NATS Unit Banding
Dear NATS Colleagues, please cast your minds back to when NATS went through the exercise of placing Units into the various Bands that we have now. Obviously traffic movements was one driver, but how about complexity? How was this determined? Was there much fine tuning of the Bands after they were first established. Many thanks for any input.
|
As far as I remember complexity was taken into account, but it wasn't done brilliantly IMHO. So many things have changed, such as things like remote holding, EOBTs etc, which have made some tower units so much more complex since the banding was introduced. Once established there was no tuning at all.
Quite honestly it is overdue for an overhaul. |
Unfair to ask NATS ATCOs to share commercial information (your profile suggests you may be freelance) that could lead to them getting into bother due to (normal)company social media policies …. Suggest you ask Prospect if you’re a member as they may have been involved in developing any pay / remuneration agreements. RT
|
Originally Posted by ATCO Two
(Post 11117467)
Dear NATS Colleagues, please cast your minds back to when NATS went through the exercise of placing Units into the various Bands that we have now. Obviously traffic movements was one driver, but how about complexity? How was this determined? Was there much fine tuning of the Bands after they were first established. Many thanks for any input.
Our own Prospect rep was horrified when his own views were disregarded in this situation and immediately objected to the findings, only to be told that the decision had been made at a 'higher level than himself and there 'might' be a review after about 5 years. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:04. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.