PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   SRA approach landing clarification (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/357130-sra-approach-landing-clarification.html)

jamestkirk 7th Jan 2009 19:33

SRA approach landing clarification
 
Hello.

When going through the aircraft/ATC terminology section of CAP413 in relation to an SRA app., it states;

That after the controller tells you not to respond to further instructions he/she then gives you landing clearance. CAP413 has no readback to that and the pilot remains silent. In essence just following the hdg/alt instructions. I thought you would read back the landing clearance but it seems to differ on this approach.

Is this true or just a mis-print.

Thanks

tori chelli 8th Jan 2009 11:41

From my distant memory of doing SRAs "terminating less than 2 miles from touchdown", I seem to recall saying "clear to land - acknowledge" which invited a readback for just that one occasion in what was otherwise a one-way communication link.

Don't know that it was official/recommended/approved/etc., just something we did! Vintage ATCO might remember :ok:

Nowadays, I'm only doing 2-milers which of course aren't continuous Tx

Tori
always under pressure

Fox3snapshot 8th Jan 2009 15:03

Many years also since I have done SRA's but I do recall for those and the PRA's we got a pilot acknowledgment of the landing clearance this was however military and because we had to also hear the gear tone confirming the gear was down and locked. ;)

jamestkirk 9th Jan 2009 16:11

Thanks
 
Thanks for that.

matspart3 9th Jan 2009 22:45

CAP413 is correct....there's no need to acknowledge a landing clearance on an SRA terminating at less than 2 miles from touchdown. In fact, ATC shouldn't break the transmission for more than 5 seconds inside the last 4 miles of the approach. I've always spelt it out from the descent point syaing "Do not reply to further instructions, unless requested"...I have a vague recollection of that phrase being official.

Only a handful of places left doing half-milers these days...

Spitoon 10th Jan 2009 11:28

Don't know whether it's a misprint or not. But stop for a moment and think about why we do readbacks - to see that the instruction has been received and correctly so.

When doing a 1/2 mile SRA it's probably fair to conclude that the pilot is receiving the transmissions if the aircraft responds to instructions. In the landing situation there is normally a need to ensure that the correct aircraft has received the landing clearance - in a 1/2 mile SRA there will be no other aircraft on frequency (at least, none in a position to cause problems by hearing the words "cleared to land"), the risks associated with incorrect readback are minimal because the aircraft will be number 1 and the runway will be 'his'. Lots of the safeguards applied normally are simply not required in this particular operation.

Finally, I suspect issues like the above or, say, any claims that a permanent tx by the controller stops the pilot declaring an emergency or somesuch will be addressed by considering the exposure to the hazard in question.

jamestkirk 10th Jan 2009 11:33

thanks
 
I do 1/2 mile SRA's regularly so the advice is appreciated.

Fox3snapshot 10th Jan 2009 20:47

Spitoon, some good points. Especially as we had multiple GCA frequencies running at once and in the training environment there was a very short break from the handoff to the tower to the next aircraft checking on frequency so it was important we had the correct aircraft acknowledgment.


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:41.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.