Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Another profit upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jun 2007, 00:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where I'm not alarmed
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another profit upgrade

This article was published in todays Sydney Morning Herald. The rat is now smellier than ever yet ASIC appears to be sitting on its hands when it comes to asking questions about the APA bid and the Qantas Board and Management behaviour. One must assume that bottles of Grange given to politicians and flight upgrades are not given to them are not done for nothing, putting aside Chairmans Lounge membership etc etc!

Qantas has its reasons for hiding light under bushel


Elizabeth Knight
June 28, 2007

AS QANTAS boss Geoff Dixon continued his French mini-break following his attendance at James Packer's wedding last week, he left his loyal lieutenant and finance head Peter Gregg to craft a statement in the most obscure and understated way to let only the most astute reader know that the company's profit was going to be bigger than previous company indications.

Yes, an upward profit revision. But getting Qantas to tell the market that its results are more positive than previously expected is like pulling teeth.

As readers will be aware, just about every other listed company in Australia delights in the prospect of being able to deliver positive news. However, for Qantas, it is never that simple.

Indeed, one of the great criticisms that investors have had of Qantas is that it has always been working several agendas when it comes to letting the market understand its prospects.

Those institutional shareholders that refused to accept the private equity bid for the airline argued that one of the reasons the Qantas share price lagged its real value was that the management massaged profit expectations down or, at the very least, underplayed the upside.

Traditionally, this has been because Dixon was busy walking a very fine line. For years he has been managing the industrial relations and public relations situation.

In order that he could take costs out of the business he has needed to renegotiate with the various and largely unionised workers. In doing so he played the "profits under threat" card on a regular basis when it came to renegotiating salaries and conditions - and this continues.

Qantas's other agenda has long been its attempts to lift foreign ownership restrictions imposed by the Government. While this continues to be something of a lost cause, Dixon is always aware that removal of these ownership barriers will enhance the company's share price and reduce its cost of capital.

More recently, Dixon has had even more reason for downplaying the earnings prospects. The private equity consortium's bid for Qantas was supported by the board and management but ultimately rejected by shareholders. In order to put weight behind the bid, Qantas management continued to caution about the risks to earnings, the most immediate of which was the threat of Singapore's Tiger Airways entering the Australian domestic market.

(It's worth mentioning that there are mixed messages about this from within Qantas. At a Press Club function earlier this month, Jetstar boss Alan Joyce laughed off the threat imposed by Tiger, suggesting the Asian newcomer was already bleeding millions of dollars.)

During the period that the private equity bid was active, Qantas had to reluctantly upgrade its earnings twice, putting pressure on the bid's prospects for success and exposing the board and management as attempting to sell the company too cheaply.

Having yet another profit upgrade so soon after the bid was unsuccessful is yet further evidence that Qantas had been seriously undervalued.

Thus it would have given management no joy yesterday to have to admit that its 2007 earnings prospects were even better than they had reluctantly indicated only a few months ago.

It seems, however, that analysts were not about to fall for this management assessment again. Following the lapse of the bid, many stockbroking analysts revised their numbers up for 2007. This left Qantas in the position of having to confirm these broker revisions or look like they had left the rest of the market insufficiently informed.

Qantas took the appropriate move and got on board to let everyone know that the broker upgrades were on target. Of course, Qantas didn't make it obvious: the news was tagged on to the last paragraph of an unrelated statement about selling its small shareholding in Air New Zealand.

Nor has the company been too forthcoming about who might be joining its board following the vacancies created following the departure of chairman Margaret Jackson and fellow director James Packer.

The board meets on July 18 and this could result in some clarity. Following the decision by QIC chairman Trevor Rowe to decline his invitation, the betting has moved back to James Strong as the new chairman.
B A Lert is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 00:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stralya
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is it in black and white,

"walking the fine line between industrial and public relations".....

Is that not misleading the market?

Wake up ASIC!!!

p.s see my other thread titled the truth about Dixon, Macquarie and son of kerry.........
QFinsider is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 00:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Earth
Age: 52
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regardless of which side of that line you sit on, and at times you may be on either side orstraddling it, you have to give it to them. They have done an exceptionally good job of treading the thin line!!!

SQ
squawk6969 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 01:07
  #4 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"walking the fine line between industrial and public relations".....

Darth may find out that this is a bit like Joh's old saying of...

"This is like walking both sides of a barbed wire fence".....(at the same time he meant)
lowerlobe is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 05:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on how long your legs are I suppose!
max autobrakes is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 05:37
  #6 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Ultimate Crew Rest....
Age: 69
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From max autobrakes....... "Depends on how long your legs are I suppose"

The other contributing factor is ....How cold it is (is it spanner weather) ..?
lowerlobe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.