Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Group A330 Changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Mar 2010, 07:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SYD
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas Group A330 Changes

Hi all,

As you may know the QF group has at least 6 additional A332s that will begin to be delivered from NOV this year.

VH-EBO will be delivered new to QF in November with the new QF domestic config/product. VH-EBO will directly replace A332 VH-EBJ which will then move across to JQ. (VH-EBJ is the only QF domestic A330 that doesnt have the new seats/IFE)

VH-EBP onwards will all be delivered to Jetstar.

Now any news on the talk of SYD-MNL, SYD-HNL, and some AKL-LAX with a possible extension to JFK all going A330?

Should be a few spare A330s once the B744s take over the SYD-NRT-SYD route.....
MyerFlyer is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 08:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 58
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard from a colleague who was speaking with a QF A330 management pilot recently that decisions were being made about whether to have fitted an underfloor cabin crew rest facility to two of these aircraft.

For the rumoured expansion of Onestar to Europe perhaps.......?
ditch handle is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 09:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
For the rumoured expansion of Onestar to Europe perhaps.......?
Onestar will NOT require a Crewrest facility!
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 09:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 58
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes that had occurred to me too.

Jump seats in full view of passengers are perfectly adequate for the cabin crew to sit on.
ditch handle is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 09:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who is paying for the 5 A332's that are going to JQI ? Not Jetstar I bet....

In fact, my mail is that the 'legacy carrier' is footing the bill, yet again...
mohikan is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 10:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: some dive
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
once the B744s take over the SYD-NRT-SYD route
Yes and the 744 boys and gals should not start getting toooo excited about the amount of drunken falls they will have down the Cage steps. Jokestar cannot replace a QF A330 route due to some bullsh*t agreement in place. Therefore the Irish pumper needs to have it replace a different type. Hence the 744, but for a wee time only now. I will bet my Scot left nut the orange disgrace will replace it before Xmas.
ratpoison is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 10:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 715
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Why not just give CX rights to fly direct OZ to Japan rather than force all the punters to transit HK. Wouldn't that be more logical
VR-HFX is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 11:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australasia
Age: 60
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Orange cancer continues to spread......love it!
fatigueflyer is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2010, 03:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ditch,

Would the underfloor CC rest not be required for AKL-LAX?
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 00:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who is paying for the 5 A332's that are going to JQI ? Not Jetstar I bet....
No-one (in their right mind) is going to take that bet on!
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 12:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australasia
Age: 60
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dutchroll, watch this space!!
fatigueflyer is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 19:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 58
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ditch,

Would the underfloor CC rest not be required for AKL-LAX?
Yes, but the FAAA give the company dispensation for that sector.
ditch handle is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2010, 15:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 40
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has there been any updates on the Qantas Group A332s orders. Is Qantas still getting a new build in Q4 2010?

Plus when are deliveries suppose to begin of the new build Jetstar A332s.
OliverGigacz is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 01:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have good intel that the A330 will be pulled from AKL-LAX & LAX-JFK around the end of the year due pax (premium) feedback & freight considerations. 744 to resume these services. Another case of accountants thinking they know best
slim is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 03:18
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slim
due pax (premium) feedback
I am not sure what the difference is between a 744 Skybed and a 330 Skybed that would raise a 'premium' pax concern. In particular the fact that J class and even P class is so poorly represented on that route and in particular, made up primarily of FF's and staff...
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 04:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,274
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Who is paying for the 5 A332's that are going to JQI ? Not Jetstar I bet....

In fact, my mail is that the 'legacy carrier' is footing the bill, yet again...


Last I heard the "Legacy" carrier owned Jet*...
TBM-Legend is online now  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 05:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I am not sure what the difference is between a 744 Skybed and a 330 Skybed that would raise a 'premium' pax concern. In particular the fact that J class and even P class is so poorly represented on that route and in particular, made up primarily of FF's and staff...
T-Vasis, the premium loads of commercial pax on the LAX-JFK-LAX sectors was very high in the first half of the year (ie prior to the A332 being substituted) and it is this genuine business traffic that is upset at being shoe-horned onto an A332 which doesn't have First & Premium Economy cabins and the Business cabin which is a lot smaller. Also, there is a lot of freight that is not able to be carried due to the volumetric limits of the A332 hold - freight on that route is lucrative due to the low numbers of wide-body aircraft operating across the US.

Last I heard the "Legacy" carrier owned Jet*...
TBM, the thing that pisses mainline staff off is the creative accounting (& lack of transparency) that senior Qantas Group executives use to make it look like Jetstar has lower costs per seat kilometre than its rivals. It certainly would make interesting reading to find out how Jetstars DOC's are dealt with in the "Groups accounts".

Wrt future A332 deliveries (the higher gross weight aircraft), they do not appear on the list of A330 deliveries on the QF Flight Crew website which would indicate that they are not planned to have Oz registrations. Previously, Jetstar management indicated that Jetstar Asia would be getting 2 A332's but I believe that they will be getting all 5 HGW versions which will enable them to operate the ATH & FCO routes as well as NRT etc.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 06:53
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SYD
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I guess it makes sense... QF have 3 A380s due soon which will then free up 3 B744s to move back onto the AKL-LAX and LAX-JFK routes.

This will then free up intl A330s to be used else where. Joyce has already hinted at increasing services to Asia with HKG, PVG, and NRT all performing well.
MyerFlyer is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 07:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Going Boeing
premium loads of commercial pax on the LAX-JFK-LAX sectors was very high in the first half of the year
Are you able to validate that the customers in J/P are actually commercial fare customers?

Originally Posted by Going Boeing
business traffic that is upset at being shoe-horned onto an A332 which doesn't have First & Premium Economy cabins
I am not sure Premium Economy is a 'premium traffic' cabin. J/P are the premium customer.

If freight is so lucrative and QF has no restrictions on freight carriage, then why did QF switch to a 330? The yield from freight alone would almost warrant operating a 744 daily? I am not sure this is a major component for QF, otherwise I would think the downgrade would be somewhat unusual?

Traffic numbers on the JFK run are certainly not inspirational and considering rights are limited to ex AUS traffic, I see great economic benefits for QF to operate a 330 instead to secure the right mix of passenger numbers, yield and operating costs...
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2010, 07:54
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Are you able to validate that the customers in J/P are actually commercial fare customers?
From my own experience flying that route and from the LAX & JFK Airport Managers - the JFK Airport Manager didn't want the change in aircraft type but her superiors said that "it was going to save millions".

I am not sure Premium Economy is a 'premium traffic' cabin.
QF Commercial certainly considers them to be 'premium traffic'.

If freight is so lucrative and QF has no restrictions on freight carriage, then why did QF switch to a 330?
Boston Consulting Group is looking at every aspect of the Qantas operation trying to find ways to reduce costs - this was their idea but as is usual when people look only at the accounting figures, they come unstuck on operational matters (eg the ATI B767 Freighter operating across the Tasman - BCG didn't understand ETOPS requirements & that aircraft only has 60 mins single engine approval).

The other aspect of the A330 JFK ops is how many pax have we lost to the opposition on the AKL-LAX-AKL sectors? The B744 (2 class with 412 seats) had high average load factors on the route and now we operate the route with an aircraft with only 60% of the capacity.
Going Boeing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.