London City ATC news today
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If EGLC tower proves it can be done as safely and efficiently etc from Hampshire, can it not be done as safely and efficiently from say Spain? Or Latvia? Poland? One assumes as long as you have the secure data connection, and trained staff it would be no issue. Cost savings would definitely be more apparent in those locations.
Also, did someone decide "Digital" was more palatable to the masses than "Remote"?
Also, did someone decide "Digital" was more palatable to the masses than "Remote"?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thinking about the Met Office, who is going to make Wx observations when the controllers are miles away?
At many units now, the task of 'met observer' has now been passed on to ATC staff. The observations have an impact on the way each airfield operates, and therefore must be accurate.
Who will be trained to make the METAR obs when the remote-tower is up and running?
At many units now, the task of 'met observer' has now been passed on to ATC staff. The observations have an impact on the way each airfield operates, and therefore must be accurate.
Who will be trained to make the METAR obs when the remote-tower is up and running?
Thinking about the Met Office, who is going to make Wx observations when the controllers are miles away?
At many units now, the task of 'met observer' has now been passed on to ATC staff. The observations have an impact on the way each airfield operates, and therefore must be accurate.
Who will be trained to make the METAR obs when the remote-tower is up and running?
At many units now, the task of 'met observer' has now been passed on to ATC staff. The observations have an impact on the way each airfield operates, and therefore must be accurate.
Who will be trained to make the METAR obs when the remote-tower is up and running?
Assistants still have to verify the ob is correct and determine the type of precipitation if any for which they do a special course not as complex as the Met Observer Course.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rapunzel's tower
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any statistical data to back up your first assertion regarding the Met Office? Or is it purely subjective?
On the other point I've quoted...why would digital towers be an erosion of the responsibilities and skill-sets of ATCOs?
It's the same job, with the same responsibilities.
The technology involved offers more situational awareness for the ATCOs, which is a good thing surely?
Every ATCO makes mistakes at work. Tools which make it less likely for ATCOs to make mistakes, and for ATCOs to make more timely interventions when things go wrong, are surely a good thing.
ATCOs do NOT make mistakes at work, only at home or when driving the wife somewhere.
NB If I could figure out how to attach a smiley, I would.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rapunzel's tower
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1 How do you judge the level of rain from a digital tower?
2 Really? (I am not against remote towers for some operations)
3 What is in the new 'tower' that is new tech or could not be put into the old one. 30 years is not old for a UK tower.
Do you have an aldis lamp now? Will you have a digital one in LCY TWR 2?
Are you going to have virtual early goes?
2 Really? (I am not against remote towers for some operations)
3 What is in the new 'tower' that is new tech or could not be put into the old one. 30 years is not old for a UK tower.
Do you have an aldis lamp now? Will you have a digital one in LCY TWR 2?
Are you going to have virtual early goes?
That's what Met observers are trained to judge, using a variety of available indications.
2. Yes (In my opinion)
3. For one, you can't put flight labels on windows, nor can you put map overlays on them, and plenty more good reasons.
An ALDIS lamp is a basic requirement today (though as I understand it not all airfields have them??). If you'd looked around the subject I'm sure you'd have noticed that a Light Signal Gun attached to a PTZ camera can fulfil this requirement.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Flight labels on windows"
What's all this?? AS for Aldis lamps, at most airfields they went out with the ark and I doubt very much if pilots of heavy jets know much about them nowadays.
What's all this?? AS for Aldis lamps, at most airfields they went out with the ark and I doubt very much if pilots of heavy jets know much about them nowadays.
When you visit Blackbushe later today, ask them if they still have an Aldis lamp. I think you'll find they do; we certainly have one at Fairoaks but Farnborough ditched theirs in the move to the 'new' (Mk 4) tower in 2002.
Every aerodrome that I ever worked at had a signal lamp - whether literally an Aldis or not. For zero upkeep, just occasionally, they are useful - for communication with WIP, if not aircraft. They certainly did not go out with the ark and it is a blinkered view to suggest that they did. Pilots of "heavy jets" most certainly should know the meanings of light signals, which are enshrined in SERA in the case of Europe.
As regards the additional technology that is available with a digital control tower, there is no doubt that it might well be useful as an add-on in a proper (conventional) tower, but not exactly vital.
The one question that I see Nats avoiding - or perhaps I have missed it - is WHY? There has to be an ulterior motive, knowing them, and it certainly will not be to enhance the status or conditions for the controllers.
The one necessary HF still to be addressed is the injection of JetA1 and freshly mown grass into the air conditioning - oh, and a genuine enthusiasm for aircraft in tomorrow's controllers.
2 s
As regards the additional technology that is available with a digital control tower, there is no doubt that it might well be useful as an add-on in a proper (conventional) tower, but not exactly vital.
The one question that I see Nats avoiding - or perhaps I have missed it - is WHY? There has to be an ulterior motive, knowing them, and it certainly will not be to enhance the status or conditions for the controllers.
The one necessary HF still to be addressed is the injection of JetA1 and freshly mown grass into the air conditioning - oh, and a genuine enthusiasm for aircraft in tomorrow's controllers.
2 s
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: farfaraway
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the event of an RTF failure, how will the Aldis Lamp work?
Mr Zooker, you really are showing your age, the last time Iused an Aldis lamp the intended recipient called me and asked"wots that red light on the tower",which I suppose one could argue had the desired effect.
Mr Zooker, you really are showing your age, the last time Iused an Aldis lamp the intended recipient called me and asked"wots that red light on the tower",which I suppose one could argue had the desired effect.
Mr Zooker, you really are showing your age
2 s
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi good egg
This whole scenario sadly reminds me of a comment made by one of our senior ATCOs, many years ago.
"If NATS wanted a dog, they wouldn't buy a dog.......They'd buy a cat, and teach it to bark".
2359........Watch continues.
This whole scenario sadly reminds me of a comment made by one of our senior ATCOs, many years ago.
"If NATS wanted a dog, they wouldn't buy a dog.......They'd buy a cat, and teach it to bark".
2359........Watch continues.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, good egg.
Apologies for the delay in replying, but sadly, I have no statistical data to back up my assertions that the Met Office have lost the plot.
Just a lifelong interest in meteorology.
But, it's hardly surprising, is it, considering the paucity of the data they're now having to work with?
Apologies for the delay in replying, but sadly, I have no statistical data to back up my assertions that the Met Office have lost the plot.
Just a lifelong interest in meteorology.
But, it's hardly surprising, is it, considering the paucity of the data they're now having to work with?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rapunzel's tower
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, good egg.
Apologies for the delay in replying, but sadly, I have no statistical data to back up my assertions that the Met Office have lost the plot.
Just a lifelong interest in meteorology.
But, it's hardly surprising, is it, considering the paucity of the data they're now having to work with?
Apologies for the delay in replying, but sadly, I have no statistical data to back up my assertions that the Met Office have lost the plot.
Just a lifelong interest in meteorology.
But, it's hardly surprising, is it, considering the paucity of the data they're now having to work with?
In fact the Met Office use many more sources of data than ever before in order to produce their forecasts. The list of their sources continues to grow, not shrink, as time passes...because added information, or situational awareness, is beneficial for them too.
I'm guessing this thread drift is about a perceived loss of local knowledge and how that might be detrimental??
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rapunzel's tower
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts