Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: Senate Inquiry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Mar 2011, 00:33
  #381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go John Laws, Joyce is making an arse of himself....he sounded a bit nervous to me!!!

.....well more spin!!!


So now Joyce admits that Jetstar Asia and Vietnam are regulated by the Singapore CAA. So Senator, not good speaking to CASA and the ATSB then - despite them flying VH registered aircraft!!!

More to Follow

The Kelpie

Last edited by The Kelpie; 15th Mar 2011 at 00:45.
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 02:32
  #382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Having heard Kate's drivel, I wonder if she's a stooge. Her knowledge was supoerficial, effort was abysmal and was prepared to gild the lily on some points. Red neck radio is alive an well.

The problem for AIPA is that hardly anyone listens to 2SM and John Laws: Laws' attitudes, like that of the pilots industrial campaign, is out of touch with reality.
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 02:36
  #383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
KB,

Least it is starting to get mainstream attention, last time these issues were getting this was 89!
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 02:49
  #384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: oz
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ken, were the bloke who got air time on John Laws bagging kate????
tiger19 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 02:55
  #385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Tiger,

Not at all - I wouldn't waste my money!!!

McG50,

2SM mainstream media? Yer joking, I hope. 2SM does not even feature in the Nielson rating surveys which measures listening audience. I suspect that it's SYD's lowest ranking station with OAPs being the typical listener. As for John Laws, he's as stale as the spilled beer you smell at the local pub! And he USED to be on a Qantas retainer in years past.

Last edited by Ken Borough; 15th Mar 2011 at 03:05.
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 03:01
  #386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Good to see some "balance" in the debate Ken , but I don't think Kate is the stooge here!

As for Joyce's drivel, and that was the real drivel, it's a shame that Lawsie' didn't ask the right questions. Perhaps he should have a good chat with his "Family member".
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 03:04
  #387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ken, Joyce did speak to Laws!

The problem for AIPA is that hardly anyone listens to 2SM and John Laws: Laws' attitudes,
Well AJ thought it important enough to go an air and speak to Laws, the other stations will follow, once the word gets out about the ground staff as well as the pilots. Joyce is presiding over a unhappy workforce who are at the end of their tethers with the management. Ten years of cost cutting with no end in sight, possibly has a lot to do with it.
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 03:10
  #388 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Laws maybe on a low rating radio station, however, he has just returned and I suspect f lot of his old listeners have returned with him, and regardless of their demographics, the topic is becoming warmer, warmer warmer..............
RENURPP is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 03:32
  #389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you sure Ken?

Laws read out an email from "Ken Borough" saying that Laws should not listen to "Drivel" from a Qantas Captains wife wanting to protect terms and conditions which are 20 years out of date etc etc.

Same name, same viewpoint and even the same word (Drivel) as you just used.

Coincidence? I think not.
speeeedy is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 03:43
  #390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
I didn't get airtime as I didn't call. Laws may have chosen to read an email from me but I don't know. Nor do I care. I went back to the ABC after a couple of minutes of cr@p from the pilots wife. Is there now another demographic like "Doctors' Wives"? I don't mind debate but when it's so unbalanced I just tune out.

Why the AIPA bloke got airtime is beyond me. I would keep him flying and get a professional spin-doctor on the job as he didn't advance your cause an ounce of good IMHO.
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 05:24
  #391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Ken, from your posts, it's obvious that you are a management stooge - I'm just interested to know whose position you are after?
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 05:51
  #392 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pity City
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ken, you're telling fibs again!

Were you so disinterested in Lawsie's program that you tracked down his email address and fired off an email? Is that what you are telling us?

Did you sent the email before or after you told AJ that he had better call the program to respond?

After listening to AJ, do you think he needs a professional spin-doctor too? Or was little Ms W putting out bush fires elsewhere in the media at the time?
33 Disengage is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 05:58
  #393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
33,

No, not telling fibs at all. I listened to Laws after having been told what was expected to be broadcast. He actually gave his email address on air so anyone could have written a repsonse to what was said. And no, I didn't hear AJ as I had moved on to the ABC, and if you follow PPRUNE you will see that I've been very critical of Qanrtas' PR efforts. Alan certainly does need a professional spin-doctor as much damage has already been inflicted on the Comapny as a result of poor media management.

