Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Election Aviation Policies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 21:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 14 Posts
Election Aviation Policies

The Labour party quietly released its aviation policies last night.
Too little too late one could say.

The only media that appears to have run with the release has been the Australia's aviation section.

It was in 1989 that the ALP said that aviation was vital to the economic well being of Australia.
The last minute release of its aviation policies does not reflect those words.

The Australian reports that labour wants to establish a 20 year plan for aviation, tackle industry fragmentation and promote a more cohesive government approach if it wins power.

The Liberals on the other hand have opted to inject monies into an aviation tech college in WA plus put monies into an Royal aero club controlled scholarship scheme to raise the number of new commercial pilots. A certain regional airline has got involved here with assisted students being in effect bonded to it for several years.
Again too little too late. The problems of aviation right now were apparent to the industry a long time ago but still nothing happened until election time.

We can but wait and see what the outcome is to be tomorrow. I do not hold my breath.

It is apparent that aviation does not give many votes so it can be played with like a football until the last minute and then make a shoot-from-the-hip policy decision, sometimes in the favour of the best spin doctor's employer.

This country is the loser.
runway16 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 02:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: sydney,NSW
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

“Positions Wanted” advertisement in one of the major newspapers after Whitlam got his marching orders.
Previous head of large aviation concern seeks position in Transport. Prefer ships or trains.
Apply Charlie J & Co
Bye Bye Mark! Another in a long line of failed Ministers in Aviation/Transport. Will the shadow Minister be any different……I think not? Too busy feathering their own nests.
vans is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 03:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Thumbs down

