Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qf LAME EBA Negotiations Begin

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qf LAME EBA Negotiations Begin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2011, 20:17
  #2021 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Sue,

Please be advised that ALAEA LAME members working for Qantas who will be covered by the proposed LAME Enterprise Agreement currently under negotiation will be taking Protected Industrial Action as follows –

Notification number

27

Date of commencement of action

Friday 14th October 2011.

Time of action

1600-2000

Participants

All LAME members who will be covered by the proposed Agreement who are rostered to work in Sydney.

Nature of action

A stop work meeting.

Please note that the ALAEA encourages members who are not rostered to work this period to accept any offer to cover the stoppage on overtime to ensure that Qantas passengers and services are not disrupted. Please contact the ALAEA office for any assistance you may require to facilitate this provision.

Notice to come out today.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 20:18
  #2022 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know there are others out there who don’t agree with the current union strategy. What we are seeing is a classic case of “group think”. I will give you the classic symptoms (Google it for yourself – it is quite interesting):
1. Illusion of invulnerability – we believe we are invincible
2. Tendency to moralise – oppositions to the unions position is viewed as weak, evil or unintelligent
3. Feeling of unanimity – all members share the leaders vision. Rather than appearing weak, members keep opposing views to themselves. This is due to the pressure of group solidarity and can distort the judgement of individual members.
4. Pressure to conform – formal and informal attempts are made to prevent divergent views
5. Opposing ideas dismissed – group members show favouritism to their own ideas
This phenomena isn’t just our issue, the same clowns who caused the GFC were also victim to this as they collectively didn’t want to see that something was wrong. We need to change course before New Piper’s predictions come true.
BP2197 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 20:19
  #2023 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
28 mil for MR Dixon in 2008,wasn't that the year Qantas posted a 45 mil profit,so one man out of 35,000 took 25% of the entire Qantas group profits,and this management have a problem with the unions.bugger me.
qf 1 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 20:45
  #2024 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exec pay is a just a little inconsistent isn't it. Here is a supporting article from SMH yesterday:
Theory of capitalism doesn't apply to executive pay, neither does the law of gravity
BP2197 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 21:32
  #2025 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BP2197,

Your point No 4 is exactly the reason why AIPA has asked its Pilot members to wear red ties. Its a classic 'silent' way of gathering and measuring support (sometimes fake) and increasing pressure on those members who may be toying with the idea of not participating or even worse, resigning from the union. It definitely sorts the men from the boys. In this case, the men are the ones who have an apposing view to that of the union and actually have the guts to express it.

NP
NewPiper is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 21:51
  #2026 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Media comment

Wider agenda in union stand-off with Qantas

October 11, 2011


Read more: Wider agenda in union stand-off with Qantas
The lens is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 21:53
  #2027 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It always takes no time at all before someone dis-appoints and turns what was starting to become a good discussion into a personal attack.
NewPiper is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2011, 22:23
  #2028 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The name angryrat says it all really!

but I'm sorry if that is the way you interpret my posts. My intention is to make observations and statements rather than expressing my personal opinion.

Anyhow, I'm going to back to the sidelines now to sit and watch it all unfold.

NP
NewPiper is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 00:28
  #2029 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hicksville, Alabama
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2UE Interview

Steve,

Congratulations on a great interview this morning with David Oldfield on 2UE this morning. It was great that he gave you some leeway to get your points across, which you did well.

Thanks to David Oldfield for being tough, but fair as well. Hopefully the message is starting to get out to the general public.

Now, If you can only get some of the Murdoch press to be a bit more balanced. That column by Andrew Bolt this morning wasn't. I don't think they even bother to research anything, or even pick up the phone to hear the other side.
kotoyebe is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 00:41
  #2030 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know what. Qantas are winning this media game. Not through reason, just through volume. They buy their media opportunities and no union can match that. We all know they are lying through their teeth and it turns the small number of fence sitting Qantas employees against them every time they spread rubbish.

Other union leaders and I only have limited opportunities for air time. I can guarantee though that a listener to any live media I do will only have to hear me speak once and they will at least realise that there are two sides to the story. In many of those cases the listener will be understanding of our plight. From that point in time, every lie that Qantas spread will work against them.

The river bank is a comfortable place to be.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 01:06
  #2031 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Poor old Olivia Wirth. She is stunned and outraged at the Fed Secs latest comments.
Lets hope all the Qantas execs are.

Fantastic, That had the desired affect then.