GB - I'm my own person and certainly not a stooge for Management.
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:17
  #394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Safety is our first priority

LH are scanning aircraft for radioactivity, guess what the QF / JQ response was?

Jetstar, which is still operating flights in and out of Japan, said it was not specifically scanning planes for signs of radioactivity.
"From our perspective, we are continuing safe operations to and from Japan and closely monitoring the situation," a Jetstar spokesperson told Australian Business Traveller.
Qantas said it was not required to scan its planes for radioactivity.
"It is European policy for aircraft to be tested. We are monitoring the situation very closely and meeting all Australian Government requirements. Should this change, we will continue to meet all government requirements," spokesman Simon Rushton said.
THIS COMPANY IS A JOKE!!!
The Kelpie is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:51
  #395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
2SM - John Laws - Sydney's Talk, News and Entertainment Station

Podcast on there, the QF bit is from 46 mins.
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:55
  #396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tallong NSW
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems to me there is one reporter who is never going to be invited into the Chairmans Club.

Will apathy allow Qantas to off-shore more? – Plane Talking
denabol is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 06:58
  #397 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much truth is coming out of Japan?
Loss of face could be a factor in how much is being reported. Its a possibility and something to consider.

Another one to consider is that ultimately the airline wouldn't give a damn if there was a radiation risk. All they want is bums on seats and ops normal.

Had it been a volcanic ash issue it may be different. Thats a threat to the machinery and thats a different story entirely.

Sorry guys I've got my cynical hat on today.
My post from the Jq OOL thread. Surprise surprise turns out the estimates were grossly under quoted accorfing to this B. Sandilands article :Serene lies flow from Fukushima nuclear disaster zone – Plane Talking

Good on the Cabin Crew for saying no to that flight.

As for Mr Ken B? Well he is entitled to his opinion and just because he doesn't agree with the majority here doesn't mean he is wrong or QF management for that matter!

I CAN say this however: Don't come-a-whingin to me when all the experience pisses off overseas and you're left with cadet pilots from third world countries making an almighty mess of things! I'm already getting the giggles at the thought of it .

As for overpaid QF guys? Ken do you think the QF 32 families think they're overpaid? Again, just difference of opinions I suppose.

The way I see it is that QF pilots are actually trying to save AJ's job in the long term. He's got the most amazing case of tunnel vision I've ever seen. Its like a seriously bad day at the casino.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 11:51
  #398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Darwin
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE][/Jetstar, which is still operating flights in and out of Japan, said it was not specifically scanning planes for signs of radioactivity.
"From our perspective, we are continuing safe operations to and from Japan and closely monitoring the situation," a Jetstar spokesperson told Australian Business Traveller.
Qantas said it was not required to scan its planes for radioactivity.
"It is European policy for aircraft to be tested. We are monitoring the situation very closely and meeting all Australian Government requirements. Should this change, we will continue to meet all government requirements," spokesman Simon Rushton said.]

So I guess this means when the regulator say's

No need for fuel tests
No need for pax briefing
No need for crew briefing
And so the list could go on!

Does this mean that it then won't be required because regulation's say you need not, Surely common sense would prevail. You cannot put any cost saving figure on safety the fact is you must spend in the area to keep safety standards high
onedottoolow is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 13:36
  #399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AJ said

"Jetstar Australia buisness as an example is growing rapidly, Jetstar in January added 40% capacity to it's domestic operation, it's recruiting and growing it's buisness here..."
Now I'm confused, I have been on hold since mid last year and not herd anything about recruiting for Jetstar Australia.

no one
no one is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2011, 14:40
  #400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The cloud
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Won't hear anything if your only qualification is a sheppards ticket...(says the bloke who now can't figure out how many p's in sheppard)

Holding my breath and turning blue for some changes though...

Keep up the good work kelpie ben and senator x...

Last edited by Xcel; 15th Mar 2011 at 14:43. Reason: Spelt sheppard "shepard" and am still wrong I'm sure - now who really looks stupid
Xcel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.