NATS recruiting controllers externally?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: middle earth
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NATS recruiting controllers externally?
It seems there's an ad out for ATCO (s)? At Stansted
Not like NATS to recruit controllers directly from outside (yes I have heard it happens occasionally but the external Ad for the job is a bit unusual)
What's happened to their college training pipeline?
Not like NATS to recruit controllers directly from outside (yes I have heard it happens occasionally but the external Ad for the job is a bit unusual)
What's happened to their college training pipeline?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home away from home
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They had to recruit externally in a hurry prior to opening the extended Farnborough LARS. I think this covered Western Radar too.
Years ago, NATS used to require people to complete the entire course if they hadn't trained with NATS originally.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: southampton
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 16 person basic course slated to go ADI and APP has just started. How many and up at airports or at TC is the question. NATS has got its numbers wrong and is now playing catch up. They let too many people go on VR so everywhere is understaffed including the college so the numbers of students can't ramp up much beyond 16 - 20 on a course. But those trainees won't be at unit and valid for at least 18 - 24 mths. Stansted taking on an experienced controller should at least shorten the process to getting an extra body.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: swanlake
Age: 54
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know of 1 ATCO at Swanwick (not a happy bunny with this coming up and no contact) who thought they were on "a list"
I see bigger issues with taking internally ( call me cynical). 1.Is that individual near the top of their pay scale.. 2. If they in the defined benefit pension scheme.
If near the top of 1 and also in 2 then the costs would be significantly higher than hiring externally. If I was holding the purse strings, I know what I'd do.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dorset
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How also does this external recruitment fit with a lot of the disparaging comments seen on this forum and in coversations around the company about the suitability of "non-NATS" ATCOs coming to BB and KK?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny how NATS usual policy of only possibly ever recruiting ab-initio through their precious in house college and the frankly disgusting comments bandied about on this forum by their own ATCO staff about being so 'superior' in regards to BB and KK are now really exposed like the trash they are
Yes, it may take a special type of ATCO to validate at certain units, be it BB, KK or in this instance, SS.
However. It does not have to be a NATS ab-initio trained, NATS unit previously validated etc etc ATCO.
Yes, it may take a special type of ATCO to validate at certain units, be it BB, KK or in this instance, SS.
However. It does not have to be a NATS ab-initio trained, NATS unit previously validated etc etc ATCO.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Do Not Know Yet?
Age: 44
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never went to the NATS' college and I am valid in two sectors in TC.
I think your comment is a bit unfair, you have to be in the right place at the right time.
Sometimes you also have to take on the risk yourself. I gambled a lot to be where I am now, it was definitely worth it, but bloody hard work.
I think your comment is a bit unfair, you have to be in the right place at the right time.
Sometimes you also have to take on the risk yourself. I gambled a lot to be where I am now, it was definitely worth it, but bloody hard work.
We had a young lady at Farnborough who self funded her training and she was fully as good as NATS trained staff.
She went to Gatwick from Farnborough but whether she has stayed there with the change of ATS provider I don't know.
She went to Gatwick from Farnborough but whether she has stayed there with the change of ATS provider I don't know.
That's a pity, I always got on well with her.
Mind you I shouldn't be surprised as 3 other people I knew over the years went to Gatwick; 1 succeeded and the other 2 came back to Farnborough having 'failed'.
There was another who had a 'compulsory' posting there during the 'station downgrading' phase of the '80s/90s. For those unaware, long before 'Bands 1 to 5' were invented, NATS decided that most medium/small airfields shouldn't have ATCO 2s as the 'working' grade but they should be ATCO 3s, so those '2s on the unit either had to agree to a downgrade or get a posting to an ATCO 2 post.
This particular person refused to do either (he wasn't the only one in NATS either) and was first given a compuslory posting to Gatwick. I forget what happened but he returned to Farnborough from where he was given a 'compulsory' to CATC.
Mind you I shouldn't be surprised as 3 other people I knew over the years went to Gatwick; 1 succeeded and the other 2 came back to Farnborough having 'failed'.
There was another who had a 'compulsory' posting there during the 'station downgrading' phase of the '80s/90s. For those unaware, long before 'Bands 1 to 5' were invented, NATS decided that most medium/small airfields shouldn't have ATCO 2s as the 'working' grade but they should be ATCO 3s, so those '2s on the unit either had to agree to a downgrade or get a posting to an ATCO 2 post.
This particular person refused to do either (he wasn't the only one in NATS either) and was first given a compuslory posting to Gatwick. I forget what happened but he returned to Farnborough from where he was given a 'compulsory' to CATC.
Last edited by chevvron; 10th Apr 2016 at 00:49.