Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Scare Tactics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 08:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scare Tactics

This just in:

Just watched it on Ch7 news that Qantas is suing Transport Workers Union for the last baggage handlers work stoppages, something like 45 million dollars lost during that stoppage (not sure) Q says its reputation suffered after that baggage handler's work stoppage which caused a whole airport of baggage pile up etc etc as if they were always on time to begin with.

I really thought the team managers could have pitched in to help in that situation seeing 500 managers made no contribution at all and is shown the door.

The news report says this is unprecedented as Qantas had never ever sued a Union before.

Not sure when this will appear in web sites as news.

Let this be a subtle warning from the company that it will not tolerate any industrial action, they will take legal action. Whether you like the outcome of the job slashing or not, it will proceed, and if you take any industrial action, it will retaliate.

I think we are beginning to see AJ's true colors coming out now.
iriver88 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 08:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess that is the difference between protected and unprotected industrial action.
Starts with P is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 08:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Close to home
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Union Stupidity

What an illjudged,illtimed thing to do.Striking in this environment.Unprotected strike action to boot.Joyce is showing that he is an excellent bussinessman who will not be treated in such a cavalier manner.
This is 2009 not 1968
blackguard is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 08:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not the smartest move, engaging in unprotected industrial action.

And I believe some "senior" baggage handlers are a little bit nervous, after they traded their "last on - first off" principle in a recent EBA.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 11:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as if they were always on time to begin with.
I was operating on the day the strike happened...we were on time....until we landed and sat on a taxi way for 40 odd minutes. Our gate wasn't available as other aircraft were delayed due to the strike. Our pax weren't too happy either, standing around for 3 hours waiting for their bags (which, was not anywhere near as long as some other pax waited..)

Im all for standing up for what people believe in..but this strike was in my opinion a complete act of stupidity, and i do not support it in any way. I was actually disgusted with the proceedings that day. I'm glad QF are seeking compensation, the damage done that day was severe, and the TWU need to be held accountable.
astroboy55 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 11:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
All you little kids going about the rules and inconviencies of it all!
I mean come on WTF do you think a strike is about? FFS we have become such little precious Gems get over it!
Workers can and WILL strike regardless of laws and customers it is THEIR right!
Without it the next position is revolution!
I will always support all strike action by any workers it is a fundamental right!
Law means nothing
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 11:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 350
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
you shouldn't be surprised this is what Hawke and the fat man did in 1989 !! So I guess the TWU will get the same union support that the pilots got in that year. ZERO
mates rates is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 11:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that the right to strike is a fundamental one.

However, you need to pick your battles.

You should strike as part of a proper plan to actually achieve something, not just strike for the sake of it to cause damage to your company, and nothing else.

The TWU made false claims as to the reason for the strike, and didn't have any actual logical demands.

The Engineers action was far more considered and part of a master plan to achieve a goal, and most unionised parts of the company supported them. This was the TWU throwing the toys out of the cot, and so have not enjoyed the same support.
A Comfy Chair is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 11:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
I support unions but, as someone old enough to remember the BLF, the MUA, The Painters and Dockers, the Storemen and Packers and their petrol strikes of the 70's, the British auto unions and some of their irresponsible use of untrammelled power, I agree that checks must be in place to avoid abuse of industrial power. Particularly when it is ideologically based or purely politically motivated.
The main reason the AFAP got creamed because they didn't play by the rules. The TWU is not above the rules either.
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 11:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Ok So where are the checks of all the outrageous CEO and manager pork barreling?
Its very easy to blame past unions but quite frankly they pale in comparison to the rorting of Company management the last few years honestly. But most just find it east to blame the unions! lol while they relish in the very conditions they gave them!

I disagree its always a workers right to stop work just as its a companies right to get rid of workers come on, it all justice!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 12:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Law means nothing.

AoA, If you truly believe you have the right to strike no matter how illegal that strike may be you are absolutely wrong. How the hell do you expect to get the public to support you if you conduct "wildcat" strikes, just because you believe you can strike whenever you feel like it.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 12:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Simple, Because we Can!

Its a concept not fully understood by modern whipper snappers but basically its a fact because we CAN!

Such a simple fact really! lol!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 12:49
  #13 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Because we can
And under the law of the land, whether one agrees with the law or not, they can take legal action if one engages in other than protected industrial action.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 13:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
And with no disrespect to any posters this is why the western world as we know it is plummetting while emerging new superpowers like China and India will overtake within several years, the "Can Do" attitude has gone it is all about laws and what we can and can't do, quite sad really...

As I said before Stuff the Law! A Strike is a moral right and until we start doing it in earnest we will keep bickering to a final demise. Who cares about Law, FFS

It will happen but too late I guess we have been too moulded by governments.

think outside your square for once people!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 13:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I might consider it a moral right to shoot my neighbour's dog for making an unholy racket.

This would not make it legal. I might still go ahead with that plan but if discovered, I would be charged. I could carry on about how society was going to hell because I couldn't defend my right to peace and quiet, but it would make no difference to the outcome.

As for China, I wouldn't care to hold an unauthorised strike there.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 14:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saint Malo France
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 3 Posts
Some Facts

1. the twu asked qantas permission for (15 minute) meetings of it's members around australia .

2.qantas response : 15 minute meeting means docking of twu members pay for 4 hours .

3. aj and qantas speak with "fork tongues" and are not up-front in their dealings with their employee's or the qantas customers or the general public.

4.they want to outsource baggage handling to a "company" that "sign's" people up to johnny howard "work choice" agreements.

cheers
mustard
dijon moutard is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 14:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
I could carry on about how society was going to hell because I couldn't defend my right to peace and quiet, but it would make no difference to the outcome.
Enough said! Thats Why the West is doomed! No one is prepared to fight anymore?

Meanwhile back in the Eastern Ranch .....

No idea absolutely no Idea!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 15:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
while emerging new superpowers like China and India
Err...yeah...

China and India are emerging because of their strong unions, emphisis on workers rights and Citizens propensity for saying "Stuff the law".

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth.....
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 21:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1998
Location: somewhere in the nth of Oz, where it isn't really cold
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
probably a moot point, however there is no longer any such animal as
johnny howard "work choice" agreements
The Voice is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2009, 22:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That hero of the trade union movement R J L Hawke as Prime Minister, watched the precedent being set in 1989, despite trades hall being reticent.

So today if a company resorts to that same tactic, then the unions will just have to deal with it. They live under the same laws as the rest of Australia.
zube is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.