PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   QHN to STD from uncontrolled to CAS (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/608815-qhn-std-uncontrolled-cas.html)

Frusciante 13th May 2018 19:21

QHN to STD from uncontrolled to CAS
 
Hi.

I am flying IFR in UK, and my instructor told me that during a flight from Cardiff, flying at 5000 feet (so on QNH) when handoff to CAS (to join AirWay) I need to use STD. I do not understand because I am below the TA of Cardiff which is 6000’

any thoughts?

Jules.

chevvron 14th May 2018 23:03

5,000 will be below your cruising level if you are joining CAS, so just do what London ATCC tell you which will probably be 'climb to flight level XXX' or 'cleared to enter at flight level XXX' in which case you obviously switch to STD.

Doody2007 15th May 2018 11:15

Just to try and understand the situation a little more. You were on an IFR flight from Cardiff. Were you still inside the Cardiff control zone or control areas when you were instructed to change to the area frequency?

Or had you left Cardiff's controlled airspace?

Doody2007 15th May 2018 11:55

I've just googled it. Definitely 6000ft TA within Cardiffs controlled airspace. It would be 3000ft outside CAS, hence my question regarding whether or not the OP was inside the Cardiff control area or not.

It's not immediately clear from the first post.

wiggy 15th May 2018 12:35


Originally Posted by chevvron (Post 10146912)
.....just do what London ATCC tell you which will probably be 'climb to flight level XXX' or 'cleared to enter at flight level XXX' in which case you obviously switch to STD.

Exactly.....

chevvron 15th May 2018 16:12


Originally Posted by Doody2007 (Post 10147365)
I've just googled it. Definitely 6000ft TA within Cardiffs controlled airspace. It would be 3000ft outside CAS, hence my question regarding whether or not the OP was inside the Cardiff control area or not.

It's not immediately clear from the first post.

Cardiff ATC have small sections of en-route airway delegated to them at low level as well as their own CTR and CTA.

2 sheds 15th May 2018 19:11


I’ve almost been vectored into the side of a hill at Cardiff while in IMC
Is there a published report, TA? Could you provide a link?

2 s

Doody2007 15th May 2018 19:14


Originally Posted by chevvron (Post 10147538)
Cardiff ATC have small sections of en-route airway delegated to them at low level as well as their own CTR and CTA.

Yes, I'm aware of that.

The Fat Controller 15th May 2018 19:20

When you leave airspace that is using an aerodrome QNH to fly on an adjacent airway, the mimimum cruising level on the airway will be published as a Flight Level, therefore you must change the pressure setting to standard and adjust to the relevant FL as per your clearance.

The minimum usable FL on the airway is determined by a table taking into account the Regional QNH, this ensures terrain separation.

Controllers will issue an appropriate level, just be aware when the pressure is low, your planned FL may not be available

chevvron 15th May 2018 19:53


Originally Posted by TangoAlphad (Post 10147663)


Chevron,

First of all I really respect a lot of the stuff you post so I don’t want to be quoting this out of context, so I will clarify it is simply as the poster appears to be new to IFR ops under training I just want to make a small nitpick.

I’ve almost been vectored into the side of a hill at Cardiff while in IMC so never blindly trust an instruction. Always query and satisfy yourself yup that makes sense.


Were you inside or outside the boundary of the SMAC?

Packer27L 15th May 2018 20:26


Originally Posted by TangoAlphad (Post 10147743)
If i’m Not mistaken is the SMAC the MOD equiv of a Radar vectoring chart? If so then yes. We were which is what prompted me to question the vector as it was taking us below min safe towards terrain.

http://www.ead.eurocontrol.int/eadba...2018-03-29.pdf

Rwy1234 16th May 2018 06:16

Thread Title.
 
QHN?

mods can this be corrected so it can be found at a later date in the search.

chevvron 16th May 2018 12:06


Originally Posted by TangoAlphad (Post 10147743)


If i’m Not mistaken is the SMAC the MOD equiv of a Radar vectoring chart? If so then yes. We were which is what prompted me to question the vector as it was taking us below min safe towards terrain.

The SMAC (Surveillance Minimum Altitude Chart) is what used to be called Radar Vectoring Area (RVA) chart, the name changed about 10 years ago.
The MOD equivalent is derived in an entirely different way or at least was when we last had one at Farnborough which was 16 years ago.

chevvron 16th May 2018 15:49

I think some feather plucker at ICAO decided on the name change as there was a liklihood of some places in the distant future using exclusively ADS instead of radar to provide ATC; probably the same feather plucker who decided 'hectopascals' was a great word to use instead of 'millibars'and that if you only had a single 8.33 frequency in your FIR, then all frequencies (apart from those ending in one decimal place) must be referred to with 6 numbers.:rolleyes:

2 sheds 18th May 2018 18:16


I’ve almost been vectored into the side of a hill at Cardiff while in IMC

It was in a light twin under training and was dealt with via a stern phone call so sadly no report. Looking back maybe not the best way of doing so but hey ho..
TangoAlphad - Are you seriously saying that you were placed, in effect, 1,000 feet below the appropriate safety altitude and no MOR was filed?

2 s


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.