night manning
announced at lacc that as of 1st of may all sectors will have four controllers rostered for night shifts as a result of safety research conducted and views expressed at safety days. What do we all think of this move. personally I applaud the move and am pleased that the embarrassing situation of closing portions of uk airspace due staff sickness will be fewer.
|
I am Nats, but not a LACC bod, How many do u normally have per sector on nights? Is it 3?
TIO |
Prolly 3 more than you have doing procedural approaches on a night shift TIO.:}
|
Is that going to mean more flow and delays during the day?
|
nights
gonzo- hopefully not. but if so then so be it. We need to be fully staffed both day and night as I am sure you do. dealing with the oceanic rush and domestic outbounds at 0600 after being up with minimal rest is no fun.
As for one person doing procedural approaches at night I have no idea what the implications of that are but if you feel it is detrimental to safety then air your concerns as controllers at lacc have been doing. |
By no means was it a criticism, ifaxu. Just curious. :ok:
|
gonzo- no criticism taken. I respect the jobs that all Atco s do regardless of unit. I would imagine that yours is particularly demanding!
|
:D Uberlingen.
|
Uberlingen |
I don't know whether it is linked or not. I just think that Uberlinger should be something we constantly consider when we talk about allocation of human resource. In this circumstance, things appear to have gone in a positive direction.
|
As for one person doing procedural approaches at night I have no idea what the implications of that are but if you feel it is detrimental to safety then air your concerns as controllers at lacc have been doing. |
Originally Posted by London Mil
(Post 3199732)
I don't know whether it is linked or not. I just think that Uberlinger should be something we constantly consider when we talk about allocation of human resource. In this circumstance, things appear to have gone in a positive direction.
Could not find any announcement about additional night manning at LACC, nothing on the EBS either. :\ BD |
If this is the case then a very well done to the Swanwick reps.
This has been a major bone of contention on the unit for the last couple of years and although it will mean more nights for most, the "easier" regime on nights will be most welcome. For you guys not on the unit, this will mean 2 hours on and 2 hours off for all of the sector groups and therefore no handling of, in some cases, 60 movements/hour by staff on minimum rest. :ok: :ok: |
Hopefully this will come in although i have heard doubts as to whether it will actually come in. Heard the GM is still looking into it.
With 3 ATCO's on the combined sectors then you are on minimal rest periods for both nights & therefore could be stuck on radar from 4.30am-6.30am at the end of the 2nd night-shift with a busy eastbound flow of transatlantics. A recipe for disaster. |
Have often wondered how lone night working is still allowed.At abcd airport the night shift is a one person shift (i mean one person-no assistant). Movements vary over the months between 6 and 12 per night( a mixture of cargo and pax flights). They are usually spread out through the night but occasionally 2 or 3 happen together. Procedural control, obviously. Often feel dog tired at the end of the night.
As someone pointed out, if it's not legislated against then why would an airport authority pay for the extra staff? |
BD is being slightly economical here..
there were a number of recommendations which NATS implemented Also.... staffing was not the issue. Hopefully things are more "enlightened" now. (and yes, I think they are!) Best rgds BEX |
Originally Posted by BEXIL160
(Post 3201801)
BD is being slightly economical here..
NATS response to the Uberlingen report was kept confidential to the NATS board only. Copies were, and still are, not available to the great unwashed, unless BD wants to furnish one. ( At the time I ASKED for a copy, and I have ASKED subsequently and been denied, twice... so much for "open and honest") Also.....Except that at the time of Uberlingen NATS was trying to reduce night manning at Swanwick to a single Tactical controller per sector (documented by the union and here on PPruNe). This was hastily dropped, but there's no getting away from the fact that NATS management at the time seriously desired to implement single sector manning. BD |
NATS response to the Uberlingen report was kept confidential to the NATS board only there's no getting away from the fact that NATS management at the time seriously desired to implement single sector manning If there is clear opposition to changs such as this, be clear about why it's not safe. If it's compelling it should be relatively simple to prove the case :confused: |
NATS response to Uberlingen still remains confidential. I have tried TWICE to get a copy. After much research I have been told twice (and have been told in writing) that it will remain so. My last attempt was in December 2006. Curious? (to quote BD). Why so?
Withdrawal of single sector staffing plans and talk of Ueberlingen gives the impression of these things being linked, Nothing disingenuous. Single sector manning isn't safe. (unless you consider a tired, lone controller at their lowest ebb, in the middle of the night, much safer than one accompanied by a qualified colleague able to monitor any errors.... no, i thought not....:rolleyes: ) BEX |
How many sectors around the world are single manned - at any time, day or night. What is ICAO or IFATCA policy?
