ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Class D transits

Old 21st Mar 2016, 22:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 52N
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Class D transits

Can anyone who controls Class D tell me whether they would normally prefer me to request an IFR or VFR transit clearance through their airspace (when flying in VMC)? I prefer to transit as high as possible to keep out of the way of slower traffic, e.g 5000ft through Solent and FL075 through the Channel Islands airspace. Most of the time you ask whether I would like an IFR or VFR clearance, obviously I don't want to risk the possibility of being denied entry if I choose the wrong option.
Marchettiman is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 00:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
transit through CAT D - dream on !!
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 02:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 47
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VFR, always VFR.... So dead easy to handle.... Cleared to cross, traffic is....

(May be a few restrictions near runways though)
jmmoric is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 09:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFR, always IFR...so dead easy to handle... Cleared to cross on heading x at altitude y...

Then I have complete control...
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 10:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochdale
Age: 48
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that's 1-1, do we have a decider?
chillindan is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 11:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 682
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It depends.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 11:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SE England
Posts: 682
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Busy airport low level with no gaps in the traffic - VFR is easy enough with no delay, but IFR gives the ATCO more control (and responsibility), so VFR is still probably easier.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 15:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rapunzel's tower
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Control zone transits - VFR every time (if weather permits)
good egg is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 16:40
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think I've refused a VFR transit of my Class C zone in the 13 years I've worked here when the weather has been appropriate. I have radar and pass traffic. From my memory of the UK, it can be a bit restrictive when it comes to transits: protecting airspace for the possibility of a go around etc. We just modify the go around instructions and pass traffic.
cossack is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2016, 05:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought a possible solution would be to request one, but inform the controller that you are able to take the other if it suits them better...

i.e. ...........request VFR entry clearance, can accept IFR clearance if required

.....as you have seen from the replies here, it may depend on traffic situation, weather, level, etc. So what might be good for the traffic in the Class D on one day might not be so good on another day. Giving the controller the choice for what suits them better is always a nice way of doing it!!

If all you state is requesting entry clearance, then yes we will ask which flight rules you can prefer or can accept.
Neptune262 is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2016, 09:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Out on the bike in Northumberland
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think Neptune has that right, most days VFR will work, especially if the transit can be a bit flexible, but other times the certainty of IFR can mean you get just what you want.
almost professional is online now  
Old 23rd Mar 2016, 20:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: antrim
Age: 63
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try flying in Northern Ireland and getting a transit through Aldergrove airspace at 2000 feet VFR, usual response is "negative, remain outside controlled airspace, basic service only". If the radio traffic levels are very quiet (usually) and you ask for a delay time or a reason, a typical response is "inbound Easyjet 50 miles to run 3000 feet above you, you wouldn't be separated if I let you through the zone!"

Simple solution, turn transponder off and fly right round the line on the map.
panpanpanpan is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2016, 21:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This problem at EGAA has been discussed here before. Have a word with the SATCO panpan', or failing that GATCO or possibly GA Chirp. I don't know their current procedures, but if that is a genuine response to a CTR transit request, it sounds odd. I did 18 years on approach radar, in Rule 21, (Class A), and later Class D Airspace. Even if the radar at EGAA was u/s, there should be some way of accommodating VFR transits.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2016, 15:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At my unit I would prefer VFR but this would be at Not Above 2000'. If you wanted higher you could go IFR at above Min Stack then it's not my problem
Glamdring is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2016, 17:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I very very RARELY refused a transit at EGAA.

When this was brought up by Panpan before I told him the name of the boss and asked him to direct his complaints there, It appears he didn't.

Easier to come on here and whinge .

As to the crossing.

VFR,and if necessary,points to hold .
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2016, 20:20
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,169
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
At my unit I would prefer VFR but this would be at Not Above 2000'. If you wanted higher you could go IFR at above Min Stack then it's not my problem
Glamdring - as a matter of interest, why not above 2000 ft? Is that the limit of Class D airspace?


2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2016, 20:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe separating VFR from IFR...?
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2016, 21:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No real reason tbh, and I personally wouldn't stick to it rigidly. Just seems to be standard practice here. Not so much "separating" them from IFR but it does keep them out the way.
Glamdring is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2016, 11:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,169
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So really controlling as if it were Class C airspace when, in Class D, that is not what is mandated?

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2016, 11:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, I wonder where that is...
Talkdownman is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.