Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar looking for Contract FOs

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar looking for Contract FOs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2009, 03:49
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Redsnail ,
Was that an impulse posting?
What's changed since '06 '07?
Would they be stepping upon someone's toes?
I think the answer might have something to do with the reversal in the Supply/Demand equation since then.
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 07:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 478 Likes on 129 Posts
Dashim....is that figure net or gross?
framer is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 07:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 263
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
The contract FO's are to ensure that at least someone on the flightdeck has a clue as to what the A320 is doing. As only a couple of the Captains have any Airbus experience, the regulatory scrutiny the operation would otherwise be under would be more than Jq could muddle their way through.

$10K NZ/ month for what is effectively a training Captain position is a long from market rate. If the flightdeck is frosty, it'll be because of the inverted cockpit gradient.
Karunch is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 08:23
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: at home
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey screwballs, you been into WLG in an A320?, even AirNZ avoids taking them in there because of the local wx conditions. EasyJet probably has a bit more time en-route to these destinations; these will be little 1 hour hops with every 3rd sector into one of these tricky ports...Will be earning their money doing 85 hrs/month of that eh?
murdoch_disliker is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 09:58
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
give me a break. easy fly into more difficult destinations much more often than you ever knew existed. they are good drivers and they are well trained, not just checked as is the way in the southern hemisphere.
scrotometer is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 10:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: -
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes.

And how long do you think it takes to fly from Belfast to Glasgow or Belfast to Liverpool?

This is detracting from the conversation so I'll just say it: you have a bigger willy.
Screwballs is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 10:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: .
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Murdoch, we all do ok going into Funchal, or Innsbruck to name just a couple. Look at the tricky local weather conditions they get there!!!!! The contract requirement was not for new FO's so that they have got good experience.

I am not taking anything away from flying into these places, sure they are tricky and have their own little traps but please don't assume that we don't have our own very tricky little places to fly into around Europe!
one post only! is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 11:26
  #28 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,669
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
blow.n.gasket, no, not an impulse reply (never worked for them. )
The poster above asked would they (the contractors) be stepping on toes. Your reply was "What do you think Einstein?".

My reply was to simply point out that QF have sent excess (at the time) FOs to easyJet for a fixed contract.



As an aside, my thoughts are CTC are trying to find work for their new FOs now that the European market has dried up. Since easyJet et al used to hoover up any CTC cadet, CTC are now finding that many new cadets are without either any job or a permanent one. (easyJet now take the CTC cadets on for 6 months and then release them)

Since the NZ contract specifies a certain level of experience, CTC and easyJet have come up with a solution. Offer the experienced FOs (who probably did their training in NZ) a chance to fly around there for a couple of months and then there'll be more "room" for easyJet to continue to take on the freshly minted CTC cadets.
redsnail is online now  
Old 4th May 2009, 11:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Innaminka
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZALPA has given notice that it is taking Qantas and JC to court to attempt to stop the closure of the CHC base. These are not petty arguements, JC may have violated the terms of the CEA it has with its pilots, and the ERA (Law).

Any pilot thinking of taking a job with Jetstar NZ before this is sorted out (I'm sure Jetstar NZ would love to hear from you) is adding another cut to the throats of the JC CHC pilots.

I'd call them scabs if they joined now. If you know of anyone grabbing this 'great opportunity' to fly in NZ, please let them know of this court case so they can have a better idea of what is going on.
NoN1 is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 15:35
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: -
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the heads-up.

Call me a scab.
Screwballs is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 19:17
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: mel
Age: 51
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have flown into many challenging airports in europe/middle east/africa in my time with a uk charter airline on the 321 so i can assure people there are more than 2 in the world and i'm sure easyjet pilots fly to a few of them.

Easyjet have sound training and is a quality SOP driven airline which employs good pilots.

