Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air NZ to get A319's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 08:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air NZ to get A319's?

Heard a rumour at a breifing today that management are looking at replacing 737's with A319's.
Anyone else heard something like that?
CTOT ON is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 08:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: house
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please............ and the sooner the better!
terronnd is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 08:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ppppppppppppppppppppffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttt.


How are they going to pay for it? with the Ansett money they stole????
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 09:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crew Bunk
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a load of rubbish. Ansett was headed down the tubes with or with out ANZ.
747-419 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 09:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Load of rubbish? pppppppppfffffffffffffffffffffffttttttttt go and read the creditors reports and find how much they 'stole'

yes Ansett was heading down the gutter i agree but what Air New Zealand did was totally un - acceptable./
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 09:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh my god, let it go already!!!

CTOT ON

That's interesting. The word has always been that they'll get NG Boeings somewhere round 2011, but I'm not sure how reliable that one is either.

The 319 would certainly be a good machine for the domestic market if they can sort out the loading hastles they have with A320s on the domestic runs. Other airlines seem to be able to do it so I'd imagine it's just a slight infrastructure change?
Cloud Cutter is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 10:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cloud mate.....loading hassels????.......explain....just curious really.....fly both the 320/319.....never really experienced loading hassels.....PB
pakeha-boy is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 10:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Is cos vee arrre freench..an say noon

Plus I think AirNZ (I stand to be corrected) have a few issues with their set up being Boeing based rather than tolouse inspired.

BTW you have to try Tolouse sausage...food of the gods
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 10:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Next to Bay 8
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've noticed that NZ previously used ULDs (AKH - baby cans) in the loading of their A320s, now I've been seeing a mix of both bulk load and ULDs being used... perhaps that may have something to do with the loading problems mentioned??? Anyone?
OhForSure is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 10:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PB, I'll give it a go but I'm not really sure my self. Something to do with the cans, and how the bags can't be accessed at the aircraft for tranships. Does that make any sense? Perhaps someone else could help me out. All I know is I've been delayed waiting for bags off A320s (filling in for 73s) and that was the reason given.
Cloud Cutter is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 10:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
H1....oui oui.......prefer the "le pipe' from the sheilias from the San Micheal Blvd
pakeha-boy is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 10:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cloud.....more confused really.......we run 321/320/319....757/737 ops all from the same gates......and its a daily routine......reckon it depends on how much $$$$$$ you want to throw at the operation side of things....PB
pakeha-boy is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 12:39
  #13 (permalink)  
CT7
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Anywhere I want
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, apparently Mr Airbus was out last week to hand out gifts and try to sway Air NZ.
2 Shows, none and you know the other!
Air NZ recently did the math (unlike selwyn cushing!) and the 737s will be staying. And I believe getting a well earned refurb.

Comment re cans and thrown bags, Cans for Air NZ flights and throw it in for Freedom maybe?
CT7 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 19:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: At work
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concur with CT7. The 733's will be flying the line domestically until c 2015 when the 73 replacement comes out. Then Air NZ will put their hat in the ring (just like almost every other 73 operator around the world) for some delivery slots.

As an aside, with Le Bus, is there such a thing as a high cycle penalty with respect to airframe and engine overhaul costs etc?
belowMDA is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2007, 19:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: house
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
319's are being looked at but it's not a formal fleet replacement program yet.

Airbus are pushing it hard.

A320 considerably cheaper to maintain than 737.

Serious advantage to having same a/c type operating domestic and trans tasman, one pilot group, one flight attendant group, one sim, fit a/c to route, ie 319 to provincial cities etc.

NZ = Cans, SJ = Bulk.
terronnd is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2007, 09:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of MEL we bulkload SJ A320 flights that are operated by NZ livered aircraft. NZ flights are still containerised.
MELKBQF is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2007, 08:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the difference? I'm guessing freight?
Cloud Cutter is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2007, 08:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Dog Box
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The pencil will have to be very sharp for the company to consider them as I believe they have not budgeted to change the domestic fleet for a little while yet... Also there is the issue of the 319 being heavier than the domestic weight -300, this pushes it into the next weight bracket for landing fees and so it would have to be a lot cheaper to run...
Split Flap is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2007, 10:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: suitcase
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cloud Cutter

The only reason Freedom flights are not can loaded is most Freedom flights operate into Dunedin, Hamilton and Palmerston North which do not have the equipment to load / unload containers.

Also why you see Freedom flights operating in Air NZ livery and vice versa is because the A320 pilot group operate as one under Zeal 320 which is a combination of both Air NZ and Freedom A320 pilots. Therefore you may fly an Air NZ service one day and a Freedom service the next.

Believe me it's a complete dogs breakfast and either pilot group likes it.
grdproxinop is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2007, 13:02
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 2 bob's worth is that cans and narrow bodies do not work.

TN tried it with cans in the 727-276 a thousand years ago and it was a nightmare. 737/757 belly sections are much the same as the fuselage dimension is the same. A319/320/321 are only slightly wider.

Stick in ULD's and you limit your ability to carry abnormal length baggage/freight eliminating sporting equipment in many cases and long cargo.

There is also the weight penalty of the ULD itself. No bulk hold in a single aisle aeroplane.

This one must have been introduced by Maaaaaaahketing.

Best all

EWL
Eastwest Loco is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.