PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   Land without clearance (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/585499-land-without-clearance.html)

slowto280 9th Oct 2016 11:19

Land without clearance
 
Without going into too many specifics: Large international A/P - parallel runways (2), 1 for departures, 1 for arrivals (at the time - arrivals not busy), separate tower freqs., inbound airplane switched to tower as instructed but missed contacting tower. Landed no clearance. For sure crew dropped the ball, but what about tower (no contact)?


Your thoughts? :ouch:

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 9th Oct 2016 11:31

If the inbound could not establish contact with the tower he should have reverted to the previous frequency. Not eminently sensible to land without clearance.

slowto280 9th Oct 2016 11:36

Further explanation - airplane DID NOT attempt to contact tower - as in 'overlooked', 'forgot'.......

gooneydog 9th Oct 2016 11:54

Once landed at EWR without landing clearance it was 3.00am and the approach guy was as surprised as we were that it happened no repercussions ....happily

TowerDog 9th Oct 2016 14:08

Done it once, in the sandbox after an all-nighter, daylight and good viz.
Forgot to switch, no jail time, no nothing.

Daysleeper 9th Oct 2016 14:53

Happens fairly regularly for various reasons. Risk is if ATC think that if no comms then the aircraft will definitely go-around. It might not.

Hotel Tango 9th Oct 2016 16:13

Was in the F/D of BAW B757 at AMS many moons ago when we took off without ATC clearance. Informed by ATC after take-off. Embarrassed apologies to the tower to which he replied, "I was monitoring you and would soon have stopped you if I would have had to". Slightly different scenario since we were of course on the correct frequency. I would assume that in this particular case the TWR would have been monitoring the arrival and, failing to have contact, ensured a clear runway.

kcockayne 9th Oct 2016 19:27

This happened to me with a BEA Viscount at Aberdeen in the 70s. I was on Tower, the BEA was transferred to me by APP at the ADN. I know that it was because the controller (Procedural) was sitting next to me. The pilot did not call me & I was intrigued to see when he would. There was no traffic to affect the a/c, so I didn't say anything & let it run.The pilot landed without a clearance to do so & made its first call to me clearing the r/w. I informed him of what had happened & he apologized. I reassured him that there was no real "incident" involved & safety had not been compromised. My concern was that he had learnt from the situation & would not let it happen again. I did not consider that anything was to be gained, in this case, from an official investigation.

slowto280 10th Oct 2016 09:37

So, in case like this: not intentional, no loss of comm, on proper freq., should / could / would one expect the tower to speak up and try to contact the inbound?


Not trying to place blame, just trying to better understand from a ground perspective.


And no, also not a 'huge deal', no one hurt, nothing damaged, no 'close call' - similar - notified after landing initial call up of 'no clearance.....' Drat!


Again, thanks for inputs!

chevvron 10th Oct 2016 10:55

There's always the possibility the pilot has some sort of problem and a call would distract the crew who are preparing for a 'dodgy' landing so provided safety is not compromised, I tend not to say anything until they actually land

kcockayne 10th Oct 2016 12:49


Originally Posted by slowto280 (Post 9535996)
So, in case like this: not intentional, no loss of comm, on proper freq., should / could / would one expect the tower to speak up and try to contact the inbound?


Not trying to place blame, just trying to better understand from a ground perspective.


And no, also not a 'huge deal', no one hurt, nothing damaged, no 'close call' - similar - notified after landing initial call up of 'no clearance.....' Drat!


Again, thanks for inputs!

Although I did not say anything until after the landing, this was largely due to my curiosity as to what the pilot would do & to see when he would call me. The longer this went on, the more I was reluctant to call him - although I could have, at any time, called him with a landing clearance. I suppose that would have been the more professional thing to do but, as chevvron says, there was the thought that something may have happened on the a/c & "interference" from the ground would have exacerbated the situation. Anyway, I took the view that to say nothing & see what developed was what I would do (as there was no traffic to adversely affect the a/c). As far as I know , "everybody lived happily ever after!" In general, nowadays, I would expect the TWR to attempt to contact the a/c with a landing clearance - if the pilot had not solicited one.

veloo maniam 10th Oct 2016 14:19

Controllers duty to show green lights and make blind transmission to land.period.

kcockayne 10th Oct 2016 14:37


Originally Posted by veloo maniam (Post 9536252)
Controllers duty to show green lights and make blind transmission to land.period.

Fair point.

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 10th Oct 2016 14:52

<<Controllers duty to show green lights>>

I suspect that at many airfields green lights are things of the distant past.

Nimmer 10th Oct 2016 16:51

Green lights!!!! As the large A380 configures itself onto the ILS and the pilots continue to go through their landing checklist, they look out at the large 2 runway international airport, and see approach lights, taxiway lights, runway lights, strobes from taxiing aircraft, beacons flashing on the many ground vehicles moving around, headlights, not to mention street lights as the airport is surrounded by houses, and car headlights on the roads below.

But despite these many distractions our 2 super eagles eyed pilots spot a tiny steady green pin head of a light pointing directly towards them.

I guess we are cleared to land they say!!!!

It's another success story for ATC!!!

ZOOKER 10th Oct 2016 16:52

I wonder whether the ATIS message at EGPF is included 'just in case the aerodrome controller is busy vectoring stuff on the ATM', or is that just me being cynical?
Curious as to why it's included though.

Out Of Trim 10th Oct 2016 16:58

Maybe only at Civilian ones.

Red and Green Aldis lamps and Verey flares still used by the Military! :ok:

good egg 10th Oct 2016 17:12

As a tower controller I would transmit blind, instruct a colleague to use Aldis lamp (however insignificant that might be!) and also contact approach to get him/her to transmit blind the landing clearance. Would also prep the operations dept to have a "follow me" vehicle on standby to lead aircraft to stand.
If runway not usable, for whatever reason, I would consider turning off the runway & approach lights in order to dissuade pilot from landing...
(+transmitting blind, red Aldis lamp, getting approach to transmit blind)

good egg 10th Oct 2016 17:17

Oh, and whilst the Aldis lamp has a lovely little target aiming sight I'm pretty sure it's not pinpoint accurate...you could always ask (if you're really bored!) on approach to get Tower to shine it at you...I'd be quite interested if it is obvious (or not) to you

ZOOKER 10th Oct 2016 17:26

I only ever had to use the Aldis Lamp once during 17 years of Aerodrome Control. Fortunately, someone was standing between me and the window I was aiming through.
"It's not working...You're not going out!" he said.
That was how we found out that the cleaning-lady unplugged both signal-lamps each morning, (after we had checked them at 0600L), to plug little 'Henry' in.
And no-one had noticed for about 2 years!


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:04.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.