Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Hectopascals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Mar 2019, 05:41
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HPa

its all to do with the US habit of knocking off the “2” so 29.91 becomes 991 on the RT.... There was an Airprox a while ago in the Shetland Isles between a US crew in a Kimg Air and an ATR. That’s what caused it all, I’m told. The AAIB report refers.
Having said that, I went to SNN recently and the atco asked us what units we were using. Mb obv....! Well, we were tempted to say it for a bit of sport but remained professional with HPa.
Thrush is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2019, 09:07
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thrush
Having said that, I went to SNN recently and the atco asked us what units we were using. Mb obv....! Well, we were tempted to say it for a bit of sport but remained professional with HPa.
Yep, we’re required to say it even above 1000, plus we add a zero if below 1000: “Zero Niner Niner Seven hectoPascals”

The result of a number of level busts including a couple where terrain was a factor, from 99X being misunderstood as 29.9X
faoiarvok is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2019, 05:56
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
There was a suggestion a couple of years ago that an abbreviation of 'hectopascals' might be looked into and agreed, but I've heard nothing since.
chevvron is online now  
Old 13th Mar 2019, 12:55
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,610
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
There was a suggestion a couple of years ago that an abbreviation of 'hectopascals' might be looked into and agreed, but I've heard nothing since.
There is always millibars, a universally-used unit that we all understand and can relate to, unlike the bizarre, meaningless Eurobabble hector-pastilles.

Oh? What? Were they?

Well why the digamma did they change it then? That is not progress.
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2019, 14:30
  #45 (permalink)  
DB6
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Age: 61
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Millibars? Nah, not enough syllables .
DB6 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2019, 18:09
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DB6,

We're lucky........It could have been Gay-Lussac who did the pressure experiments......Or even worse, Avogadro.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2019, 19:43
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Imagine if there had been more recent research into pressure by Prof. Brian Cox.

'Hectocox'? Or 'Hectocoxes'.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2019, 09:18
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 94 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
There is always millibars, a universally-used unit that we all understand and can relate to, unlike the bizarre, meaningless Eurobabble hector-pastilles.

Oh? What? Were they?

Well why the digamma did they change it then? That is not progress.
Regretfully hectopascals is an ICAO SARP, not an EU requirement. Nobody knows why ICAO decided on hPa instead of mb especially as the value is the same.
chevvron is online now  
Old 14th Mar 2019, 14:18
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nobody knows why ICAO decided on hPa instead of mb especially as the value is the same.
Not strictly true. ICAO has chosen - with a small number of well defined exceptions - the International System of Units to be used as the standard system of units of measurement for all aspects of international civil aviation air and ground operations. This makes some sense - why pick/develop/use something else when the vast majority of States worldwide (although, notably, not the US) have agreed to use SI units. By practise and general agreement the units are given names related to scientists whose work was related to the element being measured; for pressure the work of Blaise Pascal was selected (perhaps interestingly, the same Pascal after whom the computer programming language is named). ICAO, since its inception, has sought to harmonise the units of measurement used in aviation - originally it recognised five different sets of units that were used globally - and adopted a harmonised set of units based on SI in 1979. In 1984 ICAO States agreed that the days of the bar were numbered and set the end of 1985 as the final date that the bar would be used in aviation. The UK held out against the change for some time and continued to use the millibar for met reports and related purposes - clearly there are a few people on this form who think this is a good thing although personally I tend to find more important things to get excited about and got used to using hPa within a day or two of their eventual mandate in UK ATC. Oh, and just in case the final bit of the puzzle is still not obvious, 'hecto' is the SI prefix for hundreds of things.
LookingForAJob is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2019, 14:34
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank heavens we're still using feet for all things vertical. Long may it continue to be so.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2019, 14:51
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,610
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
Since (on an appropriate scale) metric aircraft use milimetres to measure length, mililitres to measure volume, miliamps to measure current, milivolts in the electronics, miliTeslas in magnetic fields, and above all pressure in bars it seems a completely retrograde step to suddenly divert from this logical and self-evident progression to abandon milibars in favour of the (to most) largely meaningless hectopascal, be it an SI unit or not.

To me, progress that ain't.
meleagertoo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.