Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

ICAO Radio Failure Procedures

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ICAO Radio Failure Procedures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Apr 2017, 17:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: N5552.0W00419.0ish
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not really that moot.

Firstly, as pointed out. Follow the procedure, and you can be seen to be behaving predictably.
Do something different, and maybe you start to cause greater concerns.
Secondly. What if your planned route is relatively short, or comm fail is quite late? In the time it takes to get a pair of jets to intercept you, you may already be at your destination. If you end up at the appropriate fix, descend as appropriate, and arrange your approach to be close to (as practicable) your planned arrival time, then hopefully all should end well.

(I shall now duck for cover, and don anti-flaming suit)

Last edited by Lancelot de boyles; 4th Apr 2017 at 20:39.
Lancelot de boyles is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 01:03
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Djakarta
Age: 36
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the posts.

arrow
arrow28 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 12:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: etha
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think about the application rather than the procedure. In the real world what would really happen? Anything is the answer, and every ATCO across the world will be trained with this in mind.

There are so many ways and means of understanding a problem and knowing what the next move is, watching Mode S to see the level select, heading select etc, squawking 7600, sending messages to company, Sat Phones, or if losing RTF is a feature of failures, watching everything failing (ie Mode S or elements of it all the way to total transponder failure).

Whatever the circumstances, I can imagine a pair of escorts will be soon on the scene and every other track in the vicinity will be vectored elsewhere, it almost doesn't matter what you do in the cockpit, because you'll be the only one in your piece of sky anyway.
zonoma is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 16:31
  #24 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
SIGNIFICANT THREAD DRIFT SUGGESTED:

What was the reason for a RCF - other than crew's fingertrouble / falling asleep - that you heard / know of? With today's, no: 1990's, technology I wonder.

Maybe time for ATCOs' stories ...
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 18:15
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I visited Swanick last year with a group from my airline and one of our hosts asked what we thought about returning to the departure airfield in the event of a radio failure. We commented that we might be going around the hold for a number of hours to get down to a reasonable landing weight.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 21:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting comment from tubby.

Many years ago, the subject of RTF failure came up at one of our 'pilot/controller forums'......Held at a local hostelry, over beer and chilli/curry.
When we asked the question....."What would you do if you experienced RTF failure while flying a SID"?
Several pilots from the same operator agreed that they would squawk 7600 and return to the inbound hold.
"If you think I'm going to the Iberian Peninsula, Greece, or The Canaries without a radio, think again", were the reasons given.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2017, 14:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Middle East
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
I do not understand the option "or if in VMC proceed to land at suitable airport". How is that supposed to work, in class C airspace? Or any.
I guess the procedure is covering all types of aircrafts (from C152 to 380) in all types of environments (from Mbuji May Congo to JFK)

That's why the procedure still offer the option:
"in IMC or when the pilot of an IFR flight consider that VMC procedure is not appropriate"

So out of JFK, if you fancy green/red lights, flares and all the ****, you are given the choice to return in VMC or to continue.

Out of Mbuji May, same procedure. (Just don't wait too much for flares as they probably don't have some )

Last edited by Feather44; 21st Apr 2017 at 14:18.
Feather44 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2017, 14:33
  #28 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thank you sir, I'll highlight that for future debates.
FlightDetent is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.