PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   Line Up And Wait (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/216276-line-up-wait.html)

Bern Oulli 17th March 2006 13:02

D with B, obviously a boring lunch hour.

Sector 7G 17th March 2006 15:22

cantfullypark! thankyou so much for the reply. Its good to know that this wasn't a standard clearance. We must have misconstrued the response by the controller. It just concerned me as I was flying and if it had been Cat 1 weather I would've pressed the TOGA switches.

Thanks again.

CAP493 17th March 2006 17:54


Originally Posted by Dances with Boffins
I love happy endings.
Anyone says that Proon is just for management bashing, please direct them to this thread:ok:

Hear hear! Well done to all involved.
:ok: :)

yonash 29th March 2006 05:58

From another point of view.

Warsaw airport is getting more busy, so we observe different responses to our commands.
We've started using 2 RWY for dep, single for arrival (we have no parallel rwy, just the crossing).
See: most of the time we are using one rwy (29) for deps, another (33) for arr. What concerns pilots is, when the line-up is given for rwy 29, and the clrd to land rwy 33 was given before. There's much more concern with that situation (different rwys !), than during situtation, when RWY 33 is used for both deps and arrs, and rwy 29 is used for departures only, and "line-up behind arriving" was issued.

Tarq57 29th March 2006 07:39

Yonash,
I guess a way to improve situational awareness of all concerned would be to include the runway in any clearance involving same.eg: "XXX line up RWY 29 and wait"
I believe this is an ICAO phraseology; the runway should be included where there is any possibility of confusion.
Some airlines make this SOP, to always read back the runway for TO or landing clearance.
Noticeable in my patch of dirt, coz there is only one runway.

yonash 29th March 2006 08:45

Sure.You're right, it was just my way to shorten the message.

Situation goes like this:

- atc: rwy 33 clrd to land
- pil: we're cleared to land

- atc: line-up rwy 29 and wait
- pil: confirm line-up ?
- atc: affirm, line-up rwy 29, the arrival traffic is for rwy 33
- pil: lining-up.

- atc: behind landing a319 line-up rwy 33 behind and wait.
pilot readbacks correctly with no confusion.

That's the point - I don't know why, it's been more confusing to line-up another rwy (we almost ever use rwy designator), than the same as departure.

Tarq57 29th March 2006 11:29

Is it my imagination, or is what was once straightforward and logical now complex and worrisome?:confused:

yonash 29th March 2006 18:10

imagination, for sure :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:47.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.