Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar Pilot texting during landing

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar Pilot texting during landing

Old 11th Jun 2010, 16:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,286
Received 316 Likes on 121 Posts
Jetstar Pilot texting during landing

From the SMH

Pilot 'texting during landing'

More than happy to wait for further information before commenting.
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2010, 16:45
  #2 (permalink)  
conflict alert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
have a read of (sorry, don't know how to 'link') TAIC (NZ) investigation report 03-004. PA31 controlled flight into terrain. This was an accident where the aircraft flew into terrain short of the runway at Christchurch flying the ILS with tragic results. One of the findings was the Pilots cell phone was being operated in the final 3 minutes of flight.
 
Old 11th Jun 2010, 17:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if its true it will easily come out - its childs play for the authorities to find out almost exactly where a phone was at a given time and whether it was being operated, provided it was actually on the network at the time.
pa60ops is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 01:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: far east
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it was a breakdown in SOPs maybe the new cadet pilots will alleviate that in the future. Everybody knows the younger generation dislike texting & the like

Please note the above is in no way meant to imply any texting was being carried. I'll wait for the official report.
preset is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 01:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 136
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
How does anyone know he/she was texting. Only the other pilot would know. If true then surely it would have all been kept in house and sorted.
billyt is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 02:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If true then surely it would have all been kept in house and sorted.
Are you suggesting it is standard practice to flout the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003?
Brutus is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 02:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought this issue was put to bed years ago.

I'll reserve my opinion till a final report is released.

Jetstar backflips over pilot accusations
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 04:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eagles Nest
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe his phone was switched on as in forgot to turn it off, and as the plane approached the airport his phone connected to the system and he recieved some texts. Can they tell if it was an incoming or out going text when they match up his text times with the landing times. They need proof , so CVR or other crew member as witness. Maybe go around was just unrelated . Wait for report
Toruk Macto is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 07:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Home
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not hard to forget to switch off the phone on departure if it's sitting inside a bag. Maybe this guy left his on and it went off as it came into range of a cell and the backlog of messages arrived, during landing.

pilots on an A321-200 travelling from Darwin received an on-board warning when the aircraft carrying 167 passengers was only 122 metres above the ground on approach
Whatever the reason for over-looking the gear, they appear to have selected landing flap (and triggered the config. warning) at less than 400ft. Is this normal in JetStar? What are the JQ stabilised approach criteria regarding flap?



Of course, it's always possible, even probable, that the halfwit, semi-literate "journalist" who wrote the article has the facts wrong.

Last edited by YoDawg; 12th Jun 2010 at 07:50.
YoDawg is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 07:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever the reason for over-looking the gear, they appear to have selected landing flap (and triggered the config. warning) at less than 400ft.
Larger jet aircraft will get a gear warning at 800ft rad alt (on approach)regardless of flap position if the gear is not down a locked.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 07:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 136
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Quote "Are you suggesting it is standard practice to flout the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003?"

Not at all. I am questioning that it really happened at all.
billyt is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 08:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the big fuss about anyway?

They were more than 10 times higher than the landing gear / go round thrust incident at tullamarine 2007.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 08:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does anyone know he/she was texting. Only the other pilot would know. If true then surely it would have all been kept in house and sorted.
Billyt - There was a previous incident where it was unable to be keep inhouse & sorted. See the ATSB report on tullamarine in 2007.

Besides, are you implying it should have been resolved between the flightdeck crew only, the airline only or discretly by the ATSB so the travelling public is left in the dark.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 08:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The very idea that
it would have all been kept in house and sorted
is what is leaving me a little bemused.

If true then surely it
is a reportable matter as required under the Act. Once the report is submitted to the ATSB, as required, it becomes a matter of public record.

Previous incidents would seem to give credence to the notion that "keeping it in house and sorted" is indeed the prevailing attitude.
Brutus is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 08:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Brutus, as the name implies maybe a bit brutal..... Otherwise next time someone farts on the flight deck that would be a 225 as it can also be a little incapacitating and therefore immediately reportable!

I am sure the intent of that post that got your attention was meant to allude to a most likely innocent error of leaving the phone on and receiving a text on approach. Regardless of why and how now, I guess now that it is news we will have to wait for the report and a possible outcome of a career ending instead of a career adjusted for the better, that is the sad part. We are human and that requires a humane outcome.......

Discipline in the cockpit is not innate, it is acquired from your fellow mentors. Errors are made on every sector, it is how we deal with those errors that separates our profession from most others. I give them the benefit of the doubt as fellow pilots and wish them a sensible outcome.
t_cas is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 09:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The event itself doesn't really interest me t_cas, as you pointed out, it's most likely human error. That sort of thing happens every day.

What I was hoping to explore was the idea of "keeping it in house."
Brutus is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 09:59
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: cyprus
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps..

........he was receiving instructions on how to land.
Simon Templar is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 10:11
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like journos on the prowl here....

It's quite obvious what happened. Airbus have developed an A320 App for the iPhone. The pilot was simply selecting Gear Down using this App. What's the problem?
A. Le Rhone is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 11:08
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A le ronda,

Point taken, as I understand, the Boeing apps are a little behind the airbus ones so I am a little frustrated!

Keep it nice......
t_cas is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 11:15
  #20 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It amazes me that most everybody , on this thread so far, has actually accepted the press bull$#*t report of pilot texting before the go around. Presumed to have been caused by a configuration warning that the press has diagnosed as not having selected gear down for landing. It has made headlines and national news on TV
HotDog is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.