Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

perth qantas engineering

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Mar 2007, 22:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near LGW
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A "Health and Safety issue" as we would say in Pomland ..
yachtno1 is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2007, 22:42
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West of The East
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"i ASSSUME YOU'RE ARE A PILOT?
I NEVER SEE YOU GUYS WORKING ALONE, YOU CAN'T EVEN MAKE IT TO THE AEROPLANE ON TIME WITHOUTHALF THE COMPANY HELPING TO GET YOU THERE."
Huh! As a pilot, I am curious as to what this statement means? I walk through the terminal, and I walk on to the aircraft. Nobody escorts me, nobody pulls any strings for me, I line up at security, just like everyone else. I'm would not despute that there are lots of people helping me get the aircraft away on time, but nobody helps me get to the aircraft. Maybe your words were wrong, but mate, what have you got against pilots?
I'm Driving is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 01:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apology

Apology to all, that was my first reply, and not proud of it.
No Sar No details somehow pressed my button with his "Soooo is it a safety issue" , and now all of a sudden he seems to agree that it is ? ? ? ?
In the passed 6 months we have had several serious injuries to engineers working alone on the ramp, it is a very dangerous work environment.
In over 20 years of turnarounds overall I find pilots very ignorant to what goes on b4 they get to the aircraft, hence my comment to No Sars that he must be a pilot. Apologies to all for that comment.
donagin is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 01:21
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Donagin, you need to put my post into context.
No SAR No Details is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 02:39
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Context?

What is it you don't understand No Sars?
donagin is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 08:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not me that doesn't understand.
The issue IS about safety.
Other posters dragged it into being an industrial dispute.
Others then tried to seperate it into white collar/blue collar debate.
I then put it back on the agenda as being a safety issue.
YOU then took the wrong end of the stick and gave it a good shake.
That is why I said put my post into context.
No SAR No Details is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 11:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the new corporate mission statement at Qantas was
"Profitability ,before Safety, before Schedule!"
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 19:17
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Safety

G'day No SARS
I think we all know there is a lot going on in Perth, and safety is just one issue, and a very important one at that.
Brgds
donagin is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 21:55
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
I dont have a collar let alone a coloured collar, I think its pathetic...
I am a pilot in QF and I really believe there is a problem with idiots srewing their hard workers down to the minimum, No matter what anyone thinks, Engineers are the backbone of QF, yeah I might be a shin bone but hey thats not going to support all the weight?? Engineers are the backbone, lets face it, its a fact. I am very concerned about the dramas with the engineering staff, after all they are what makes QF such a safe airline. I am really concerned when issues such as this come up. PH engineers should voice their right, especially when safety is an issue!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 05:16
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation It's Pathetic

Well said A of A QF Engineering is run by accountants who have no idea about aircraft maintenance. They are all just bean counters who have cut the guts out of engineering.
If there was an alternative MRO in Oz QF would be losing engineers in droves.
We all try to be professional, but nobody gives a sh#t anymore. Morale is thru the floor.
As is the case with most departments we have endured years of EBA's that don't keep up with the CPI, while QF wastes millions on Strategy maps, Part Smart and eQ computer programs which are all dismal failures.
Engineering management have no ideas so they ask the troops to self shaft themselves, and when they refuse you get what has happened in Perth and now Melbourne.
God help us all
donagin is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 09:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And apparently the Sydney precinct review is going to be scrapped.
How much did it cost to get the consultants in from england to oversee that project?
No SAR No Details is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 09:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Age: 53
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really, scrapped. Heard only last week that redundancies were to be offered in April to get 200 LAME's to go for the merging etc. to happen.
Syd eng is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 11:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a co incidence!!

Yesterday I got an email from resume.domain who were advertising for "Heavy Jet LAMES" around December 2007.

The reply was:

" Re your application for the Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer roles.

Our client has advised us that at this stage their contract has been postponed indefinately, should these circumstances change we will be sure to be in touch.

