QF 744's to op with 13 crew
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QF 744's to op with 13 crew
Watch this space but in the next day or so you are going to see flights (747-400's) starting to operate with only 13 cabin crew due to cosmetic config changes.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The brighter side of life.
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These flights have been operating since the beginning of July. With the cosmetic changes to the aircraft, the 13 crew complement actually works very well and I found, was indeed easier then a 15 or 16 crew flight in normal config.
Regards
Regards
Registered User **
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This seems to be an amazing statement....
Is this because of service changes?
What do you mean by cosmetic changes?
How could having 3 less crew work better?
Not attacking you just curious.....
the 13 crew complement actually works very well
What do you mean by cosmetic changes?
How could having 3 less crew work better?
Not attacking you just curious.....
Registered User **
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going Boeing...Are the pilots the only crew on an aircraft?????
D & G is for ALL aspects of aviation....that means all aviation not just the flight deck.
D & G is for ALL aspects of aviation....that means all aviation not just the flight deck.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The answer is that QF cabin crew are not allowed to play there anymore, because people like Lowerlobe don't know how to follow rules.
The rules here are far more relaxed.
The rules here are far more relaxed.
LL, you missed my point. I was not being derogatory of C/C but I was pointing out how stupid it is to think only in terms of your own working environment. It takes many staff both on the ground and in the air to get the pax safely from A to B. As this post was clearly aimed at the issue of C/C establishment on QF aircraft then the Cabin Crew forum would be the most appropriate place to post it.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find it hard to understand why tech crew can't understand why they aren't considered to be at the top of the tree in a "SERVICE INDUSTRY".
It's just common sense isn't. Cabin crew are the faces that the passenger......oops.....on no.......ahhhh.... hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!.
Sorry....tried a windup......broke up laughing!
It's just common sense isn't. Cabin crew are the faces that the passenger......oops.....on no.......ahhhh.... hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!.
Sorry....tried a windup......broke up laughing!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can anyone elaborate on the config changes?
ps I don't see why this thread shouldn't be on a "Airline and RPT issues in Australia, enZed and the Pacific" forum.
You fly-boys really need to take a chill pill sometimes
It takes more than pilots to make an airline...
ps I don't see why this thread shouldn't be on a "Airline and RPT issues in Australia, enZed and the Pacific" forum.
You fly-boys really need to take a chill pill sometimes
It takes more than pilots to make an airline...
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hicksville, Alabama
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These cosmetic configs have been running for a few weeks at least. The official line was that it was to align the saleable configs better with demand. So as there is less demand for P and J at the moment and more demand for PY and Y, they are using seats from the higher cabins, but selling them as a lower class. Nothing new in this. They have been doing this for years from time to time. It's just become a little more permanent due the the GFC.
If you remember, they stated that they will no longer offer P class to various destinations including SFO, and EZE. But they are still using 4 class aircraft. So they can sell more PY and Y by utilising the P seats (as J class I presume).
So I guess the other reason they have done this is to reduce costs. Instead of crewing and catering 4 classes, they only need to do it for 3. Small savings I would have thought, but I'm not an airline manager. Some of the cosmetic configs are quite wierd. IIRC, one has part of the J cabin as J, and the other as PY.
If you remember, they stated that they will no longer offer P class to various destinations including SFO, and EZE. But they are still using 4 class aircraft. So they can sell more PY and Y by utilising the P seats (as J class I presume).
So I guess the other reason they have done this is to reduce costs. Instead of crewing and catering 4 classes, they only need to do it for 3. Small savings I would have thought, but I'm not an airline manager. Some of the cosmetic configs are quite wierd. IIRC, one has part of the J cabin as J, and the other as PY.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mostly at home
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gasp,
13 Crew ...... Let's see ... 13 crew, minus 2 pilots leaves .......
and they need 12 CC to be legal ... hmmm GD lives!
Oh .... you mean CABIN crew......
Or is the upper deck the new crew rest lounge?
N
13 Crew ...... Let's see ... 13 crew, minus 2 pilots leaves .......
and they need 12 CC to be legal ... hmmm GD lives!
Oh .... you mean CABIN crew......
Or is the upper deck the new crew rest lounge?
N
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How many crew do we have on the Dugong and how many do SIA have?
Pontius Funbags and Going Boeing,Can you read the 2 words highlighted above?
Back to thread, this is about the reduction in cabin crew once again.Which we all know you will agree with and we know why.
An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.
Back to thread, this is about the reduction in cabin crew once again.Which we all know you will agree with and we know why.
Last edited by Tidbinbilla; 1st Aug 2009 at 23:55. Reason: NO NAMES!!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the thread is titled "QF 744's to op with 13 crew".
This is the first I have heard of it anyway so I would say it is just a rumour at this stage and an exaggeration as it would only be for specific configurations.
If it comes to fruition, I would guess that it would be for the 2 class 744 only, which means a reduction of one in line with the 4 class 744.
No biggy really and if it's gonna save a few jobs, I don't see a problem.
This is the first I have heard of it anyway so I would say it is just a rumour at this stage and an exaggeration as it would only be for specific configurations.
If it comes to fruition, I would guess that it would be for the 2 class 744 only, which means a reduction of one in line with the 4 class 744.
No biggy really and if it's gonna save a few jobs, I don't see a problem.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the thread is titled "QF 744's to op with 13 crew"
Posted by twiggs
I don't see a problem
this is about the reduction in cabin crew once again.Which we all know you will agree with and we know why
Does SIA operate their 744's and A380's with more cabin crew than we do?
YES or NO
Here is another simple question.
Can you access PPrune from the BOS desk?
YES or NO
The office loves acronyms so here is another FOL.
Last edited by Tidbinbilla; 1st Aug 2009 at 23:52. Reason: NO NAMES!