Originally Posted by hansfalkenhagen
(Post 10234299)
To save me from reading over the last 6 months worth of posts for the third time, I have some questions I am hoping to have answered:
1. I've heard of some "pre-course learning material" you're expected to complete prior to training. What does this involve and how long should you expect to dedicate to it (I only ask as I may need to cancel a trip I have planned leading up to the course). 2. I've heard of some form of "verification test" during the assessment day. Does this involved resitting the SHL test or is it just the cognitive testing/simulator exercise we are expected to complete at the assessment centre? 3. Is the OPQ now conducted at the assessment centre or was it scrapped entirely from the application process? 4. Is the role for En Route controlling more autonomous, whereas Tower is more focussed to team work? 5. If you ended up on the Tower course, are you expected to slog away for a few years in a less desirable location rather than near a major city? Paying one's dues, more or less? 6. How many people are generally on each course? ie. what is the instructor to trainee ratio like? 7. What might be some of the reasons people fail during initial and field training? What might be some of the reasons people leave the profession early on? They may seem like some odd questions, but I am trying to fill in some gaps with the research I have already done. :) Thanks! |
6. Not sure how big the courses are at the moment, but in enroute they've varied from 8-16 people over the last few years. There is usually one instructor between two students during the actual simulation exercises (the sims are in pairs of consoles), with occasional bonus one-on-one available as instructor resources allow. At significant points - scheduled progress evaluations, or in the lead-up to exams or where extra support is necessary - one-on-one instruction is usually available.
7. You need to successfully pass 'milestone' assessments, which are practical tests in the simulator, at the end of each phase in order to progress to the next one. If you are unsuccessful, you should get another go, after targeted additional training to address whatever issues were identified the first time round. If you are unsuccessful the second time, you go "under training review" and may or may not get back-coursed for another shot. Sometimes it's an attitude problem that brings people to this point, sometimes it's a technical deficiency and sometimes it's just clear they don't "get it". |
Originally Posted by hansfalkenhagen
(Post 10234299)
To save me from reading over the last 6 months worth of posts for the third time, I have some questions I am hoping to have answered:
1. I've heard of some "pre-course learning material" you're expected to complete prior to training. What does this involve and how long should you expect to dedicate to it (I only ask as I may need to cancel a trip I have planned leading up to the course). 2. I've heard of some form of "verification test" during the assessment day. Does this involved resitting the SHL test or is it just the cognitive testing/simulator exercise we are expected to complete at the assessment centre? 3. Is the OPQ now conducted at the assessment centre or was it scrapped entirely from the application process? 4. Is the role for En Route controlling more autonomous, whereas Tower is more focussed to team work? 5. If you ended up on the Tower course, are you expected to slog away for a few years in a less desirable location rather than near a major city? Paying one's dues, more or less? 6. How many people are generally on each course? ie. what is the instructor to trainee ratio like? 7. What might be some of the reasons people fail during initial and field training? What might be some of the reasons people leave the profession early on? They may seem like some odd questions, but I am trying to fill in some gaps with the research I have already done. :) Thanks! 4. Enroute and tower both have aspects of autonomy about them and both require a lot of teamwork. It also all depends on the tower/sector/unit where you work as they are all unique. 5. It all comes down to resourcing needs and ability demonstrated at the academy. If there’s a current need for trainees at big city towers and you’ve had good results through the radar tower module there’s nothing to stop an Abinitio ending up at mel/syd etc.. but often the staffing needs are at regional towers and it’s easier to post a new trainee there than it is to take an operational controller off another roster, pay transfer costs and retrain them at an outback procedural tower. I think during the academy training that tower trainees are asked their preferences for a posting.. sometimes they get them, often they don’t. On the Flipside, usually after 2 or so years at a less desirable tower you’re generally in a pretty good position to put your hand up for a transfer to the tower of your choice. 6. When I was on course it was 8 per enroute course, 4 per tower course. 7. Getting through the training is hard work. You need a fair bit of motivation and drive and you also need a thick skin because there are times when it feels like you’re getting nowhere.. I’ve seen people fall over because of huge holes in their theoretical knowledge/understanding. Sometimes this is due to lack of effort, and sometimes it’s just due to overload of information or an inability to really understand the concepts. Ive also seen people who breeze through the theory, always have the right answer in discussions.. but then you put them in the sim or in front of live traffic and they can’t process what’s happening either due to pressure, or a lack of the natural perception skills necessary to do the job. Some people get through the academy without a hitch and then hit the real world and realise that they aren’t suited to the environment (shiftwork, required flexibility, group dynamics, politics etc) and give it up on their own accord. most that get through the training end up in a career they enjoy and are happy to endure all the above though because the good far outweighs the bad. |
I'll add my 2c worth (FWIW I'm well towards the other end of my career):
7. ATC is a complex job in that you need to perform reasonably well across a range of skills, consistently. Whether you can pull them all together to a high enough standard and consistently enough is what's tested in the sim - whether you've "got it" or not. Yes, training helps to an extent but mostly it's from within. As Whispr says you need to put in the hard yards memorising standards, etc. as well. Listen to the instructors, particularly in the field. Listen to other controllers giving tips. Yes you need self-confidence but it needs to be tempered - they're telling you these things for a reason. I've seen trainees go down for no other reason than over-confidence. Occasionally a trainee can't abstract themselves from the number of lives they're dealing with so find it too stressful. Be aware that gaining a rating isn't the end - you need to keep learning and showing improvement to retain the rating. Most people naturally do but occasionally not. ATC isn't the job for everyone and as Whispr says the reality sometimes just doesn't work with personal/family circumstances or priorities. You'll miss out on kid's birthdays, Christmas dinner, family events, gatherings with friends. There will be bad days during the training (and occasionally on the job) but you just have to push on or you will get left behind. Learn from them but don't dwell on them - ATC is a confidence "game" and if your head isn't in the right place no amount of ability will help. If you can overcome/cope with all that it's a great job. |
Training is a long, hard and relentless but being a well-rounded and motivated individual will stand you in good stead - not enough on it's own to get you through the training but a good start.
