xenophon enjoys popstar/cult status in the Hat household. I was a fan well before he cast his eye on our industry.

I fear however that he can't do it all on his own. Its an unstoppable machine this country of corruption and ineptitude. If integrity, transparency and ethics were introduced in Australia the whole place would grind to an almighty hault.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 05:38
  #770 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: cust
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Media

Why is it not in the news headlines? "Qantas undermines Australian workers conditions, by employing staff via shelf company"
Why?
I suggest because Qantas/Jetstar through their commercial agreements with the mainstream media, ensure that negative coverage is censored under with the threat of advertising budgets.

Channel 7
Channel 9
the Australian

With politicians receiving iPads and other key individuals receiving Chairman's lounge invites, it's no wonder things have gotten this bad!

Go Ben Sandilands! Men like he and the X-Man are a couple of the custodians of the future of this industry through the senate inquiry.
killa loop is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 07:10
  #771 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
slight thread drift..sorry..but if Sandilands article is true (the part that mentions the possible Joyce replacement), then its time this was made available in the media again....

Inquiry into first-class footsies - Travel - smh.com.au

My bold



Inquiry into first-class footsies

Email
Print
Normal font
Large font
Ben Cubby
July 31, 2007
Advertisement

Advertisement
A SENIOR Jetstar executive has been accused of engaging in 'funny business" with a woman on a fold-down seat in the first-class cabin of a flight from Melbourne to Los Angeles on Friday.

Bruce Buchanan, the airline's commercial general manager, was on Qantas Flight 93 to the US when the incident allegedly took place. After the lights went down on the 14-hour trip, a woman apparently moved to share his seat.

Another first-class passenger complained to a flight attendant, according to people in the cabin at the time.

Sources on the flight said it was not clear what was going on but there was no suggestion the pair were having sex. "It was just funny business," one source said.

It is unclear whether cuddling constitutes a breach of strict behavioural guidelines which apply to airline employees but the incident was enough for staff on the flight to prepare a report for Qantas management.

It raises questions about the behaviour of Jetstar employees, including senior executives such as Mr Buchanan, travelling on discounted staff flights.

Staff must wear "appropriate" clothes, not jeans, and show exemplary behaviour.

Last week Qantas, the parent company of Jetstar, was forced to reinstate a cabin supervisor sacked for breaching policy by taking chocolate-covered macadamia nuts from a flight.

The cabin steward, Philip Woodward-Brown, had been stood down immediately after the offending nuts were discovered on his person during a routine security check in Tokyo last year.

When the incident took place on Friday, Mr Buchanan was travelling to Los Angeles for a holiday.

A Jetstar spokesman confirmed last night the incident was being investigated but said the airline was yet to speak to Mr Buchanan about the complaint.

"We do not believe the event was of a serious nature. A full investigation will take place but we obviously want to hear Mr Buchanan's side of the story," the spokesman said.

Qantas also confirmed that it was investigating the incident but said it did not appear to be a serious offence.

Mr Buchanan, who could not be reached for comment, is due back from his holiday next week.
From my understanding, the CSM prepared a report, of which another crew member took a copy. The CSM was met by company security on arrival and was escorted from the aircraft, had the report confiscated, and was told in no uncertain terms, that this was never to be raised again. Can anyone with more knowledge expand??
astroboy55 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 07:20
  #772 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suggest because Qantas/Jetstar through their commercial agreements with the mainstream media, ensure that negative coverage is censored under with the threat of advertising budgets.
Warm, warmer..Bingo.

You know how we all pity those in the middle east with their governments controlling the media? Guess what..
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 07:24
  #773 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sources on the flight said it was not clear what was going on but there was no suggestion the pair were having sex. "It was just funny business," one source said.
A class act.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 07:57
  #774 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Danger

Ever since the episode of Bruce Buchanan and the alleged hanky panky I've kept it in my back pocket as a counter argument if ever someone tries to go me for something I've done wrong. I'd suggest that just about every action short of physically punching someone can now be over looked with the precedent that has been set with Bruce.

As you say Hat, a class act that one!
Keg is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 09:14
  #775 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Is the enquiry this Thursday or Friday ?

Last edited by John Citizen; 30th Mar 2011 at 09:58.
John Citizen is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 09:29
  #776 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
JC is that double irony because the hearing is tomorrow March 31! I'm hoping that tomorrow will be the last day of hearings so that the report can be tabled. This has gone way past what was originally intended but for very good reason. As for those who think that it won't change anything, it already has and has cost one J* exec his job. Of course it won't necessarily get rid of the person responsible for this fetid corporate culture but a start has to be made somewhere and at the very least will demonstrate to the HR department that they are accountable for their decisions.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 09:54
  #777 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Darwin
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
So...if it all turns to sh*t and the JQ cadets are stood down will that open up avenues for all the guys on the hold file that have been waiting for up to a year??
High_To_Low is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 10:00
  #778 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably not. They will just retrench from some of the scaled down services from Christchurch and japan runs!!
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 10:02
  #779 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still don't get why you would wait to get a job there when there have been 200,000 posts in 6 months on that very company.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 10:11
  #780 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
at the very least will demonstrate to the HR department that they are accountable for their decisions.
Wouldn't those in HR just be screening / interviewing & selecting candidates, then getting the candidates to the sign contracts that are provided to the HR department?

Wouldn't Flt Ops, IR or Legal department be actually writing up the said employment contracts?
Mstr Caution is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.