PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   what would an indirect fatal crash would mean for a controller? (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/535956-what-would-indirect-fatal-crash-would-mean-controller.html)

kikwon 14th Mar 2014 03:12

what would an indirect fatal crash would mean for a controller?
 
If you were controlling an airplane that wasinvolved in a fatal crash, but you were not directly responsible, do you thinkyou would be able to continue working as an air traffic controller? Why or whynot?

what is the written statement(law, regulation) involving such matter?

what does ICAO say about this? what does FAA say about this?

N90-EWR 14th Mar 2014 04:17

If it was not the controller's fault, there is no reason why they wouldn't be allowed to continue to work. I work alongside several controllers that were involved in crashes, and they continued working until retirement. The EWR departure controller that worked one of the 9/11 hijacked aircraft still here.

Captain Charisma 14th Mar 2014 05:03

Perhaps I'm being too wary here, but this doesn't sound like an innocent question. A journo looking for another angle to write about the MH flight perhaps? Especially so when read in conjunction with his other post.

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 14th Mar 2014 08:13

<<If you were controlling an airplane that was involved in a fatal crash, but you were not directly responsible, do you think you would be able to continue working as an air traffic controller? Why or why not?>>

In some cases it can be a relatively straightforward process to determine if a controller was responsible from R/T and radar tapes, etc. If he was not responsible then he returns to duty.

good egg 14th Mar 2014 09:01

Return to duty
 
Would recommend a bit of CISM first...

confused atco 14th Mar 2014 09:50


Perhaps I'm being too wary here, but this doesn't sound like an innocent question. A journo looking for another angle to write about the MH flight perhaps? Especially so when read in conjunction with his other post.
Other post


I think you are correct.

Proceed with caution.

Plazbot 16th Mar 2014 16:37

Bump. Someone trolling or with other motives. All four posts are similarly controversial.

llondel 16th Mar 2014 17:33

I think I'd quote the example of UA232. The Sioux City controller was not in any way responsible for what happened, so why would he be forced out?

As HD said, it's clearly going to be on a case by case basis. Go and read up on aircraft accidents and you'll get a better idea. There's lots of information out there.

N90-EWR 16th Mar 2014 18:57

The Sioux city controller did a fantastic job! He later transferred to N90, and I had the pleasure of working with him for over a decade before he retired. One of the best controllers I've ever met.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.