I don't mean to make it sound like a real downer because it's not. You'll hopefully enjoy the group camaraderie and form lifelong friendships. Just that it is tough. Maybe I'd better not mention the historic pass rate........:eek: FWIW there are signs that the current selection process is doing a good job. |
Originally Posted by hansfalkenhagen
(Post 10237395)
No stress! I think it's good for me, or anyone else reading for that matter, to know that getting a letter of offer from Airservices doesn't guarantee us a career as an ATC, and knowing that many do fail during training will only act as a constant reminder to work harder each day.
One more question though; I remember another user ("parishiltons"??) mentioning about the fatigue risk management system (FRMS) which is part of the organisation's safety management system (SMS). The Airservices' website also mentions about free gym membership and yoga lessons. Apart from exercise and a healthy diet, what else can be done to deal with the stress/pressure of the role and dealing with rotating shifts? In particular, what is taught to the candidates during training? (hoping I won't be told to just jump on to the wild turkey and marlboros...) |
One of the young guys I work with who went through the college about 2 years ago says there's a little bit of general stuff on human factors but that's about it. My view is that the actual controlling itself isn't particularly stressful - it's "fight or flight" type stress rather than chronic, so when you walk out the door it doesn't come with you. The only time it follows you is when something goes badly wrong, but hopefully those days are few and far between. The most stressful day I've had at work was being involved in a situation where a VFR flight was stuck on top of cloud and they had to descend through cloud several times due to it getting dark. It lasted over an hour all told and I seriously thought there was a good chance they'd die. Adrenaline and professionalism holds it all together while you're working but I was a wreck once I unplugged - shaking and emotional.
Managing shift work is a challenge. As parishiltons says, you need an understanding and supportive home environment - you aren't following the Mon-Fri 9-5 routine of the rest of your family so there has to be give and take to accommodate it. Doesn't help when the neighbour starts mowing when you're trying to sleep before a night shift though. Getting up at 7am when you have an 11pm finish doesn't necessarily work very well in the long term. |
Is there anyone out there from recent assessment days who would like to PM me with how you think you went and any advice for the day etc?
Thanks in advance for any info. |
Test
Originally Posted by mikewil
(Post 10246945)
Is there anyone out there from recent assessment days who would like to PM me with how you think you went and any advice for the day etc?
Thanks in advance for any info. I’m sitting it next Monday but by pure coincidence I had dinner with one of the guys who wrote the testing last night. He reckons all you’ve got to do is go in there nice and relaxed with a good nights sleep under your belt. You can’t train for it and it’s designed that way, so good luck! Regards, Andrew |
Any news from the people attending the assessment centre this week?
|
Hey Vandelayy, I got the boot half way through the day, no interview, so while I was told I'd be contacted to find out whether I was successful, I highly, highly doubt, I'd be given an offer without an interview.
|
@msage1993
Id love to reply to your message but it says your inbox is full, any chance you could delete a few old ones? |
Also curious to see how others have done this week
|
Has anyone from last weeks assessment heard any news yet?
|
Applications are open again
|
Originally Posted by hansfalkenhagen
(Post 10269277)
Any news from anyone in regards to what it means whether you are sent home early during the assessment day as opposed to staying longer?
I have heard mixed things of those who are sent home early have failed, but have also heard of many other instances were people felt as though they did badly on the tests/simulations and were asked to stay for an interview (which they felt they went well with) but were still given a "thanks but no thanks" a week or so later? Anyone have any info on this in regards to the current process? Does going home early strictly means you failed, whereas staying for an interview definitely means you passed? The Airservices website has recently removed info on the OPQ and the "behavioural based interview" from the recruitment process section. So perhaps things have changed again recently? |
Hey Guys,
Just dropping a line to see if anyone has just applied for the latest recruiting round - commencing October '18? I myself have and having read previous posts, most questions seem to be covered. Just interested if anyone else is in the same boat as me. Cheers |
Originally Posted by Kia Ora 1
(Post 10285303)
Hey Guys,
Just dropping a line to see if anyone has just applied for the latest recruiting round - commencing October '18? I myself have and having read previous posts, most questions seem to be covered. Just interested if anyone else is in the same boat as me. Cheers |
Originally Posted by DaphB
(Post 10285952)
I have also applied this round :) |
Is anyone able to share if the online tests are similar to those found on the SHL website? Or perhaps the FAA test is a good one to practice?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.