Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Wake turbulence seperation from helipad (less than 760m) to runway

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Wake turbulence seperation from helipad (less than 760m) to runway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Nov 2020, 11:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Sweden
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wake turbulence seperation from helipad (less than 760m) to runway

Hi ATC's

Any of you guys working at airfields with medium size helicopters departing from a helipad, where the helipad is less than 760m to a runway where you depart light aircrafts?

If yes, do you provide a 2 min (or 3 min from intermediate) wake turbulence seperation to the light aircraft departing from the runway?

According to PANS OPS DOC 4444, 5.8.3.1, a 2 minute departure seperation need to be in place in case
"parallel runways separated by less than 760 m (2 500 ft)"
. So if you have a helipad closer than 760m, would you as ATC interpret the helipad as being the same definition as a runway, and make wake turbulence seperation to the light aircraft departing from the actual runway?

Thanks in advance for any inputs
Asdfghjk is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2020, 19:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, at LHR we have a helipad/FATO that’s 250m from the edge of the nearest runway, and we only apply wake separation if an A380 is using the runway.

I do realise that’s not the question, that you were asking about lighter aircraft on the runway behind a heavier helicopter, but the theory holds.

See ICAO Annex 14 vol 2, table 3-1:
Gonzo is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2020, 20:00
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Sweden
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Gonzo

Thanks for the info and reference to FATO seperation.

Seems FATO only deals with the seperation for the helicopter departing the helipad. Do you know if it also goes the other way around. So if you depart a medium helicopter from a helipad 300m from the runway, can you then depart a light aircraft from the runway without wake turbulence seperation?
Asdfghjk is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2020, 14:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: TWR
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting question. I do not apply wake turbulence separation between medium/light when having paralell operations from FATO and RWY (distance between is approx 150m), and none of my collegues do either. This was up for discussion at my unit when FATO was established, and it was concluded that 4444 5.8.3.1 does not apply in this situation. Departure direction from our FATO is perpendicular to the RWY, and can in no way be interpreted as parallel as is a prerequisite for 5.8.3.1 to apply.

I will however caution of wake turbulence if there is crosswind together with traffic information if the winds are such that wake will blow towards the light.
UnableATC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.