Reporting position with transponder on
As a PPL flying VFR during a Zone Transit or MATZ Penetration under a Basic or Traffic Service, and squawking A & C as directed by a Radar LARS provider, why am I usually requested to "report at ....", some position en-route (usually a point(s) close to the airfield).
Why do I need to do that? I rather thought you guys would be keeping an eye on me lest I stray from the straight and narrow.:= Is it so that we can agree that I am where we both think I am.:ok: |
I think it may be as a reminder for the controller who may be extremely busy. See if you can arrange a visit and you'll see what I mean.
|
Under a Basic Service, regardless of squawk, you are not necessarily being monitored on a surveillance device.
|
I would agree with you, HD. Just because the a/c is identified on Radar & receiving a Radar Service does not obviate the necessity in the Radar Controller's view, to get a check at any particular point; for whatever reason he may have.
|
Because radar coverage is seldom 100 percent and others in the vicinity should know where you are.
|
Originally Posted by Sideslipper
(Post 9324995)
As a PPL flying VFR during a Zone Transit or MATZ Penetration under a Basic or Traffic Service, and squawking A & C as directed by a Radar LARS provider, why am I usually requested to "report at ....", some position en-route (usually a point(s) close to the airfield).
Why do I need to do that? I rather thought you guys would be keeping an eye on me lest I stray from the straight and narrow.:= Is it so that we can agree that I am where we both think I am.:ok: |
Dumping points. Simple as that.
Report abeam xxxx or Report crossing xxxx Probably followed by a QSY |
Originally Posted by Bright-Ling
(Post 9327853)
Dumping points. Simple as that.
Report abeam xxxx or Report crossing xxxx Probably followed by a QSY Thread on QSY running in 'Flying Instructors and Examiners'. |
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 9328150)
QSY was removed from CAP 413 phraseology about 20 years ago.(or it could have been 30 years)
Thread on QSY running in 'Flying Instructors and Examiners'. "Dumping points" are the same Jeeeez! |
I used to use 'report crossing the M4' as an excuse to transfer (not QSY) people to Benson.
|
Isn't QSY accepted as a colloquialism?
|
Personally I don't mind, but the CAA object to its use.
|
Sideslipper,
I'm with Kockayne, HD and ATCO Fred. It's often used as an 'attention-getter' for the controller, who may be working over half-a-dozen other a/c. Also, landlines/intercoms will be going too. Just because the frequency is quiet, doesn't mean the workload is low. It's not as easy to arrange as it used to be, but if you haven't done so already, do go and visit ATC........They're all very friendly folk who like chatting with pilots.........Honestly. |
Isn't QSY accepted as a colloquialism? Personally I don't mind, but the CAA object to its use. 2 s |
|
Well that says it all, amateur.
|
Originally Posted by SilentHandover
(Post 9334228)
Well that says it all, amateur.
You just wish you were as cool As me, Bear Grylls ;-) |
Originally Posted by SilentHandover
(Post 9334228)
Well that says it all, amateur.
CQ,CQ,CQ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:49. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.