My correspondence with Rudd has confirmed that it is Labor party policy to impose a curfew on BNE airport - how backward is that.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 03:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LABOR’S STATEMENT ON AVIATION 2007
Martin Ferguson AM MP
Shadow Minister for Transport
CAMPAIGN 2007
Aviation is a lifeblood industry for Australia – a critical service for our economy, our regions and linking us to the world.
Australia has a proud aviation history, but we have no aviation plan for the future.
The industry has rallied to recover from the impact of 9/11, the demise of Ansett, SARS and the Bali bombings – with unprecedented growth fuelled by the resources boom, low cost carriers and larger aircraft into regional airports.
But the Howard Government has not prepared for this growth. It has continued in spite of the Howard Government’s mismanagement and inaction, but this can not continue.
Aviation activity is predicted to double by 2020, but our airlines are cancelling services on a daily basis because they can’t get pilots.
Regulatory reform has been slow and divisive. The Deputy Prime Minister has resorted to an external investigator to sort out differences between the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
Agencies are not aligned on a clear policy direction.
General aviation is the nurturing ground for future commercial pilots and aviation workers, but the sector has been neglected.
Safe, comfortable and affordable air travel is a reality for thousands more Australians as larger jets service more regional airports, but those airports still struggle to deliver the necessary infrastructure.
Long haul, low cost carriers are looking for opportunities in Australia that would be a great boost to our tourism industry.
Great advances in aircraft technology and types are creating challenges and opportunities that must be tapped – not just the large passenger jets, but the emerging air taxi and business jet market using very light jets and highly efficient modern business piston engine craft.
The Howard Government has not prepared for the future. They have no plan to harvest these opportunities.
During the first twelve months in office, a Rudd Labor Government will work with the aviation industry to develop an national plan – Australia’s Future Aviation Plan.
A NATIONAL AVIATION PLAN
The Australia’s Future Aviation Plan will set a framework for Australian aviation for the next 20 years and include the following elements:
1. Future growth and capability gaps -
A detailed analysis of future passenger, movement and freight growth is required, including an expose of any policy or regulatory barriers and capability gaps threatening the achievement of that growth.
2. An integrated approach to redressing capability gaps –
The plan will integrate all sectors of the aviation industry. The industry has been fragmented. To meet the requirements of future growth in air travel, all sectors have a role to play.
3. World leader in aviation training –
There is a significant unrealised export earning potential in our region for provision of pilot, maintenance engineering, air traffic control, aviation fire fighting and airport operations training.
The plan will give primary focus to options to redress the current skill gap for Australia’s growth, but will also include a strategy to grow Australia’s aviation training export earnings and reputation of Australian training organisations.
4. A more cohesive Government approach, with improved co-ordination across agencies and leveraging opportunities from sharing civilian and defence aviation assets.
5. General Aviation – General aviation is struggling and needs renewal. The partnership between airport owners and general aviation industry needs rebuilding. Privatisation of airports was not intended to result in the damage to this important relationship, but it has caused damage at some airports. Both sides need to work together to prepare for the future.
BUILDING FOR THE FUTURE
Labor will bring the industry together with a cohesive vision for the future.
We can not sustain a future that sees the major carriers draining pilots trained by smaller regional airlines without investing in that training.
General aviation is under threat. The shape of the industry is changing.
The Howard Government’s industry action agenda has been deliberating for too long with no outputs.
Labor will encourage the early release of findings and urgently implement recommendations that will deliver for general aviation.
KEEPING IT CLEAN
Australia must take a sensible approach to reducing aviation’s impact on the environment and avoid solutions – such as those applied in Europe - that impose more costs on industry and the travelling public.
With current growth predictions and our reliance on aviation, Australia has to be a leader in creative solutions.
A significant reduction in emissions can be achieved through improved aircraft and navigation technologies and improved air traffic management.
As the jet fleet is renewed for quieter and more fuel efficient aircraft, industry is playing a role.
Airservices Australia has done a lot to improve air traffic management techniques and introduced a range of new measures to reduce fuel burn.
But more can be done.
Labor will challenge Airservices Australia to improve its practices and become a world leader in emissions friendly air traffic management practices.
This will include the development and reporting of indicators that enable measurement and tracking of aviation emissions and the effect of improved air traffic management practices.
MAKING IT EFFICIENT
An important part of preparing for the future is reducing the amount of delay and congestion in the aviation network.
Labor will also require airlines, airports and Airservices to work together to share information and monitor and reduce the cost of delay and congestion in our national aviation network, especially on the major interstate sectors.
KEEPING IT SAFE
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has not responded well to governance changes introduced by the Howard Government.
Labor enabled bi-partisan support for those changes, but they have clearly not improved the level of public accountability or regulatory outcomes.
The Howard Government has conceded all is not well - recently acting on the Queensland Coroner’s advice to conduct an external review of the relationship between the safety regulator (CASA) and the accident investigator (ATSB).
But this review does not go far enough.
Labor will appoint a small management Board and provide it with full delegation to manage the safety regulator. It will be a competent, professional board with the respect of Government, the community, business and the aviation industry.
It is not only the governance structure that has to change at CASA, but also its roles, responsibilities and culture.
Labor will separate the policy and regulatory reform function from that of compliance and enforcement.
There is a role for industry stakeholders in the first, but not in the second.
Regulatory reform and modernisation must be a priority for CASA.
AIRSERVICES
The previous Labor Government established Airservices and CASA as the first step toward separation of the regulatory functions from the air navigation service provision functions.
After twelve years, the Howard Government finally completed another important step when the airspace regulatory functions were removed from Airservices. But some environment regulatory functions still remain in Airservices.
Labor will ensure that all regulatory functions are removed from Airservices.
Airservices is playing an important leadership role in the improvement of aviation safety in our region. This is an important neighbourly role, but also an important function for Australian travellers.
For ten years, the Howard Government has dithered on the introduction of competition for aviation fire fighting and control tower services. After ten years of policy flapping and indecision, they refuse to concede that the policy is wrong.
Labor will not contract out aviation fire fighting or control tower services, but will require Airservices to demonstrate efficiencies to reduce the cost of these services to industry.
The cost of safety services must not be a barrier to their introduction, so it is critical that Airservices improves the efficiency of its service delivery while improving safety outcomes.
Labor will not privatise Airservices.
NETWORK CHARGING
Labor will not permit Airservices to return to location specific charging that leads to prohibitive cost imposts on regional Australians.
Airservices must work with airlines and airports to ensure that any new charging arrangements do not disadvantage regional Australia, ensure adequate returns to cover innovation and investment in new technologies and deliver a healthy return to the Australian Government.
AIRSPACE REFORM
The Howard Government has allowed airspace management to become politicised and captured by personal agendas of powerful individuals.
This will not continue under Labor.
The Office of Airspace Regulation, in consultation with Airservices Australia, will review the Australian Air Traffic Management Plan and remove aspects of the National Airspace System (NAS) that are not appropriate for Australia.
Labor will withdraw the Howard Government’s unnecessary radar direction. That direction issued to Airservices would impose unjustifiable costs on industry and had no safety or business case rationale.
INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE IN GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Both the aviation industry and the bureaucracy could benefit from an active exchange of information and ideas.
Labor will investigate options for a two way secondments or exchanges program designed to enhance industry knowledge in the Department and improve decision making.
INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES
International aviation is critical to the Australian economy and our participation in the world.
Air Service Agreements must be used to maximise the return for Australia as a nation, not for individual airports.
Labor will ensure that jobs and opportunities for the Australian airline industry are accorded highest priority when negotiating these bilateral agreements on a country to country basis.
AIRPORTS ACT
Labor will ensure that airports consult State and Local governments in relation to airport developments.
Labor will designate an Airport Development and Aviation Noise Ombudsman to receive complaints in relation to aircraft noise and development in populated areas and serve as a point of liaison with the Minister on these matters.
apacau is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 03:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wHAT A WHole load of complete utter waful!
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 04:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: sydney,NSW
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
See here http://www.liberal.org.au/about/documents/Aviation.pdf for Liberal's Statement on Aviation 2007
vans is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 06:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote "My correspondence with Rudd has confirmed that it is Labor party policy to impose a curfew on BNE airport - how backward is that."

Sounds like a good idea to me. I really don't like 4am reports.

Daylight saving would be a better option though- as much as I don't like it we still have to work to it.

Just my thoughts...
virgindriver is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 06:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 684
Received 81 Likes on 25 Posts
Unhappy What to do?