The only 'frosty' reception an ezy fo would receive would be if he went to a rural flying school and talked to the GA prop spinners who believe a job flying jets and a hundred grand plus salary is so long overdue for them that it makes them bitter and vent their frustration on anonymous internet forums
100knots is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 21:38
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: new zealand
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
100 kts. I agree with you, not sure where you are coming from with the last bit. Note the above Post where they would be hounded as Scabs, that is the attitude I was referring to and there is a sound basis for it. But not how we should treat our short term visiters i think. Oh i went to a rural airfield and spun the prop yesterday and it was great
saabsforever is offline  
Old 4th May 2009, 23:19
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: southeast asia
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Karunch, from what we hear, most of the capts going are very experienced. Just some wanting to get home etc... From what I have heard from a few trainers there, the few guys going across from jet* oz upgrading, are all experienced captains from other types (boeings,fokkers etc) who have been stuffed around from the deals that happen behind closed doors /recent moves etc, and are looking at getting back to the leftseat. Some are even from enzed, so I wouldnt worry about that to much.
To call these guys scabs is simply stupid, and shows the lack of understanding of the situation. I believe the companies group of unions, aipa,afap and the jpa have all done nothing to change the conditions, and are even giving advise to the guys/members going across.
Good luck to em, it would be nice to get back home....
pigdriver is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 00:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pigdriver did you actually proof read what you wrote?
You wrote:
"I believe the companies group of unions, aipa,afap and the jpa have all done nothing to change the conditions, and are even giving advise to the guys/members going across."


Have a quick think about what you wrote. Aipa, AFAP, and the JPA have no legal jurisdiction in NZ, that would be the domain of NZALPA .

Why do you think JetStar management with the blessing of "The Queen " at Qantas are so keen to continue the program of divide and conquer?
The more things change ,the more they stay the same!
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 00:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bkk
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tricky Little Airports.

Dear Mr Murdoch.
I got the offer.Must admit, no 320 time, and havent operated into NZWN or NZQN, but.........have 10500 hours heavy jet, 17500 hours total time, 9000 hours Boeing glass cockpit, have been into VNKT 47 times, including some very inclement weather, all in 757/767, also all over Africa, M.E. and Asia, including some very dodgy airports, oh.....how about DILI in a 757 at MLW..........5 times, take a look at the charts for that place......will tighten up your gonads on short final.Also did TRE work on 767 with 250 hour trainees....thats right the real airplane not the SIM....with SE flying near the ground or on it.....I could go on, but you get my drift.Do you think I might hack it into WLG or QTN ??. What a lot of crap.
piratepete is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 01:33
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
spinner at the ekka

i once went on the spinner at the ekka and spewed. bloody horrible, dagwood dogs and fairy floss all over the joint. so i can tell you blokes a few stories.

come on gents, they are only aeroplanes

can't we all be friends
Clipster is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 03:24
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: at home
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, such a lot of testosterone. So you start up an airline that operates into 2 very tricky airports (out of a total of 5), 1 of which has a black star rating from IFALPA.

My point is not that Queenstown and Wellington are the trickiest airports in the world.
My point is: do you start an operation into these airports with a mixture of; time on type and never operated there, and no time on type and have operated there??

On that note, the most experienced Queenstown guys from within the Qantas group have been basically told to shove off. ie the Christchurch based Jetconnect guys!!
murdoch_disliker is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 03:45
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey screwballs, you been into WLG in an A320?, even AirNZ avoids taking them in there because of the local wx conditions
For the record they do- all the Air NZ trans Tasman services out of WLG are A320s.
kmagyoyo is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 05:24
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NZ
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed...Air NZ do NOT intentionally avoid Wellington with the A320...as stated, there are at least 2 of them there every night ex the Tasman routes.
Having flown the A320 into Wellington on quite a few occasions, I can tell you it is not a big deal....would I feel as comfortable on a crappy day as in a 737? Maybe not, but that's just because I've not been there as many times in the Airbus. Most Air NZ pilots will tell you the same thing.
I do agree that leaping into WLG and Queenstown with inexperienced crews is not a good idea, but you only get experience through exposure. Any Captain (or F/O) with a bit of experience and a lot of common sense will have no problems with either place....you don't need to be superman!
BTW I think I've flown into WLG over 10 000 times in my career....only had big concerns a handful of times.
distracted cockroach is offline  
Old 5th May 2009, 09:21
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: gamma quadrant
Posts: 275
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
mate you just burst their bubble.The two most demanding airports in the entire world, nowhere else has wind or terrain. yeah right.
propaganda is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.