It would be good to see the Qantas Execs requesting their million dollar pay rises at the annual meeting with full day strikes happening. Will the fund managers still feed the pigs.
Toolpants is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 01:56
  #2032 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: location location
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unions telling the general public to fly other airlines!
Their claims can be right, wrong, fair or unfair but steering people away from their own income source isn't real bright.
And it can't help...
quagmire is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 02:08
  #2033 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 5th Dimension
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas:~Apology Airlines Again




Qantas launches anti-strike ad blitz

11 Oct 2011
By David Blight

Qantas has said it may continue to run its advertising campaign against union strikes if further disruptions occur, with full page print ads rolling out from yesterday.
The airline has launched a print campaign apologising for flight delays or cancellations, and has said it could run the campaign for as long as the unions continue to cause disturbances.
The print campaign, which launched yesterday and was created by Lawrence Creative Strategy, tells Qantas customers “We’re sorry”. It goes on to blame union action against the airline for delays and cancellations.
The ad reads: “We are doing all we can to minimise the impact of this action, but we know it has inconvenienced our customers and we sincerely apologise … We can’t give in to union demands that risk the future of Qantas … We urge these three unions to come to an agreement with Qantas that is fair and equitable.”
The campaign has already featured two separate executions, one which ran yesterday, and one which is running today. It is unclear if Qantas has any other executions planned.
The campaign runs across all major Australian newspaper titles, including The Australian, The Australian Financial Review, The Sydney Morning Herlad, The Age, The Daily Telegraph and others.
A spokeswoman for Qantas told AdNews that the campaign will run through the beginning of the week. However, she went on to say that the campaign may continue to run if the unions continue to cause disruptions.
Qantas has been caught up in a range of PR problems over the last year – including the grounding of some of its fleet, mass lay-offs and unions strikes. The airline recently called a global review of its creative and media agency arrangements for the first time in ten years, putting roster agencies M&C Saatchi, Ogilvy, Mojo, Wonder and ZenithOptimedia on alert.
~This is nothing more than a"boo hoo poor me" piece that is trying to garner sympathy(my bold)
fishers.ghost is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 02:27
  #2034 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've stood back and seen what happens when employees don't stand up for their jobs. The same people destroyed Ansett, closed down Sydney Heavy Maintenance, Roller Engine shops and component maintenance. There are countless examples.

When all is said and done it will be Qantas employees left to pick up the pieces. Passengers will return to support the very people who saved the airline. You need to see the big picture here. If they had their way with the APA fiasco Dixon would be $60 million richer and we would all be out of work.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 02:30
  #2035 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might be time for a Union sponsored retort in the same papers?

Perhaps outlining:
  • Executive managements disgsuting pay scales which are pulling tens of millions of unjustifiable funds out of the business
  • A breakdown in percentage points of how much QF's value has dropped since 'mini me' took over the helm (a nice share comaprison)
  • Outline every piece of evey dirty financial act of mischief QF have been pinged for (e.g freight fixing naughtiness)
  • A nice graph showing all the incidents, roller failures and other assorted goodies since their campaign of outsourcing stepped up
  • How about including a nice 'spider graph' showing the links between executives, management, family and friends to display the true worth of their 'moral compass' ??
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 02:43
  #2036 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On Uranus
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

new piper

Your point No 4 is exactly the reason why AIPA has asked its Pilot members to wear red ties. Its a classic 'silent' way of gathering and measuring support (sometimes fake) and increasing pressure on those members who may be toying with the idea of not participating or even worse, resigning from the union. It definitelysorts the men from the boys. In this case, the men are the ones who have an apposing view to thatof theunion and actually have the guts to express it.

N
So let me understand what your logic is. When over 90% of pilots voted for PIA in a confidential and individual vote, they may have not actually wanted to partake in industrial action. Your comments are somewhat perplexing but definately delusional.

Company management stooge here me thinks.
Anulus Filler is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 03:05
  #2037 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anulus,

That 90% number sounds great on face value, but don't discount the possibility that it could also mean 90% of the Pilots are wrong and may ultimately be proven to be the stooges here to use use your term.

Time will tell. The shareholders would be quite entitled to demand a quick closure to all LH ops and maybe mirror an Alitalia type re-birth.

NP
NewPiper is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 03:15
  #2038 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On Uranus
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Cactus
Might be time for a Union sponsored retort in the same papers?
Forget it. The papers would never want to bite the hand of that which feeds it. Let's face it, the longer this dispute goes on, the more money the media/papers make. That's why this whole event is sensationalized. It's paying for a lot of bills and will continue to do so for a long time to come. QF execs are only too obliging to piss as much money away as they can. Who said the media can't pull a good profit outside of an election year?

I guess it all ads up now as to why Qantas hardly advertised for quite some time before this dispute.
Anulus Filler is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 03:18
  #2039 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You clowns should stick to holding union sausage sizzles, waving your pathetic union banners and slapping each other on the back and laughing every time someone writes something negative about qantas. That's about all you seem capable of doing correctly.

Here's a new idea - Get back to work you bludgers!
victor two is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2011, 03:24
  #2040 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quagmire

Unions telling the general public to fly other airlines!
Their claims can be right, wrong, fair or unfair but steering people away from their own income source isn't real bright.
And it can't help
...


Quagmire, the only way we will have any affect is to first affect the profits.
If profits are affected, their jobs and bonuses may get affected.
That is all they are interested in.

If profits are still coming in, they wouldn’t care if a close family member died.

If they were serious about no upsetting passengers, they should advise them to use another airline for a while also. I would much prefer to be pre warned, fly virgin and get there than book a ticket on QF, get my flight cancelled and then see the CEO get a 70% pay rise.
Toolpants is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.