Thank you for application and your patience, we trust and hope that you understand that this is beyond our control. "

It looks like QF LAMES get a reprieve until they can concoct their next cost cutting masterplan.

Good luck all!!
numbskull is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2007, 12:02
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your mind
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas Engineering

I say give them nothing. Don't negotiate. Let the so called expert management sort everything out. We all know they aren't worth a pinch of **** They have no idea and are hopong engineers will sort it out as they always do. It's time they took responsibility for there actions and fall on there swords. If 'M' and 'D.C.' think they can fcuk with the engineering grouop they have another thing coming. Will c u
hannibal lector is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 00:04
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard about the roster issues going on in Perth and Melbourne and I extend my thanks to the LAMEs there for sticking to their guns. I hope some genuine negotiation will result from your efforts.

Could someone provide further information about the Sydney precinct review? I have not heard about it before.

Thanks
fantasyland is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 09:00
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
these layoffs will they be forced i cant see them getting 200 to leave after the last redunancy was less than a year ago
domo is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 19:24
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the QF engineer the only person on duty at the 24 hour airport, surely not.

Are we saying that only another QF engineer contactable by radio can come to assist in case of emergency, surely not.

Why not give the engineer a mobile phone instead of a radio?

There must be a stack of appropriate people to contact in case of emergency, including the 24 hour Rescue Fire Fighting Service.

Jeepers this works in small ports, what is different about Perth?

Seems a no-brainer to me.

Or is it just another attempt to squawk safety during a reform process??????
Managers Perspective is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 22:27
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Delhi
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not give the engineer a mobile phone instead of a radio?

Because any PED (portable electronic device) needs to be intrinsically safe in accordance with Australian safety standards. Mobile phones are not. If you drop one and the battery falls off on the concrete tarmac, a spark could occur igniting fuel vapours which tend to hang around the vents at the end of the wings. This would tend to cause an explosion that could lead to the deaths of hundreds of people.

I thought this would be a no brainer but then again as most managers are now accountants it may be a little difficult to work out.



Are we saying that only another QF engineer contactable by radio can come to assist in case of emergency, surely not.

If an emergency occurs Qantas procedures need to be followed. The procedures are for the DMM to respond to the appropriate emergency service as outlined in his office on emergency response cards. If it is left to anyone to respond then other depts and engineers may just assume that someone else will get it.

I would think it a no brainer that Qantas procedures need to be followed in case of emergency but then again accountants sit in offices. FYI - If you get a paper cut please follow procedure and contact your on duty first aider.



Or is it just another attempt to squawk safety during a reform process??????

It is an attempt to bypass safety during a reform process. A process driven by pen pushers and other odd balls to cut costs and reduce safety. A process driven by a Qantas management team littered with ex Ansett managers applying the same principles that destroyed Ansett. A process that is being rejected by Perth engineers for the benefit of all engineers in Australia and the safety record of the airline but thank you for your perspective. It gives us an insight into the ignorance we are dealing with.
mahatmacoat is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2007, 23:59
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: R1P
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks MAHAT...

Right to the point. These are the incursions to the safety and work procedures that the "bonus" driven management are slowly feeding into the system. They may sound trivial to the uneducated or ignorant, but where does it stop. Do we wait for the disaster to happen, or ensure the safety of Qantas employees and the flying public is held as a priority. All part of the grand scheme to cheapen Qantas and ensure managment get their bonus, which unfortunately filters right down to the lowest KPI driven office bunny with clipboard and calculator skills. It's GD's favourite message, "You do not meet cost of capital".
radiation junkie is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2007, 05:29
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Managers Perspective

It's a bit hard to use a radio or a mobile if your alone, injured ,and unconscious on the tarmac.Hence the need to work in pairs, we wouldn't want an LTI would we, coz safety is our priority.
It is my experience of late that all staff are out of the office and spread thinly around the ramp, even the senior is out of the office just to make things work.
Stick to shuffling papers!
QF22 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.