I believe that there should not be 'single controllers on station' by policy of the above, but that is very different from single controllers doing different jobs. i.e. 6 controllers for 6 very different sectors with no co ratings/endorsements. If it is so dangerous to work that way in the UK, what about the rest of Europe and the world? And what can be done about it? |
Night Manning?... hmmm very non-PC , or maybe its policy to let the totty go home in time to get the tea, bath the kids etc at your unit? (Not Mil/ex-mil are you?)
|
keep 'pc' mania out of this
|
Anybody know the outcome of todays meeting regarding 4 on nights at LACC?
|
A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.
Not just a UK problem
But 18 minutes? Did he take his lunch and a book? (I feel that this was posted earlier but couldn't find it. Apologies if so) |
Had confirmation today that there will be 4 on nights on all sectors at LACC as from May 1st.
|
Yeh, just heard that at work today
Thanks 5miles |
Originally Posted by 5milesbaby
(Post 3231750)
Had confirmation today that there will be 4 on nights on all sectors at LACC as from May 1st.
BD |
No more S53's. Easy.
|
BDIONU
I don`t see what a DD&C has to do with anything. I have done them before with 3 people on nights. From what i understand is that by only having 3 on nights then you are relying on the sectors being bandboxed by 11pm (when the 1500-2300 people go home) and then not splitting till 5.30am when the 1st morning person comes in. By doing away with the 5.30am shift & having 4 on nights then it gives you the freedom to keep the sectors split late in the evening & also gives the capacity to split early in the morning which with the increasing traffic in the summer then it is needed some days depending on the eastbound track structure. |
There will be 4 people rostered for each night pairing every night, therefore 20 ATCO's per night on radar duties. If that means that all 4 have to work for part of the night shift at the same time then so be it (been there before), we'll always ensure we stay within hours. On South and West at the start of the shift during the summer this will be the norm, additionally West splits at the end of the shift around 530am. Its not impossible to roster the extra bodies, although I have heard that the north bank may have to re-jig again to get the night validations syncronized to fit all watches. Haven't we been down this road before????
There isn't any problem rostering for DD&C's, only 1 extra ATCO was needed for South and that was always done. The problems came when one of those rostered went sick, trying to find cover short notice is not easy. However the ATSA's struggle sometimes to get their extra bodies needed for a DD&C, but thats not affected by the ATCO change. |
The announcement
The LACC Management Team has listened carefully to concerns expressed by numerous members of staff regarding the issue of ATCO numbers at night. We have as a consequence decided to undertake a complete review which will consider all aspects of the situation. Accordingly a small working group has been formed to investigate the requirement, form conclusions and make any necessary recommendations to LACC Senior Management.
There is an ongoing period of consultation which includes Prospect and the Operational Management team. To allow this process sufficient time and without prejudice to the conclusion we have agreed a temporary increase in the number of ATCOs on a night duty to 4 in each LAG for the month of May. It is anticipated that the above process will be concluded in sufficient time for any permanent changes to be made in time for the June rosters. |
Got that letter today BDiONU, seems isn't as clear cut as first thought. What is it with NATS management that they can't even tell the troops what the plans are, just release snippits and when everyone thinks they know what the score is, the goal posts get moved. Also heard that its a fact that some watches CANNOT provide 4 on every night shift every cycle every month and for it to work shift changes will have to occur or we wait for more single sector valid controllers to gain a night pairing. PSS will also get affected but don't understand it so have no idea on the impact but believe it'll come down to providing less bodies in the ops room during the day.
And this is the progress NATS have made over the last 5 years - think we need some more destinations to fail just to prove the ops room is the 'weak link' in the whole operation and maybe they'll cut us loose so we can go be part of a real air traffic company that focuses on the MAIN aim of the business. Is that starting to sound like a rant????? :oh: :mad: :oh: |
Originally Posted by 5milesbaby
(Post 3238902)
Got that letter today BDiONU, <snip> Also heard that its a fact that some watches CANNOT provide 4 on every night shift every cycle every month and for it to work shift changes will have to occur or we wait for more single sector valid controllers to gain a night pairing. PSS will also get affected but don't understand it so have no idea on the impact but believe it'll come down to providing less bodies in the ops room during the day.
BD |
So far we've managed to stand out, as Barron wanted, as a major ANSP. We were the only one to regularly have closures of airspace at night due to inadequate night manning.
This will certainly help ro reduce the amount of airspace closures as well as providing some sensible contingency-15% of overloads took place with minimum manning, and therefore no ability to get the sector split or the ATCO relieved. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.