Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Privately funded ATC training...

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Privately funded ATC training...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jun 2013, 16:16
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: looking out of the window
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I was....
whitelighter is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 16:48
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hampshire UK
Age: 70
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry whitelighter, in this instance you are wrong. TC is very much part of NERL.
ATCO Two is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 17:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, what would happen if NATS lost one of the London airport contracts? Would there potentially be non-NATS staff at TC doing the approach function for the concerned airport? Or would the new ANSP be forced to relinquish the approach function to NATS?
Glamdring is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 17:50
  #24 (permalink)  
GR7
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I stand to be corrected, but I believe that the approach sectors in TC have all been absorbed into NERL. Luton was added during one of the recent 'CPs'. CP2 I think.
GR7 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 17:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home away from home
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the way I've understood it too, that for the London airports the bid is only for the aerodrome service and not approach.



To get back on the original topic, I can't help but think when I see this thread that if you can get something for free, why not take it? If you one day really want to move back then I'm sure you will be able too, but if ATC is what you want to do isn't it worth the sacrifice of moving? Especially when you not only get free training but also a salary during training (albeit a very modest one). That alone is more than 99% of people will ever get in their lifes, and even if you do self-fund your training you will have to move for the actual training (unless there's an ATC college where you live) and then still have no more gaurantee of being able to move back.

Last edited by Crazy Voyager; 12th Jun 2013 at 17:54.
Crazy Voyager is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 18:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: looking out of the window
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops - ok well you can't be right all the time.

I gracefully defer to my learned colleagues
whitelighter is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 19:08
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: solent-on-sea
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps someone should tell the TC staff that they are no longer NERL and needn't worry about VR then...? And maybe the GM too?
Not Long Now is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2013, 19:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glamdring,
We've sort of been there before. Many years ago, NATS lost the contract to to provide TWR/APC at EGGP.
The problem was, the EGGP DECCA 424 wasn't the best approach surveillance radar in the world, so much of the N0.1 Director function was still carried out by area and approach staff at EGCC, on an amicable and reciprocal basis.
I'll scratch your back, if you scratch mine. Worked splendidly for many years.
Then local management/politicians/accountants took hold.

You can guess the rest.
Many more track miles were flown, with all those naughty pollutants, decibels, and CO2 emissions that SESAR and FAS are trying to eliminate.
Hope it never happens.

Last edited by ZOOKER; 12th Jun 2013 at 19:54.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2013, 16:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 247
Received 23 Likes on 11 Posts
Crazy Voyager: That's the way I've understood it too, that for the London airports the bid is only for the aerodrome service and not approach.
Not strictly the case: any airport can contract its aerodrome & approach services from any ansp, it's just less likely that the London airports would take theirs out of TC - but they could, if they so wanted to.
Not Long Now: Perhaps someone should tell the TC staff that they are no longer NERL and needn't worry about VR then...?
Surely no-one needs to worry about VR? It's voluntary, if they don't want, surely don't volunteer. CR would be a different matter, but VR could well be an opportunity for some.
alfaman is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2013, 20:18
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Living In The Past
Age: 76
Posts: 299
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Surely no-one needs to worry about VR? It's voluntary, if they don't want, surely don't volunteer
Remember the old military aphorism - "a volunteer is someone who doesn't understand the question"
Eric T Cartman is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2013, 09:44
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the information. Currently thinking about moving back to UK to re-train in ATC. Found this thread very useful if not somewhat confusing with all the acronyms. A sign of things to come I guess
cjconnor24 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2013, 09:30
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a side-note (but still relevant for the original poster) remember that non-NATS units will consider any ATCO applicant when there is a vacancy, but NATS will not even consider qualified non-NATS ATCOs for their vacancies, unless you are personally known to the unit in question. Not an issue if you want to work at another ANSP, but a real problem with career progression generally, especially in the south of England.
slowclimber is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2013, 10:13
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<NATS will not even consider qualified non-NATS ATCOs for their vacancies,>>

Guess things have changed. They took me on in 1971 and I was non-NATS (or Min of Av in those days).
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2013, 10:22
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<NATS will not even consider qualified non-NATS ATCOs for their vacancies,>>

I think this was generally the case in the 80s and maybe even into the 90s but from what I understand, it's very definitely not the case any more.
LookingForAJob is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2013, 11:41
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: here
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so we've got the 70s, 80s and 90s covered. Any advances on the noughties?
sambatc is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2013, 12:58
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder how much of that is to do with the applicants? As soon as I joined I had to take an Approach Radar course which, by coincidence, was running at the same time as the Primary course which I would have been on had I not explained that I held a valid UK ATC Licence. Several people on that Primary course had licences but had simply done as they had been told and not questioned the decisions.

I left Heathrow Tower for TC in 2002 and there were certainly several non-NATS controllers who went straight to Heathrow from UK airfields, and they are still there.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.