Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jet* on NZ domestic??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Oct 2008, 03:09
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Someday I will find a place to stop
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 6 Posts
And then when they start their domestic ops they will do that from their Christchurch / Auz base? Is that feasible?!
DeltaT is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2008, 09:53
  #62 (permalink)  
BGQ
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wanaka
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool JQ A 320s

Somebody else may be able to confirm this but my understanding is that JQ A320s have less grunt than Air NZs and will have some problems operating off Rwy 34 at Wellington. They also are restricted at Queenstown and Rotorua so JQ has significant problems with entry to NZ domestic IF this is true?
BGQ is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 20:46
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Dog House
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at both their websites:
Jetstar 24,480lbs
AirNZ 26,500lbs

Good point BGQ. Is that enough to keep Jetstar out of a domestic network in NZ??
horserun is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2008, 04:49
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queenland, Australia
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BGQ and horserun, I'm not sure why but those figures are incorrect. JQ A320's are no different to NZ's as far as engine rating is concerned (IAE's with 26.5k rating).

As far as I know, there are no current restrictions for the A320 to operate in to or out of Wellington.
aulglarse is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2008, 03:30
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Off track, again
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somebody else may be able to confirm this but my understanding is that JQ A320s have less grunt than Air NZs and will have some problems operating off Rwy 34 at Wellington. They also are restricted at Queenstown and Rotorua so JQ has significant problems with entry to NZ domestic IF this is true?
Wouldn't be a problem at domestic weights. Rotorua is a potential problem but about to have the runway extended there.
aerostatic is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 07:43
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So whats the latest ? Will crews be based in NZ or in OZ ? Tell us what the horses mouth said today.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 09:45
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Starting off with 1 A320 based in Auckland with AKL crews.

Do JQ have a similar or close Pilot salary's to what ANZ A320's crews give? Mabye some transfers??
Sunstar320 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 10:03
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sunstar

No.

Pilots to the opposition? Not likely.

It'll take about 18 months but my money is on the following..........

JetConnect "Sorry boys, we're closing up shop. Thanks for all your help."
JetConnect pilots: "****."

Jetstar "Hello boys, we've got some shiny new planes here, complete with a sh!thouse contract and payscales. Give us a call when you got A320 on ya licence..."

JetConnect Pilots: "****"

To say JQ and QF and NZ and PacBlue are all going to survive on the NZ maintrunk is insane.

Sadly, if its cheaper to make someone redundant than train him for the new job, can it go any other way?

Anyone see it any differently?

Edit: I apologise if it seems insensitive to any JetConnect guys. Just an opinion.
waren9 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 12:20
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
JetConnect "Sorry boys, we're closing up shop. Thanks for all your help."
JetConnect pilots: "****."
I would be surprised to see that. I think it is safe to assume that QF is not going to remove the red tails from either the Tasman or domestic NZ. So if we take that as a given, then for your scenario to come into being QF would have to replace JC ops with mainline ops. What would be their motivation for doing that? Certainly not cost base or yield.

o say JQ and QF and NZ and PacBlue are all going to survive on the NZ maintrunk is insane.
I agree. There is only one player there that doesn't have rich parents, see ya.
framer is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 22:26
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if an article that I read this morning (it's an e article, and I didn't take notice of who published it) where Buchanan was interviewed, is a true indication of his plans, then it will be us Aus-based JQ pilots who say "...****", and the Jetconnect pilots who say "...Feckin choice cuzzy bro"!!

He's quoted as saying that the delay to the B787 is good, because it gives JQ time to bed-in the A320 plans for NZ, prior to possibly introducing the Nightmareliner across the Pacific from - of all places - CHC.

Ah...the notion of loyalty is, if not dead, then a one-sided concept (and not from their side).

Now...what's Etihad's/Emirates'/Korean's/Air China's/Asiana's/Cathay's phone number????

RAD_ALT_ALIVE is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 01:56
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Warm & Sunny
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....and what about FlyDubai, starting up mid 2009 and looking for DEC's; with 54 new 800's ordered and a tax free package of about $225,000AU (or possibly more now the AU$ is down).

www.flydubai.com
Alien Role is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 10:33
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NZ
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"As far as I know, there are no current restrictions for the A320 to operate in to or out of Wellington."

Not for the Air NZ ones there aren't.....now. Air NZ use a computerised Take Off Data Calculator system that ACARS' the TOD to the aircraft (or Flight Planning room) Without this system (which I believe Jetstar don't have), using the tabulated figures from the individual runway take off charts, there were payload restrictions on RWY34. Admittedly these were for trans-Tasman flights. I don't think there would be any problems with domestic fuel loads.
This system made a huge difference to the amount of thrust reduction available on take-offs on all runways (with associated fuel and maintainance cost savings) and meant basically unrestricted loads out of PMR, DUD (03) as well as WLG (34).
distracted cockroach is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2008, 19:21
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: was south, now north
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar have advertised in the auckland weekend herald employment section for 3 senior person roles for a NZ AOC.
CI300 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2008, 02:04
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Za farzer land
Age: 53
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetconnect pilots: ****! John borghetti has just announced to jetconnect that its 300/400 fleet will be replaced with 737-800s throughout 2009 starting mid 2009.

Hmmmm? Looks like Jetconnect lives to see another day.
Fruet Mich is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2008, 06:34
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a piece of this puzzle still to be revealed...

Jetstar are setting up a NZ AOC to operate where? Tasman, domestic, Pacific??
Jetconnect getting B738 domestic;
PB operating B738 domestic/south pacific;
Air New Zealand doing all of the above.

Somethings got to give. Is the B738 for the QF brand a smoke screen??
rescue 1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.