Thanks vans........

On p.17 in the document you've referred, the Coalition is claiming that:
During Labor’s time in office, the CAA had four Chairmen, four Chief Executives and seven safety regulation heads.
I'd have to say that I don't reckon that it's done so well under the coalition either!

After reading both of the policies, I'm still really at a loss to decide which 'contestant' will do best for Aviation!
SIUYA is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 07:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: sydney,NSW
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And also from this report:-
A key part of meeting these goals was the Coalition Government’s
introduction of the Aviation Regulation Review Taskforce, established
to undertake the Civil Aviation Safety Authority’s regulatory reform
programme.
The Taskforce is scheduled to provide a formal report and
recommendations to the Minister by December 2007.
A re-elected Coalition Government will complete the Civil Aviation
Safety Authority’s regulatory reform programme
The Aviation Regulatory Reform Programme has now been going for nearly 10 years and has been well covered in another thread. Notice that the Coalition say that they will complete the programme, but once again the time frame for completion is missing. Why am I not surprised?
See here For the Regulatory Reform Programme Will Drift Along Forever
vans is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 08:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mumbles Fersun

Now, if any of you jet jocks believe that load of krap old Mumbles, who, incidentally, is Charlie Jones reincarnated as he hates jet jocks, if you believe that stuff about "aviation being the lifeblood........", you sure deserve what you're gonna get IF the Dudd wins. Y'know, I remember a F/O who voted for Squawk in '83, 'cos he reckoned "Squawk will be wonderful for the country". A few years later as he pad the long and winding paths looking for employment, I often wondered if he remembered the folly of his wasted vote. I'll bet he did. In fact, I know he did.
From the threads in D & G, seems there are quite a few like him out there. Don't worry - I'm OK - Jacks and Jills. I'll just sit back and have a chuckle.
Spaz Modic is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 09:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
11 years ago.

How much for a medical?
How much for landing fees?
Airspace fees?
Flightservice/watch?
How much for an ASIC?
Did we have to go thru security?
How many Towers?
Taxes for pax?
Were we more or less of a target for terrorists?

and finally.......

How much were we paid and how much did an average house cost?

It's hardley rocket science kids.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2007, 13:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Down there
Posts: 315
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Thumbs down Neither party gives a toss about aviation

I'll never forgive the Coalition for helping to fcuk the GA industry in the Sydney basin by selling off all 3 airports to the one conglomerate - of which part is a developer, resulting in the closure of YHOX in Oct 08 and the resultant price gouging at YSBK & YSCN. They will never get my vote for this despicable decision.

This does not mean that I will vote for Labor either.

JT
Jenna Talia is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 01:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was all about selling off the silverware to then boast about surplus'. And now the big spending spree as the ship sinks.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 05:29
  #14 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,418
Received 199 Likes on 111 Posts
SIUYA. If my memory serves me correctly, in the past twelve years or so there has been only three CASA Directors: Leroy Keith, Mick Toller and the present incumbent.
tail wheel is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 05:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 684
Received 81 Likes on 25 Posts
Thanks tail wheel.............

The news has just indicated that the election appears to be a 'cliffhanger', but that Labor seems to be leading in the polls. Despite that, my comment of yesterday:

After reading both of the policies, I'm still really at a loss to decide which 'contestant' will do best for Aviation!
still stands I'm afraid.

I also think that despite my, ahem, apparent mistake about 'turnover' level in CASA (which you have alluded to) vans is correct, and if the Coalition is returned, then the:

Regulatory Reform Programme Will Drift Along Forever
Oh, there's just one more thing! It's a reminder to you if you accidentally reply to this post, you will die painfully and instantly!
SIUYA is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 07:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I have to tell you...Labor has won! As of half an hour ago!

Unfortunately, the trend is obvious!
amos2 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 07:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 24 27 45.66N 54 22 42.28E
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The experts on ninemsn and abc.net.au won't call it but all the numbers say Labor has romped it in. It even looks like little Johnny is gonna get beaten in his own seat.

Thank god Aussies have seen sense finally.
AirNoServicesAustralia is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 08:50
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly it appears so.
I think you will find this is the main reason............
His Labor successor as premier, Anna Bligh, said there had been a particularly strong response from young voters at the polling booths in the Brisbane seats of Ryan and Moreton.
"There was a very noticably high level of interest from young voters for the Labor how-to-vote cards," Ms Bligh told reporters at the main Labor function in Brisbane.
"There was a very high recognition of the Kevin07 campaign and young voters just walking in and saying 'Kevin07'.
"I have to say it's been a long time since I have seen particularly young voters respond to Labor that way.''
The trouble is so many young people voting today do not remember what it was like the last time Labor were in power.
airsupport is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 09:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Suitcase
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets not let this thread denigrate into a post-election bitch session. Why not really have a good hard look at what the next federal government will do for Australian aviation policies as a whole.

So we have had a change of government. Big deal. The sky won't fall in. Lets focus on the issues.

WynSock is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2007, 10:10
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bye John.:d:d:d:d:d
Mr. Hat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.