Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Australia favours Virgin Blue on US routes: analysts

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Australia favours Virgin Blue on US routes: analysts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2004, 20:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Townsville,Nth Queensland
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Australia favours Virgin Blue on US routes: analysts

Mon "Business Times" (Singapore)

Australia favours Virgin Blue on US routes: analysts

SIA, Emirates may not get approval to extend services to Sydney, Melbourne

(MELBOURNE) Australia's government, facing a general election this year, may favour the nation's second-largest carrier Virgin Blue Holdings Ltd when it comes to awarding permission for lucrative flights to the US, analysts said.

Singapore Airlines Ltd (SIA) and Emirates, seeking the Australian government's permission to pick up passengers in Sydney or Melbourne before flying to the US from Singapore and Dubai, may not get the access, said Credit Suisse First Boston's analysts Greg Ward and Anthony Moulder.

Merrill Lynch & Co's transport analysts Simon Gresham and Trent Barnett agreed.

A Virgin Blue service to the US 'will reduce the possibility the government will provide SIA and Emirates access to the Australia-US route in the medium term,' Mr Ward and Mr Moulder wrote in a report last week.

At stake is a flight route that last year generated for Australia's biggest carrier Qantas Airways Ltd more than A$1.5 billion (S$1.8 billion) in sales with more than 25 per cent profit margin, one of the most profitable services. Virgin Blue, which grabbed a third of Australia's domestic air-travel market in four years, wants to fly to the US West Coast to compete with Qantas.

SIA and Emirates, which already fly to the US from Singapore and Dubai, want to extend their services to Sydney and Melbourne so they can serve business travellers and tourists from Australia and New Zealand.

The government of Australian Prime Minister John Howard, whose term ends in April 2005, is due to hold an election in the second half of this year.

Air rights are negotiated between governments. Virgin Blue hasn't filed an application for the US route with the Australian government's International Air Services Commission, which allocates the air rights. Any Australia-US service offered by Virgin Blue would have to offer a minimum three flights a week to obtain the rights.

Singapore's government, which owns SIA, has asked Australia to let Asia's most profitable carrier extend its Singapore-US route to Australia to help it get an edge over budget carriers. The carrier can't fly to the US directly from Australia.

Emirates, owned by the government of Dubai, flies twice daily to Sydney and Melbourne from the United Arab Emirates. The carrier, which flies to New York on a separate service from Dubai, is not seeking to fly directly to the US from Australia, said spokesman Mike Simon in Brisbane.

A new entrant on the Australia-US service could fly with costs 20 per cent to 30 per cent lower than Qantas and be able to offer cheaper fares, Merrill's Mr Gresham and Mr Barnett said. 'We believe this is a market that could grow substantially through price stimulation,' they told clients. - Bloomberg

=======================================
Wirraway is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2004, 22:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thoughts of Virgin operating across the Pacific and into the US will be keeping a few Qantas people up late into the night.

One concern I guess will be the effect on the intended operation of the A380s because I imagine Virgin will be considering high frequency operations as one method of competition on the route?

Last edited by Lodown; 13th Jul 2004 at 01:45.
Lodown is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2004, 22:57
  #3 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,475
Received 100 Likes on 57 Posts
They better hurry up & get that ETOPS sorted out!!!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 00:52
  #4 (permalink)  
Props are for boats!
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Buster if they buy some used 747-400s who needs ETOPS?
Pfcourse if they havent applied for it then its still pie in the sky stuff. They need to get their plans in order. Id go 747-400S first asa test then maybe go the Bus it its s sucess.

Sheep
Sheep Guts is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 02:01
  #5 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,475
Received 100 Likes on 57 Posts
Would they get a widebody "tick" on their AOC if they haven't got ETOPS for the narrow bodies? I guess CASA is like any other Govt. Dept...pay yer fees & "she'll be right!"
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 07:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aust
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You must remember guys that CASA did not suspend VB's ETOPS approval. VB voluntarily suspended it themselves. It had nothing to do with CASA.
Bugsmasha is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 07:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite correct Bugsmasha. But let's put it another way. What would CASA have done if they didn't hand in the ETOPS approval?
Z Force is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 07:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: downunder
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dry or wetlease aircraft from virgin atlantic or even sq. dji could end up operating on the route fairly quickly. you would need 1 aircraft for 3pw, 2 a/c for dailyish depending on where maintenance is done.
gameboy1971 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 11:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pardon my ignorance if this is an obvious question,
But what exact is a 'dry' and 'wet' lease?
is it just another term for short or long term lease?

Cheers
On The Horizon is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2004, 11:47
  #10 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,475
Received 100 Likes on 57 Posts
A dry lease is when you get an aircraft from the desert. A wet lease is one from the tropics....



Dry..aircraft without crews.
Wet..aircraft with crews.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2004, 09:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: downunder
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could run it as a damp lease (Tech crew only) - knowing Virgin they will call it a moist lease
gameboy1971 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.