IDENT
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IDENT
Flew with a captain recently who said he’d noticed a trend of FOs pressing the ident button before it had been requested of them by the departure frequency (particularly out of EGKK where they often ask you to use it).
Any controllers have an opinion on this? Annoying or acceptable? Personally I wouldn’t use it unless I’ve been asked...
Any controllers have an opinion on this? Annoying or acceptable? Personally I wouldn’t use it unless I’ve been asked...
An IDENT squawk can only be used by a controller to identify an aircraft when it is observed as a response to the controller's request for IDENT so anyone (not just FOs) who presses the button without specifically being told to is wasting both their own time and the controllers.
NB There was a time in the early days of code/callsign conversion when an IDENT was required to tell the computer to convert the code to the casllsign but these days have long gone.
NB There was a time in the early days of code/callsign conversion when an IDENT was required to tell the computer to convert the code to the casllsign but these days have long gone.
Last edited by chevvron; 14th Jan 2019 at 15:37.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Marseille France
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I want to said "never push IDENT" if the ATCO doesn't ask you to do it.
Suppose in the same area, a controller ask to an other aircraft to push IDENT, and you push IDENT, it can be a source of misunderstanding, and the ATCO can think the airplane he ask to push IDENT is the wrong location on his screen.
It can become very dangerous...
Suppose in the same area, a controller ask to an other aircraft to push IDENT, and you push IDENT, it can be a source of misunderstanding, and the ATCO can think the airplane he ask to push IDENT is the wrong location on his screen.
It can become very dangerous...
Join Date: May 2000
Location: On top of the world
Age: 73
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Acceptable to simply IDENT when requested without verbal acknowledgement, or not?
5.9 The pilot must respond to SSR instructions, reading back specific settings.
"BIGJET 347, squawk ident "
"Squawk ident, BIGJET 347"
As fredix says above, if the wrong aircraft squawks, all sorts of issues can arise.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reference
It is mentioned in FLIGHT PROCEDURES (DOC 8168) - SECONDARY SURVEILLANCE RADAR (SSR) TRANSPONDER OPERATING PROCEDURES
1 OPERATION OF TRANSPONDERS
1.1 GENERAL
.
.
1.1.6 Pilots shall not SQUAWK IDENT unless requested by ATC.
Hope this helps.
1 OPERATION OF TRANSPONDERS
1.1 GENERAL
.
.
1.1.6 Pilots shall not SQUAWK IDENT unless requested by ATC.
Hope this helps.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As an ATCO this is a conversation that we've been having over the last week or so. It's definitely on the increase. I just ask them to Squawk ident and often the reply comes back 'squawk ident again'.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I understand it, the requirement / need to IDENT has to do with what sort of handover between tower and departure has occurred?
Last edited by Busdriver01; 30th Jan 2019 at 09:29. Reason: Type
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Hadley's Hope, LV426
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Different units have different procedures, however it is typically used at busier units where there is a lot of traffic on the Radar. Have also heard of it being used en-route for similar reasons.
Used to be done using an 'on channel' intercom (ie the tower controller selects the frequency of the departure controller and tells them of the departure without transmitting it on RTF) but nowadays this procedure seems to have been phased out in favour of making a telephone call or the tower controller just transferring the aircraft to departures and the departure controller requesting the ident..
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A controller can identify a departing aircraft via a known airborne time as an alternative to an ident squawk but this must be done within a fixed distance from the end of the runway so at busier units it may not be possible to use this method.
Used to be done using an 'on channel' intercom (ie the tower controller selects the frequency of the departure controller and tells them of the departure without transmitting it on RTF) but nowadays this procedure seems to have been phased out in favour of making a telephone call or the tower controller just transferring the aircraft to departures and the departure controller requesting the ident..
Used to be done using an 'on channel' intercom (ie the tower controller selects the frequency of the departure controller and tells them of the departure without transmitting it on RTF) but nowadays this procedure seems to have been phased out in favour of making a telephone call or the tower controller just transferring the aircraft to departures and the departure controller requesting the ident..
Just out of interest: its almost exclusively used in the UK - is the UKs radar environment so much different from the others ? Never had to squawk ident out of Amsterdam or Frankfurt or other real busy airports. Or is it just one of these things that always had been done ? Should not Mode S give you all the required info ?