Hectopascals
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HPa
its all to do with the US habit of knocking off the “2” so 29.91 becomes 991 on the RT.... There was an Airprox a while ago in the Shetland Isles between a US crew in a Kimg Air and an ATR. That’s what caused it all, I’m told. The AAIB report refers.
Having said that, I went to SNN recently and the atco asked us what units we were using. Mb obv....! Well, we were tempted to say it for a bit of sport but remained professional with HPa.
Having said that, I went to SNN recently and the atco asked us what units we were using. Mb obv....! Well, we were tempted to say it for a bit of sport but remained professional with HPa.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The result of a number of level busts including a couple where terrain was a factor, from 99X being misunderstood as 29.9X
Oh? What? Were they?
Well why the digamma did they change it then? That is not progress.
Regretfully hectopascals is an ICAO SARP, not an EU requirement. Nobody knows why ICAO decided on hPa instead of mb especially as the value is the same.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nobody knows why ICAO decided on hPa instead of mb especially as the value is the same.
Since (on an appropriate scale) metric aircraft use milimetres to measure length, mililitres to measure volume, miliamps to measure current, milivolts in the electronics, miliTeslas in magnetic fields, and above all pressure in bars it seems a completely retrograde step to suddenly divert from this logical and self-evident progression to abandon milibars in favour of the (to most) largely meaningless hectopascal, be it an SI unit or not.
To me, progress that ain't.
To me, progress that ain't.